mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git
synced 2024-11-23 11:13:28 +01:00
2c151e517d
Move the assert that checks for the end iterator inside the loop which actually moves over the elements. This allows it to check that the iteration stays within the range.
381 lines
13 KiB
C++
381 lines
13 KiB
C++
//===- SyncDependenceAnalysis.cpp - Divergent Branch Dependence Calculation
|
|
//--===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// This file implements an algorithm that returns for a divergent branch
|
|
// the set of basic blocks whose phi nodes become divergent due to divergent
|
|
// control. These are the blocks that are reachable by two disjoint paths from
|
|
// the branch or loop exits that have a reaching path that is disjoint from a
|
|
// path to the loop latch.
|
|
//
|
|
// The SyncDependenceAnalysis is used in the DivergenceAnalysis to model
|
|
// control-induced divergence in phi nodes.
|
|
//
|
|
// -- Summary --
|
|
// The SyncDependenceAnalysis lazily computes sync dependences [3].
|
|
// The analysis evaluates the disjoint path criterion [2] by a reduction
|
|
// to SSA construction. The SSA construction algorithm is implemented as
|
|
// a simple data-flow analysis [1].
|
|
//
|
|
// [1] "A Simple, Fast Dominance Algorithm", SPI '01, Cooper, Harvey and Kennedy
|
|
// [2] "Efficiently Computing Static Single Assignment Form
|
|
// and the Control Dependence Graph", TOPLAS '91,
|
|
// Cytron, Ferrante, Rosen, Wegman and Zadeck
|
|
// [3] "Improving Performance of OpenCL on CPUs", CC '12, Karrenberg and Hack
|
|
// [4] "Divergence Analysis", TOPLAS '13, Sampaio, Souza, Collange and Pereira
|
|
//
|
|
// -- Sync dependence --
|
|
// Sync dependence [4] characterizes the control flow aspect of the
|
|
// propagation of branch divergence. For example,
|
|
//
|
|
// %cond = icmp slt i32 %tid, 10
|
|
// br i1 %cond, label %then, label %else
|
|
// then:
|
|
// br label %merge
|
|
// else:
|
|
// br label %merge
|
|
// merge:
|
|
// %a = phi i32 [ 0, %then ], [ 1, %else ]
|
|
//
|
|
// Suppose %tid holds the thread ID. Although %a is not data dependent on %tid
|
|
// because %tid is not on its use-def chains, %a is sync dependent on %tid
|
|
// because the branch "br i1 %cond" depends on %tid and affects which value %a
|
|
// is assigned to.
|
|
//
|
|
// -- Reduction to SSA construction --
|
|
// There are two disjoint paths from A to X, if a certain variant of SSA
|
|
// construction places a phi node in X under the following set-up scheme [2].
|
|
//
|
|
// This variant of SSA construction ignores incoming undef values.
|
|
// That is paths from the entry without a definition do not result in
|
|
// phi nodes.
|
|
//
|
|
// entry
|
|
// / \
|
|
// A \
|
|
// / \ Y
|
|
// B C /
|
|
// \ / \ /
|
|
// D E
|
|
// \ /
|
|
// F
|
|
// Assume that A contains a divergent branch. We are interested
|
|
// in the set of all blocks where each block is reachable from A
|
|
// via two disjoint paths. This would be the set {D, F} in this
|
|
// case.
|
|
// To generally reduce this query to SSA construction we introduce
|
|
// a virtual variable x and assign to x different values in each
|
|
// successor block of A.
|
|
// entry
|
|
// / \
|
|
// A \
|
|
// / \ Y
|
|
// x = 0 x = 1 /
|
|
// \ / \ /
|
|
// D E
|
|
// \ /
|
|
// F
|
|
// Our flavor of SSA construction for x will construct the following
|
|
// entry
|
|
// / \
|
|
// A \
|
|
// / \ Y
|
|
// x0 = 0 x1 = 1 /
|
|
// \ / \ /
|
|
// x2=phi E
|
|
// \ /
|
|
// x3=phi
|
|
// The blocks D and F contain phi nodes and are thus each reachable
|
|
// by two disjoins paths from A.
|
|
//
|
|
// -- Remarks --
|
|
// In case of loop exits we need to check the disjoint path criterion for loops
|
|
// [2]. To this end, we check whether the definition of x differs between the
|
|
// loop exit and the loop header (_after_ SSA construction).
