1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-11-24 03:33:20 +01:00
llvm-mirror/test/CodeGen/Thumb/bic_imm.ll
James Molloy ea23b745af [Thumb] Reapply r272251 with a fix for PR28348 (mk 2)
The important thing I was missing was ensuring newly added constants were kept in topological order. Repositioning the node is correct if the constant is newly added (so it has no topological ordering) but wrong if it already existed - positioning it next in the worklist would break the topological ordering.

Original commit message:
  [Thumb] Select a BIC instead of AND if the immediate can be encoded more optimally negated

  If an immediate is only used in an AND node, it is possible that the immediate can be more optimally materialized when negated. If this is the case, we can negate the immediate and use a BIC instead;

    int i(int a) {
      return a & 0xfffffeec;
    }

  Used to produce:
      ldr r1, [CONSTPOOL]
      ands r0, r1
    CONSTPOOL: 0xfffffeec

  And now produces:
      movs    r1, #255
      adds    r1, #20  ; Less costly immediate generation
      bics    r0, r1

llvm-svn: 274543
2016-07-05 12:37:13 +00:00

27 lines
686 B
LLVM

; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m0 -verify-machineinstrs | FileCheck --check-prefix CHECK-T1 %s
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv7-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-m3 -verify-machineinstrs | FileCheck --check-prefix CHECK-T2 %s
; CHECK-T1-LABEL: @i
; CHECK-T2-LABEL: @i
; CHECK-T1: movs r1, #255
; CHECK-T1: adds r1, #20
; CHECK-T1: bics r0, r1
; CHECK-T2: movw r1, #275
; CHECK-T2: bics r0, r1
define i32 @i(i32 %a) {
entry:
%and = and i32 %a, -276
ret i32 %and
}
; CHECK-T1-LABEL: @j
; CHECK-T2-LABEL: @j
; CHECK-T1: movs r1, #128
; CHECK-T1: bics r0, r1
; CHECK-T2: bic r0, r0, #128
define i32 @j(i32 %a) {
entry:
%and = and i32 %a, -129
ret i32 %and
}