mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2025-01-31 20:51:52 +01:00
f4f5b32f44
Summary: In the context of http://wg21.link/lwg2445 C++ uses the concept of 'stronger' ordering but doesn't define it properly. This should be fixed in C++17 barring a small question that's still open. The code currently plays fast and loose with the AtomicOrdering enum. Using an enum class is one step towards tightening things. I later also want to tighten related enums, such as clang's AtomicOrderingKind (which should be shared with LLVM as a 'C++ ABI' enum). This change touches a few lines of code which can be improved later, I'd like to keep it as NFC for now as it's already quite complex. I have related changes for clang. As a follow-up I'll add: bool operator<(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete; bool operator>(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete; bool operator<=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete; bool operator>=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete; This is separate so that clang and LLVM changes don't need to be in sync. Reviewers: jyknight, reames Subscribers: jyknight, llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18775 llvm-svn: 265602
Analysis Opportunities:
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the
ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this:
{1,+,3,+,2}<loop>
Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however
ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as
(-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n))
In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic,
which is very inefficient when expanded into code.
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
In formatValue in test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-delayed-fold.ll,
ScalarEvolution is forming this expression:
((trunc i64 (-1 * %arg5) to i32) + (trunc i64 %arg5 to i32) + (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32)))
This could be folded to
(-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32))
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//