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/PostOrderIterator.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/PostDominators.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/SyncDependenceAnalysis.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/BasicBlock.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/CFG.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/Function.h"
|
|
|
|
#include <stack>
|
|
#include <unordered_set>
|
|
|
|
#define DEBUG_TYPE "sync-dependence"
|
|
|
|
namespace llvm {
|
|
|
|
ConstBlockSet SyncDependenceAnalysis::EmptyBlockSet;
|
|
|
|
SyncDependenceAnalysis::SyncDependenceAnalysis(const DominatorTree &DT,
|
|
const PostDominatorTree &PDT,
|
|
const LoopInfo &LI)
|
|
: FuncRPOT(DT.getRoot()->getParent()), DT(DT), PDT(PDT), LI(LI) {}
|
|
|
|
SyncDependenceAnalysis::~SyncDependenceAnalysis() {}
|
|
|
|
using FunctionRPOT = ReversePostOrderTraversal<const Function *>;
|
|
|
|
// divergence propagator for reducible CFGs
|
|
struct DivergencePropagator {
|
|
const FunctionRPOT &FuncRPOT;
|
|
const DominatorTree &DT;
|
|
const PostDominatorTree &PDT;
|
|
const LoopInfo &LI;
|
|
|
|
// identified join points
|
|
std::unique_ptr<ConstBlockSet> JoinBlocks;
|
|
|
|
// reached loop exits (by a path disjoint to a path to the loop header)
|
|
SmallPtrSet<const BasicBlock *, 4> ReachedLoopExits;
|
|
|
|
// if DefMap[B] == C then C is the dominating definition at block B
|
|
// if DefMap[B] ~ undef then we haven't seen B yet
|
|
// if DefMap[B] == B then B is a join point of disjoint paths from X or B is
|
|
// an immediate successor of X (initial value).
|
|
using DefiningBlockMap = std::map<const BasicBlock *, const BasicBlock *>;
|
|
DefiningBlockMap DefMap;
|
|
|
|
// all blocks with pending visits
|
|
std::unordered_set<const BasicBlock *> PendingUpdates;
|
|
|
|
DivergencePropagator(const FunctionRPOT &FuncRPOT, const DominatorTree &DT,
|
|
const PostDominatorTree &PDT, const LoopInfo &LI)
|
|
: FuncRPOT(FuncRPOT), DT(DT), PDT(PDT), LI(LI),
|
|
JoinBlocks(new ConstBlockSet) {}
|
|
|
|
// set the definition at @block and mark @block as pending for a visit
|
|
void addPending(const BasicBlock &Block, const BasicBlock &DefBlock) {
|
|
bool WasAdded = DefMap.emplace(&Block, &DefBlock).second;
|
|
if (WasAdded)
|
|
PendingUpdates.insert(&Block);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void printDefs(raw_ostream &Out) {
|
|
Out << "Propagator::DefMap {\n";
|
|
for (const auto *Block : FuncRPOT) {
|
|
auto It = DefMap.find(Block);
|
|
Out << Block->getName() << " : ";
|
|
if (It == DefMap.end()) {
|
|
Out << "\n";
|
|
} else {
|
|
const auto *DefBlock = It->second;
|
|
Out << (DefBlock ? DefBlock->getName() : "<null>") << "\n";
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
Out << "}\n";
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// process @succBlock with reaching definition @defBlock
|
|
// the original divergent branch was in @parentLoop (if any)
|
|
void visitSuccessor(const BasicBlock &SuccBlock, const Loop *ParentLoop,
|
|
const BasicBlock &DefBlock) {
|
|
|
|
// @succBlock is a loop exit
|
|
if (ParentLoop && !ParentLoop->contains(&SuccBlock)) {
|
|
DefMap.emplace(&SuccBlock, &DefBlock);
|
|
ReachedLoopExits.insert(&SuccBlock);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// first reaching def?
