1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-11-25 20:23:11 +01:00
llvm-mirror/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/SimpleSIVNoValidityCheckFixedSize.ll
Andy Kaylor cc0c445bfc [Dependence Analysis] Enable delinearization of fixed sized arrays
Patch by Artem Radzikhovskyy!

Allow delinearization of fixed sized arrays if we can prove that the GEP indices do not overflow the array dimensions. The checks applied are similar to the ones that are used for delinearization of parametric size arrays. Make sure that the GEP indices are non-negative and that they are smaller than the range of that dimension.

Changes Summary:

- Updated the LIT tests with more exact values, as we are able to delinearize and apply more exact tests
- profitability.ll - now able to delinearize in all cases, no need to use -da-disable-delinearization-checks flag and run the test twice
- loop-interchange-optimization-remarks.ll - in one of the cases we are able to delinearize without using -da-disable-delinearization-checks
- SimpleSIVNoValidityCheckFixedSize.ll - removed unnecessary "-da-disable-delinearization-checks" flag. Now can get the exact answer without it.
- SimpleSIVNoValidityCheckFixedSize.ll and PreliminaryNoValidityCheckFixedSize.ll - made negative tests more explicit, in order to demonstrate the need for "-da-disable-delinearization-checks" flag

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101486
2021-05-10 10:30:15 -07:00

123 lines
4.9 KiB
LLVM

; RUN: opt < %s -disable-output -passes="print<da>" 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt < %s -da -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 | FileCheck %s
; Note: exact results can be achived even if
; "-da-disable-delinearization-checks" is not used
; CHECK-LABEL: t1
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
; CHECK: da analyze - consistent anti [1 -2]!
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
;; #define N 1024
;; #define M 2048
;; void t1(int a[N][M]) {
;; for (int i = 0; i < N-1; ++i)
;; for (int j = 2; j < M; ++j)
;; a[i][j] = a[i+1][j-2];
;; }
define void @t1([2048 x i32]* %a) {
entry:
br label %for.body
for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.inc11
%indvars.iv4 = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %indvars.iv.next5, %for.inc11 ]
br label %for.body4
for.body4: ; preds = %for.body, %for.body4
%indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 2, %for.body ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body4 ]
%0 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv4, 1
%1 = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv, -2
%arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds [2048 x i32], [2048 x i32]* %a, i64 %0, i64 %1
%2 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx6, align 4
%arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds [2048 x i32], [2048 x i32]* %a, i64 %indvars.iv4, i64 %indvars.iv
store i32 %2, i32* %arrayidx10, align 4
%indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
%exitcond = icmp ne i64 %indvars.iv.next, 2048
br i1 %exitcond, label %for.body4, label %for.inc11
for.inc11: ; preds = %for.body4
%indvars.iv.next5 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv4, 1
%exitcond7 = icmp ne i64 %indvars.iv.next5, 1023
br i1 %exitcond7, label %for.body, label %for.end13
for.end13: ; preds = %for.inc11
ret void
}
; CHECK-LABEL: t2
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
; CHECK: da analyze - consistent anti [1 -2 0 -3 2]!
; CHECK: da analyze - none!
;; #define N 1024
;; #define M 2048
;; void t2(int a[][N][N][N][M]) {
;; for (int i1 = 0; i1 < N-1; ++i1)
;; for (int i2 = 2; i2 < N; ++i2)
;; for (int i3 = 0; i3 < N; ++i3)
;; for (int i4 = 3; i4 < N; ++i4)
;; for (int i5 = 0; i5 < M-2; ++i5)
;; a[i1][i2][i3][i4][i5] = a[i1+1][i2-2][i3][i4-3][i5+2];
;; }
define void @t2([1024 x [1024 x [1024 x [2048 x i32]]]]* %a) {
entry:
br label %for.body
for.body: ; preds = %entry, %for.inc46
%indvars.iv18 = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %indvars.iv.next19, %for.inc46 ]
br label %for.body4
for.body4: ; preds = %for.body, %for.inc43
%indvars.iv14 = phi i64 [ 2, %for.body ], [ %indvars.iv.next15, %for.inc43 ]
br label %for.body8
for.body8: ; preds = %for.body4, %for.inc40
%indvars.iv11 = phi i64 [ 0, %for.body4 ], [ %indvars.iv.next12, %for.inc40 ]
br label %for.body12
for.body12: ; preds = %for.body8, %for.inc37
%indvars.iv7 = phi i64 [ 3, %for.body8 ], [ %indvars.iv.next8, %for.inc37 ]
br label %for.body16
for.body16: ; preds = %for.body12, %for.body16
%indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 0, %for.body12 ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body16 ]
%0 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv18, 1
%1 = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv14, -2
%2 = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv7, -3
%3 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 2
%arrayidx26 = getelementptr inbounds [1024 x [1024 x [1024 x [2048 x i32]]]], [1024 x [1024 x [1024 x [2048 x i32]]]]* %a, i64 %0, i64 %1, i64 %indvars.iv11, i64 %2, i64 %3
%4 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx26, align 4
%arrayidx36 = getelementptr inbounds [1024 x [1024 x [1024 x [2048 x i32]]]], [1024 x [1024 x [1024 x [2048 x i32]]]]* %a, i64 %indvars.iv18, i64 %indvars.iv14, i64 %indvars.iv11, i64 %indvars.iv7, i64 %indvars.iv
store i32 %4, i32* %arrayidx36, align 4
%indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
%exitcond = icmp ne i64 %indvars.iv.next, 2046
br i1 %exitcond, label %for.body16, label %for.inc37
for.inc37: ; preds = %for.body16
%indvars.iv.next8 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv7, 1
%exitcond10 = icmp ne i64 %indvars.iv.next8, 1024
br i1 %exitcond10, label %for.body12, label %for.inc40
for.inc40: ; preds = %for.inc37
%indvars.iv.next12 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv11, 1
%exitcond13 = icmp ne i64 %indvars.iv.next12, 1024
br i1 %exitcond13, label %for.body8, label %for.inc43
for.inc43: ; preds = %for.inc40
%indvars.iv.next15 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv14, 1
%exitcond17 = icmp ne i64 %indvars.iv.next15, 1024
br i1 %exitcond17, label %for.body4, label %for.inc46
for.inc46: ; preds = %for.inc43
%indvars.iv.next19 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv18, 1
%exitcond21 = icmp ne i64 %indvars.iv.next19, 1023
br i1 %exitcond21, label %for.body, label %for.end48
for.end48: ; preds = %for.inc46
ret void
}