1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2025-01-31 20:51:52 +01:00
Arthur Eubanks 09cfe7939a [SCEV] Fix ScalarEvolution tests under NPM
Many tests use opt's -analyze feature, which does not translate well to
NPM and has better alternatives. The alternative here is to explicitly
add a pass that calls ScalarEvolution::print().

The legacy pass manager RUNs aren't changing, but they are now pinned to
the legacy pass manager.  For each legacy pass manager RUN, I added a
corresponding NPM RUN using the 'print<scalar-evolution>' pass. For
compatibility with update_analyze_test_checks.py and existing test
CHECKs, 'print<scalar-evolution>' now prints what -analyze prints per
function.

This was generated by the following Python script and failures were
manually fixed up:

import sys
for i in sys.argv:
    with open(i, 'r') as f:
        s = f.read()
    with open(i, 'w') as f:
        for l in s.splitlines():
            if "RUN:" in l and ' -analyze ' in l and '\\' not in l:
                f.write(l.replace(' -analyze ', ' -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 '))
                f.write('\n')
                f.write(l.replace(' -analyze ', ' -disable-output ').replace(' -scalar-evolution ', ' "-passes=print<scalar-evolution>" ').replace(" | ", " 2>&1 | "))
                f.write('\n')
            else:
                f.write(l)

There are a couple failures still in ScalarEvolution under NPM, but
those are due to other unrelated naming conflicts.

Reviewed By: asbirlea

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83798
2020-07-16 11:24:07 -07:00

56 lines
1.7 KiB
LLVM

; RUN: opt < %s -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 -scalar-evolution | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt < %s -disable-output "-passes=print<scalar-evolution>" 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
define void @merge_values_with_ranges(i32 *%a_len_ptr, i32 *%b_len_ptr, i1 %unknown_cond) {
; CHECK-LABEL: Classifying expressions for: @merge_values_with_ranges
; CHECK: %len = phi i32 [ %len_a, %if.true ], [ %len_b, %if.false ]
; CHECK-NEXT: --> %len U: [0,2147483647) S: [0,2147483647)
entry:
br i1 %unknown_cond, label %if.true, label %if.false
if.true:
%len_a = load i32, i32* %a_len_ptr, !range !0
br label %merge
if.false:
%len_b = load i32, i32* %b_len_ptr, !range !0
br label %merge
merge:
%len = phi i32 [ %len_a, %if.true ], [ %len_b, %if.false ]
ret void
}
define void @merge_values_with_ranges_looped(i32 *%a_len_ptr, i32 *%b_len_ptr) {
; TODO: We could be much smarter here. So far we just make sure that we do not
; go into infinite loop analyzing these Phis.
; CHECK-LABEL: Classifying expressions for: @merge_values_with_ranges_looped
; CHECK: %p1 = phi i32 [ %len_a, %entry ], [ %p2, %loop ]
; CHECK-NEXT: --> %p1 U: full-set S: full-set
; CHECK: %p2 = phi i32 [ %len_b, %entry ], [ %p1, %loop ]
; CHECK-NEXT: --> %p2 U: full-set S: full-set
entry:
%len_a = load i32, i32* %a_len_ptr, !range !0
%len_b = load i32, i32* %b_len_ptr, !range !0
br label %loop
loop:
%p1 = phi i32 [ %len_a, %entry ], [ %p2, %loop ]
%p2 = phi i32 [ %len_b, %entry ], [ %p1, %loop ]
%iv = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %iv.next, %loop ]
%iv.next = add i32 %iv, 1
%loop.cond = icmp slt i32 %iv.next, 100
br i1 %loop.cond, label %loop, label %exit
exit:
ret void
}
!0 = !{i32 0, i32 2147483647}