|
|
auto ItLastDef = DefMap.find(&SuccBlock);
|
|
if (ItLastDef == DefMap.end()) {
|
|
addPending(SuccBlock, DefBlock);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// a join of at least two definitions
|
|
if (ItLastDef->second != &DefBlock) {
|
|
// do we know this join already?
|
|
if (!JoinBlocks->insert(&SuccBlock).second)
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
// update the definition
|
|
addPending(SuccBlock, SuccBlock);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// find all blocks reachable by two disjoint paths from @rootTerm.
|
|
// This method works for both divergent terminators and loops with
|
|
// divergent exits.
|
|
// @rootBlock is either the block containing the branch or the header of the
|
|
// divergent loop.
|
|
// @nodeSuccessors is the set of successors of the node (Loop or Terminator)
|
|
// headed by @rootBlock.
|
|
// @parentLoop is the parent loop of the Loop or the loop that contains the
|
|
// Terminator.
|
|
template <typename SuccessorIterable>
|
|
std::unique_ptr<ConstBlockSet>
|
|
computeJoinPoints(const BasicBlock &RootBlock,
|
|
SuccessorIterable NodeSuccessors, const Loop *ParentLoop) {
|
|
assert(JoinBlocks);
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "SDA:computeJoinPoints. Parent loop: " << (ParentLoop ? ParentLoop->getName() : "<null>") << "\n" );
|
|
|
|
// bootstrap with branch targets
|
|
for (const auto *SuccBlock : NodeSuccessors) {
|
|
DefMap.emplace(SuccBlock, SuccBlock);
|
|
|
|
if (ParentLoop && !ParentLoop->contains(SuccBlock)) {
|
|
// immediate loop exit from node.
|
|
ReachedLoopExits.insert(SuccBlock);
|
|
} else {
|
|
// regular successor
|
|
PendingUpdates.insert(SuccBlock);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(
|
|
dbgs() << "SDA: rpo order:\n";
|
|
for (const auto * RpoBlock : FuncRPOT) {
|
|
dbgs() << "- " << RpoBlock->getName() << "\n";
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
auto ItBeginRPO = FuncRPOT.begin();
|
|
auto ItEndRPO = FuncRPOT.end();
|
|
|
|
// skip until term (TODO RPOT won't let us start at @term directly)
|
|
for (; *ItBeginRPO != &RootBlock; ++ItBeginRPO) {
|
|
assert(ItBeginRPO != ItEndRPO && "Unable to find RootBlock");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// propagate definitions at the immediate successors of the node in RPO
|
|
auto ItBlockRPO = ItBeginRPO;
|
|
while ((++ItBlockRPO != ItEndRPO) &&
|
|
!PendingUpdates.empty()) {
|
|
const auto *Block = *ItBlockRPO;
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "SDA::joins. visiting " << Block->getName() << "\n");
|
|
|
|
// skip Block if not pending update
|
|
auto ItPending = PendingUpdates.find(Block);
|
|
if (ItPending == PendingUpdates.end())
|
|
continue;
|
|
PendingUpdates.erase(ItPending);
|
|
|
|
// propagate definition at Block to its successors
|
|
auto ItDef = DefMap.find(Block);
|
|
const auto *DefBlock = ItDef->second;
|
|
assert(DefBlock);
|
|
|
|
auto *BlockLoop = LI.getLoopFor(Block);
|
|
if (ParentLoop &&
|
|
(ParentLoop != BlockLoop && ParentLoop->contains(BlockLoop))) {
|
|
// if the successor is the header of a nested loop pretend its a
|
|
// single node with the loop's exits as successors
|
|
SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 4> BlockLoopExits;
|
|
BlockLoop->getExitBlocks(BlockLoopExits);
|
|
for (const auto *BlockLoopExit : BlockLoopExits) {
|
|
visitSuccessor(*BlockLoopExit, ParentLoop, *DefBlock);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
// the successors are either on the same loop level or loop exits
|
|
for (const auto *SuccBlock : successors(Block)) {
|
|
visitSuccessor(*SuccBlock, ParentLoop, *DefBlock);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "SDA::joins. After propagation:\n"; printDefs(dbgs()));
|
|
|
|
// We need to know the definition at the parent loop header to decide
|
|
// whether the definition at the header is different from the definition at
|
|
// the loop exits, which would indicate a divergent loop exits.
