mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2024-11-24 11:42:57 +01:00
e43ddd00f6
In GlobalISel, if you have a load into a small type with a range, you'll hit an assert if you try to compute known bits on it starting at a larger type. e.g. ``` %x:_(s8) = G_LOAD %whatever(p0) :: (load 1 ... !range !n) ... %y:_(s32) = G_SOMETHING %x ``` When we walk through G_SOMETHING and hit the load, the width of our known bits is 32. However, the width of the range is going to be 8. This will cause us to hit an assert. To fix this, make computeKnownBitsFromRangeMetadata zero extend or truncate the range type to match the bitwidth of the known bits we're calculating. Add a testcase in CodeGen/GlobalISel/KnownBitsTest.cpp to reflect that this works now. https://reviews.llvm.org/D85375 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
models/inliner | ||
AliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
AliasAnalysisEvaluator.cpp | ||
AliasAnalysisSummary.cpp | ||
AliasAnalysisSummary.h | ||
AliasSetTracker.cpp | ||
Analysis.cpp | ||
AssumeBundleQueries.cpp | ||
AssumptionCache.cpp | ||
BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
BlockFrequencyInfo.cpp | ||
BlockFrequencyInfoImpl.cpp | ||
BranchProbabilityInfo.cpp | ||
CallGraph.cpp | ||
CallGraphSCCPass.cpp | ||
CallPrinter.cpp | ||
CaptureTracking.cpp | ||
CFG.cpp | ||
CFGPrinter.cpp | ||
CFLAndersAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
CFLGraph.h | ||
CFLSteensAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
CGSCCPassManager.cpp | ||
CMakeLists.txt | ||
CmpInstAnalysis.cpp | ||
CodeMetrics.cpp | ||
ConstantFolding.cpp | ||
CostModel.cpp | ||
DDG.cpp | ||
Delinearization.cpp | ||
DemandedBits.cpp | ||
DependenceAnalysis.cpp | ||
DependenceGraphBuilder.cpp | ||
DevelopmentModeInlineAdvisor.cpp | ||
DivergenceAnalysis.cpp | ||
DominanceFrontier.cpp | ||
DomPrinter.cpp | ||
DomTreeUpdater.cpp | ||
EHPersonalities.cpp | ||
FunctionPropertiesAnalysis.cpp | ||
GlobalsModRef.cpp | ||
GuardUtils.cpp | ||
HeatUtils.cpp | ||
IndirectCallPromotionAnalysis.cpp | ||
InlineAdvisor.cpp | ||
InlineCost.cpp | ||
InlineSizeEstimatorAnalysis.cpp | ||
InstCount.cpp | ||
InstructionPrecedenceTracking.cpp | ||
InstructionSimplify.cpp | ||
Interval.cpp | ||
IntervalPartition.cpp | ||
IVDescriptors.cpp | ||
IVUsers.cpp | ||
LazyBlockFrequencyInfo.cpp | ||
LazyBranchProbabilityInfo.cpp | ||
LazyCallGraph.cpp | ||
LazyValueInfo.cpp | ||
LegacyDivergenceAnalysis.cpp | ||
Lint.cpp | ||
LLVMBuild.txt | ||
Loads.cpp | ||
LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp | ||
LoopAnalysisManager.cpp | ||
LoopCacheAnalysis.cpp | ||
LoopInfo.cpp | ||
LoopNestAnalysis.cpp | ||
LoopPass.cpp | ||
LoopUnrollAnalyzer.cpp | ||
MemDepPrinter.cpp | ||
MemDerefPrinter.cpp | ||
MemoryBuiltins.cpp | ||
MemoryDependenceAnalysis.cpp | ||
MemoryLocation.cpp | ||
MemorySSA.cpp | ||
MemorySSAUpdater.cpp | ||
MLInlineAdvisor.cpp | ||
ModuleDebugInfoPrinter.cpp | ||
ModuleSummaryAnalysis.cpp | ||
MustExecute.cpp | ||
ObjCARCAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
ObjCARCAnalysisUtils.cpp | ||
ObjCARCInstKind.cpp | ||
OptimizationRemarkEmitter.cpp | ||
PHITransAddr.cpp | ||
PhiValues.cpp | ||
PostDominators.cpp | ||
ProfileSummaryInfo.cpp | ||
PtrUseVisitor.cpp | ||
README.txt | ||
RegionInfo.cpp | ||
RegionPass.cpp | ||
RegionPrinter.cpp | ||
ReleaseModeModelRunner.cpp | ||
ScalarEvolution.cpp | ||
ScalarEvolutionAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
ScalarEvolutionDivision.cpp | ||
ScalarEvolutionNormalization.cpp | ||
ScopedNoAliasAA.cpp | ||
StackLifetime.cpp | ||
StackSafetyAnalysis.cpp | ||
StratifiedSets.h | ||
SyncDependenceAnalysis.cpp | ||
SyntheticCountsUtils.cpp | ||
TargetLibraryInfo.cpp | ||
TargetTransformInfo.cpp | ||
TFUtils.cpp | ||
Trace.cpp | ||
TypeBasedAliasAnalysis.cpp | ||
TypeMetadataUtils.cpp | ||
ValueLattice.cpp | ||
ValueLatticeUtils.cpp | ||
ValueTracking.cpp | ||
VectorUtils.cpp | ||
VFABIDemangling.cpp |
Analysis Opportunities: //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this: {1,+,3,+,2}<loop> Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as (-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n)) In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic, which is very inefficient when expanded into code. //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// In formatValue in test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-delayed-fold.ll, ScalarEvolution is forming this expression: ((trunc i64 (-1 * %arg5) to i32) + (trunc i64 %arg5 to i32) + (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32))) This could be folded to (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32)) //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//