mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2024-10-21 12:02:58 +02:00
ee051af6e2
directory. These passes are already defined in the IR library, and it doesn't make any sense to have the headers in Analysis. Long term, I think there is going to be a much better way to divide these matters. The dominators code should be fully separated into the abstract graph algorithm and have that put in Support where it becomes obvious that evn Clang's CFGBlock's can use it. Then the verifier can manually construct dominance information from the Support-driven interface while the Analysis library can provide a pass which both caches, reconstructs, and supports a nice update API. But those are very long term, and so I don't want to leave the really confusing structure until that day arrives. llvm-svn: 199082
232 lines
7.7 KiB
C++
232 lines
7.7 KiB
C++
//===- llvm/unittests/IR/DominatorTreeTest.cpp - Constants unit tests -----===//
|
|
//
|
|
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
|
|
//
|
|
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
|
|
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/PostDominators.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/AsmParser/Parser.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Instructions.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/LLVMContext.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Module.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/PassManager.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/SourceMgr.h"
|
|
#include "gtest/gtest.h"
|
|
|
|
using namespace llvm;
|
|
|
|
namespace llvm {
|
|
void initializeDPassPass(PassRegistry&);
|
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
struct DPass : public FunctionPass {
|
|
static char ID;
|
|
virtual bool runOnFunction(Function &F) {
|
|
DominatorTree *DT = &getAnalysis<DominatorTree>();
|
|
PostDominatorTree *PDT = &getAnalysis<PostDominatorTree>();
|
|
Function::iterator FI = F.begin();
|
|
|
|
BasicBlock *BB0 = FI++;
|
|
BasicBlock::iterator BBI = BB0->begin();
|
|
Instruction *Y1 = BBI++;
|
|
Instruction *Y2 = BBI++;
|
|
Instruction *Y3 = BBI++;
|
|
|
|
BasicBlock *BB1 = FI++;
|
|
BBI = BB1->begin();
|
|
Instruction *Y4 = BBI++;
|
|
|
|
BasicBlock *BB2 = FI++;
|
|
BBI = BB2->begin();
|
|
Instruction *Y5 = BBI++;
|
|
|
|
BasicBlock *BB3 = FI++;
|
|
BBI = BB3->begin();
|
|
Instruction *Y6 = BBI++;
|
|
Instruction *Y7 = BBI++;
|
|
|
|
BasicBlock *BB4 = FI++;
|
|
BBI = BB4->begin();
|
|
Instruction *Y8 = BBI++;
|
|
Instruction *Y9 = BBI++;
|
|
|
|
// Reachability
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->isReachableFromEntry(BB0));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->isReachableFromEntry(BB1));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->isReachableFromEntry(BB2));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->isReachableFromEntry(BB3));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->isReachableFromEntry(BB4));
|
|
|
|
// BB dominance
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB0, BB0));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB0, BB1));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB0, BB2));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB0, BB3));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB0, BB4));
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB1, BB0));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB1, BB1));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB1, BB2));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB1, BB3));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB1, BB4));
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB2, BB0));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB2, BB1));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB2, BB2));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB2, BB3));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB2, BB4));
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB3, BB0));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB3, BB1));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB3, BB2));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(BB3, BB3));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(BB3, BB4));
|
|
|
|
// BB proper dominance
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB0, BB0));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->properlyDominates(BB0, BB1));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->properlyDominates(BB0, BB2));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->properlyDominates(BB0, BB3));
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB1, BB0));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB1, BB1));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB1, BB2));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->properlyDominates(BB1, BB3));
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB2, BB0));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB2, BB1));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB2, BB2));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->properlyDominates(BB2, BB3));
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB3, BB0));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB3, BB1));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB3, BB2));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->properlyDominates(BB3, BB3));
|
|
|
|
// Instruction dominance in the same reachable BB
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y1, Y1));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y1, Y2));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y2, Y1));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y2, Y2));
|
|
|
|
// Instruction dominance in the same unreachable BB
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y6, Y6));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y6, Y7));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y7, Y6));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y7, Y7));
|
|
|
|
// Invoke
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y3, Y4));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y3, Y5));
|
|
|
|
// Phi
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y2, Y9));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y3, Y9));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y8, Y9));
|
|
|
|
// Anything dominates unreachable
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y1, Y6));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y3, Y6));
|
|
|
|
// Unreachable doesn't dominate reachable
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y6, Y1));
|
|
|
|
// Instruction, BB dominance
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y1, BB0));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y1, BB1));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y1, BB2));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y1, BB3));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y1, BB4));
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y3, BB0));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y3, BB1));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y3, BB2));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y3, BB3));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(DT->dominates(Y3, BB4));
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(DT->dominates(Y6, BB3));
|
|
|
|
// Post dominance.