|
|
//
|
|
// A // loop header
|
|
// |
|
|
// B // nested loop header
|
|
// |
|
|
// C -> X (exit from B loop) -..-> (A latch)
|
|
// |
|
|
// D -> back to B (B latch)
|
|
// |
|
|
// proper exit from both loops
|
|
//
|
|
// analyze reached loop exits
|
|
if (!ReachedLoopExits.empty()) {
|
|
const BasicBlock *ParentLoopHeader =
|
|
ParentLoop ? ParentLoop->getHeader() : nullptr;
|
|
|
|
assert(ParentLoop);
|
|
auto ItHeaderDef = DefMap.find(ParentLoopHeader);
|
|
const auto *HeaderDefBlock = (ItHeaderDef == DefMap.end()) ? nullptr : ItHeaderDef->second;
|
|
|
|
LLVM_DEBUG(printDefs(dbgs()));
|
|
assert(HeaderDefBlock && "no definition at header of carrying loop");
|
|
|
|
for (const auto *ExitBlock : ReachedLoopExits) {
|
|
auto ItExitDef = DefMap.find(ExitBlock);
|
|
assert((ItExitDef != DefMap.end()) &&
|
|
"no reaching def at reachable loop exit");
|
|
if (ItExitDef->second != HeaderDefBlock) {
|
|
JoinBlocks->insert(ExitBlock);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return std::move(JoinBlocks);
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const ConstBlockSet &SyncDependenceAnalysis::join_blocks(const Loop &Loop) {
|
|
using LoopExitVec = SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 4>;
|
|
LoopExitVec LoopExits;
|
|
Loop.getExitBlocks(LoopExits);
|
|
if (LoopExits.size() < 1) {
|
|
return EmptyBlockSet;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// already available in cache?
|
|
auto ItCached = CachedLoopExitJoins.find(&Loop);
|
|
if (ItCached != CachedLoopExitJoins.end()) {
|
|
return *ItCached->second;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// compute all join points
|
|
DivergencePropagator Propagator{FuncRPOT, DT, PDT, LI};
|
|
auto JoinBlocks = Propagator.computeJoinPoints<const LoopExitVec &>(
|
|
*Loop.getHeader(), LoopExits, Loop.getParentLoop());
|
|
|
|
auto ItInserted = CachedLoopExitJoins.emplace(&Loop, std::move(JoinBlocks));
|
|
assert(ItInserted.second);
|
|
return *ItInserted.first->second;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const ConstBlockSet &
|
|
SyncDependenceAnalysis::join_blocks(const Instruction &Term) {
|
|
// trivial case
|
|
if (Term.getNumSuccessors() < 1) {
|
|
return EmptyBlockSet;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// already available in cache?
|
|
auto ItCached = CachedBranchJoins.find(&Term);
|
|
if (ItCached != CachedBranchJoins.end())
|
|
return *ItCached->second;
|
|
|
|
// compute all join points
|
|
DivergencePropagator Propagator{FuncRPOT, DT, PDT, LI};
|
|
const auto &TermBlock = *Term.getParent();
|
|
auto JoinBlocks = Propagator.computeJoinPoints<succ_const_range>(
|
|
TermBlock, successors(Term.getParent()), LI.getLoopFor(&TermBlock));
|
|
|
|
auto ItInserted = CachedBranchJoins.emplace(&Term, std::move(JoinBlocks));
|
|
assert(ItInserted.second);
|
|
return *ItInserted.first->second;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} // namespace llvm
|