1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-10-18 18:42:46 +02:00
llvm-mirror/unittests/ADT/PostOrderIteratorTest.cpp
Florian Hahn bd2bad88ac [ADT] Update RPOT to work with specializations of different types.
At the moment, ReversePostOrderTraversal performs a post-order walk on
the entry node of the passed in graph, rather than the graph type
itself.

If GT::NodeRef is the same as GraphT, everything works as expected and
this is the case for the current uses in-tree. But it does not work as
expected if GraphT != GT::NodeRef. In that case, we either fail to build
(if there is no GraphTrait specialization for GT:NodeRef) or we pick the
GraphTrait specialization for GT::NodeRef, instead of the specialization
of GraphT.

Both the depth-first and post-order iterators pick the expected
specalization and this patch updates ReversePostOrderTraversal to
delegate to po_begin & po_end to pick the right specialization, rather
than forcing using GraphTraits<GT::NodeRef>, by first getting the entry
node.

This makes `ReversePostOrderTraversal<Graph<6>> RPOT(G);` build and
work as expected in the test.

Reviewed By: dexonsmith

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100169
2021-04-17 20:45:04 +01:00

75 lines
2.2 KiB
C++

//===- PostOrderIteratorTest.cpp - PostOrderIterator unit tests -----------===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "llvm/ADT/PostOrderIterator.h"
#include "llvm/IR/BasicBlock.h"
#include "llvm/IR/CFG.h"
#include "gtest/gtest.h"
#include "TestGraph.h"
using namespace llvm;
namespace {
// Whether we're able to compile
TEST(PostOrderIteratorTest, Compiles) {
typedef SmallPtrSet<void *, 4> ExtSetTy;
// Tests that template specializations are kept up to date
void *Null = nullptr;
po_iterator_storage<std::set<void *>, false> PIS;
PIS.insertEdge(Optional<void *>(), Null);
ExtSetTy Ext;
po_iterator_storage<ExtSetTy, true> PISExt(Ext);
PIS.insertEdge(Optional<void *>(), Null);
// Test above, but going through po_iterator (which inherits from template
// base)
BasicBlock *NullBB = nullptr;
auto PI = po_end(NullBB);
PI.insertEdge(Optional<BasicBlock *>(), NullBB);
auto PIExt = po_ext_end(NullBB, Ext);
PIExt.insertEdge(Optional<BasicBlock *>(), NullBB);
}
// Test post-order and reverse post-order traversals for simple graph type.
TEST(PostOrderIteratorTest, PostOrderAndReversePostOrderTraverrsal) {
Graph<6> G;
G.AddEdge(0, 1);
G.AddEdge(0, 2);
G.AddEdge(0, 3);
G.AddEdge(1, 4);
G.AddEdge(2, 5);
G.AddEdge(5, 2);
G.AddEdge(2, 4);
G.AddEdge(1, 4);
SmallVector<int> FromIterator;
for (auto N : post_order(G))
FromIterator.push_back(N->first);
EXPECT_EQ(6u, FromIterator.size());
EXPECT_EQ(4, FromIterator[0]);
EXPECT_EQ(1, FromIterator[1]);
EXPECT_EQ(5, FromIterator[2]);
EXPECT_EQ(2, FromIterator[3]);
EXPECT_EQ(3, FromIterator[4]);
EXPECT_EQ(0, FromIterator[5]);
FromIterator.clear();
ReversePostOrderTraversal<Graph<6>> RPOT(G);
for (auto N : RPOT)
FromIterator.push_back(N->first);
EXPECT_EQ(6u, FromIterator.size());
EXPECT_EQ(0, FromIterator[0]);
EXPECT_EQ(3, FromIterator[1]);
EXPECT_EQ(2, FromIterator[2]);
EXPECT_EQ(5, FromIterator[3]);
EXPECT_EQ(1, FromIterator[4]);
EXPECT_EQ(4, FromIterator[5]);
}
}