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(PDT->dominates(BB0, BB0));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(PDT->dominates(BB1, BB0));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(PDT->dominates(BB2, BB0));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(PDT->dominates(BB3, BB0));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(PDT->dominates(BB4, BB1));
|
|
|
|
// Dominance descendants.
|
|
SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 8> DominatedBBs, PostDominatedBBs;
|
|
|
|
DT->getDescendants(BB0, DominatedBBs);
|
|
PDT->getDescendants(BB0, PostDominatedBBs);
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(DominatedBBs.size(), 4UL);
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(PostDominatedBBs.size(), 1UL);
|
|
|
|
// BB3 is unreachable. It should have no dominators nor postdominators.
|
|
DominatedBBs.clear();
|
|
PostDominatedBBs.clear();
|
|
DT->getDescendants(BB3, DominatedBBs);
|
|
DT->getDescendants(BB3, PostDominatedBBs);
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(DominatedBBs.size(), 0UL);
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(PostDominatedBBs.size(), 0UL);
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
|
|
AU.addRequired<DominatorTree>();
|
|
AU.addRequired<PostDominatorTree>();
|
|
}
|
|
DPass() : FunctionPass(ID) {
|
|
initializeDPassPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
char DPass::ID = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Module* makeLLVMModule(DPass *P) {
|
|
const char *ModuleStrig =
|
|
"declare i32 @g()\n" \
|
|
"define void @f(i32 %x) {\n" \
|
|
"bb0:\n" \
|
|
" %y1 = add i32 %x, 1\n" \
|
|
" %y2 = add i32 %x, 1\n" \
|
|
" %y3 = invoke i32 @g() to label %bb1 unwind label %bb2\n" \
|
|
"bb1:\n" \
|
|
" %y4 = add i32 %x, 1\n" \
|
|
" br label %bb4\n" \
|
|
"bb2:\n" \
|
|
" %y5 = landingpad i32 personality i32 ()* @g\n" \
|
|
" cleanup\n" \
|
|
" br label %bb4\n" \
|
|
"bb3:\n" \
|
|
" %y6 = add i32 %x, 1\n" \
|
|
" %y7 = add i32 %x, 1\n" \
|
|
" ret void\n" \
|
|
"bb4:\n" \
|
|
" %y8 = phi i32 [0, %bb2], [%y4, %bb1]\n"
|
|
" %y9 = phi i32 [0, %bb2], [%y4, %bb1]\n"
|
|
" ret void\n" \
|
|
"}\n";
|
|
LLVMContext &C = getGlobalContext();
|
|
SMDiagnostic Err;
|
|
return ParseAssemblyString(ModuleStrig, NULL, Err, C);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TEST(DominatorTree, Unreachable) {
|
|
DPass *P = new DPass();
|
|
OwningPtr<Module> M(makeLLVMModule(P));
|
|
PassManager Passes;
|
|
Passes.add(P);
|
|
Passes.run(*M);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(DPass, "dpass", "dpass", false, false)
|
|
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(DominatorTree)
|
|
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(PostDominatorTree)
|
|
INITIALIZE_PASS_END(DPass, "dpass", "dpass", false, false)
|