mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2024-11-25 20:23:11 +01:00
aa78fc4f6e
Summary: DominatorTreeBase used to have IsPostDominators (bool) member to indicate if the tree is a dominator or a postdominator tree. This made it possible to switch between the two 'modes' at runtime, but it isn't used in practice anywhere. This patch makes IsPostDominator a template argument. This way, it is easier to switch between different algorithms at compile-time based on this argument and design external utilities around it. It also makes it impossible to incidentally assign a postdominator tree to a dominator tree (and vice versa), and to further simplify template code in GenericDominatorTreeConstruction. Reviewers: dberlin, sanjoy, davide, grosser Reviewed By: dberlin Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35315 llvm-svn: 308040
158 lines
5.0 KiB
C++
158 lines
5.0 KiB
C++
//===- MachineDominators.cpp - Machine Dominator Calculation --------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
|
|
//
|
|
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
|
|
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// This file implements simple dominator construction algorithms for finding
|
|
// forward dominators on machine functions.
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineDominators.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallBitVector.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/CodeGen/Passes.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h"
|
|
|
|
using namespace llvm;
|
|
|
|
// Always verify dominfo if expensive checking is enabled.
|
|
#ifdef EXPENSIVE_CHECKS
|
|
static bool VerifyMachineDomInfo = true;
|
|
#else
|
|
static bool VerifyMachineDomInfo = false;
|
|
#endif
|
|
static cl::opt<bool, true> VerifyMachineDomInfoX(
|
|
"verify-machine-dom-info", cl::location(VerifyMachineDomInfo),
|
|
cl::desc("Verify machine dominator info (time consuming)"));
|
|
|
|
namespace llvm {
|
|
template class DomTreeNodeBase<MachineBasicBlock>;
|
|
template class DominatorTreeBase<MachineBasicBlock, false>; // DomTreeBase
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
char MachineDominatorTree::ID = 0;
|
|
|
|
INITIALIZE_PASS(MachineDominatorTree, "machinedomtree",
|
|
"MachineDominator Tree Construction", true, true)
|
|
|
|
char &llvm::MachineDominatorsID = MachineDominatorTree::ID;
|
|
|
|
void MachineDominatorTree::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
|
|
AU.setPreservesAll();
|
|
MachineFunctionPass::getAnalysisUsage(AU);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool MachineDominatorTree::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &F) {
|
|
CriticalEdgesToSplit.clear();
|
|
NewBBs.clear();
|
|
DT.reset(new DomTreeBase<MachineBasicBlock>());
|
|
DT->recalculate(F);
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
MachineDominatorTree::MachineDominatorTree()
|
|
: MachineFunctionPass(ID) {
|
|
initializeMachineDominatorTreePass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void MachineDominatorTree::releaseMemory() {
|
|
CriticalEdgesToSplit.clear();
|
|
DT.reset(nullptr);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void MachineDominatorTree::verifyAnalysis() const {
|
|
if (DT && VerifyMachineDomInfo)
|
|
verifyDomTree();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void MachineDominatorTree::print(raw_ostream &OS, const Module*) const {
|
|
if (DT)
|
|
DT->print(OS);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void MachineDominatorTree::applySplitCriticalEdges() const {
|
|
// Bail out early if there is nothing to do.
|
|
if (CriticalEdgesToSplit.empty())
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
// For each element in CriticalEdgesToSplit, remember whether or not element
|
|
// is the new immediate domminator of its successor. The mapping is done by
|
|
// index, i.e., the information for the ith element of CriticalEdgesToSplit is
|
|
// the ith element of IsNewIDom.
|
|
SmallBitVector IsNewIDom(CriticalEdgesToSplit.size(), true);
|
|
size_t Idx = 0;
|
|
|
|
// Collect all the dominance properties info, before invalidating
|
|
// the underlying DT.
|
|
for (CriticalEdge &Edge : CriticalEdgesToSplit) {
|
|
// Update dominator information.
|
|
MachineBasicBlock *Succ = Edge.ToBB;
|
|
MachineDomTreeNode *SuccDTNode = DT->getNode(Succ);
|
|
|
|
for (MachineBasicBlock *PredBB : Succ->predecessors()) {
|
|
if (PredBB == Edge.NewBB)
|
|
continue;
|
|
// If we are in this situation:
|
|
// FromBB1 FromBB2
|
|
// + +
|
|
// + + + +
|
|
// + + + +
|
|
// ... Split1 Split2 ...
|
|
// + +
|
|
// + +
|
|
// +
|
|
// Succ
|
|
// Instead of checking the domiance property with Split2, we check it with
|
|
// FromBB2 since Split2 is still unknown of the underlying DT structure.
|
|
if (NewBBs.count(PredBB)) {
|
|
assert(PredBB->pred_size() == 1 && "A basic block resulting from a "
|
|
"critical edge split has more "
|
|
"than one predecessor!");
|
|
PredBB = *PredBB->pred_begin();
|
|
}
|
|
if (!DT->dominates(SuccDTNode, DT->getNode(PredBB))) {
|
|
IsNewIDom[Idx] = false;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
++Idx;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Now, update DT with the collected dominance properties info.
|
|
Idx = 0;
|
|
for (CriticalEdge &Edge : CriticalEdgesToSplit) {
|
|
// We know FromBB dominates NewBB.
|
|
MachineDomTreeNode *NewDTNode = DT->addNewBlock(Edge.NewBB, Edge.FromBB);
|
|
|
|
// If all the other predecessors of "Succ" are dominated by "Succ" itself
|
|
// then the new block is the new immediate dominator of "Succ". Otherwise,
|
|
// the new block doesn't dominate anything.
|
|
if (IsNewIDom[Idx])
|
|
DT->changeImmediateDominator(DT->getNode(Edge.ToBB), NewDTNode);
|
|
++Idx;
|
|
}
|
|
NewBBs.clear();
|
|
CriticalEdgesToSplit.clear();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void MachineDominatorTree::verifyDomTree() const {
|
|
if (!DT)
|
|
return;
|
|
MachineFunction &F = *getRoot()->getParent();
|
|
|
|
DomTreeBase<MachineBasicBlock> OtherDT;
|
|
OtherDT.recalculate(F);
|
|
if (getRootNode()->getBlock() != OtherDT.getRootNode()->getBlock() ||
|
|
DT->compare(OtherDT)) {
|
|
errs() << "MachineDominatorTree is not up to date!\nComputed:\n";
|
|
DT->print(errs());
|
|
errs() << "\nActual:\n";
|
|
OtherDT.print(errs());
|
|
abort();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|