1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-11-23 11:13:28 +01:00
llvm-mirror/test/Transforms/PhaseOrdering/scev-custom-dl.ll
Elena Demikhovsky 966bb89b1a Adding a width of the GEP index to the Data Layout.
Making a width of GEP Index, which is used for address calculation, to be one of the pointer properties in the Data Layout.
p[address space]:size:memory_size:alignment:pref_alignment:index_size_in_bits.
The index size parameter is optional, if not specified, it is equal to the pointer size.

Till now, the InstCombiner normalized GEPs and extended the Index operand to the pointer width.
It works fine if you can convert pointer to integer for address calculation and all registered targets do this.
But some ISAs have very restricted instruction set for the pointer calculation. During discussions were desided to retrieve information for GEP index from the Data Layout.
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120416.html

I added an interface to the Data Layout and I changed the InstCombiner and some other passes to take the Index width into account.
This change does not affect any in-tree target. I added tests to cover data layouts with explicitly specified index size.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42123

llvm-svn: 325102
2018-02-14 06:58:08 +00:00

68 lines
2.3 KiB
LLVM

; RUN: opt -O3 -S -analyze -scalar-evolution < %s | FileCheck %s
target datalayout = "e-m:m-p:40:64:64:32-i32:32-i16:16-i8:8-n32"
;
; This file contains phase ordering tests for scalar evolution.
; Test that the standard passes don't obfuscate the IR so scalar evolution can't
; recognize expressions.
; CHECK: test1
; The loop body contains two increments by %div.
; Make sure that 2*%div is recognizable, and not expressed as a bit mask of %d.
; CHECK: --> {%p,+,(8 * (%d /u 4))}
define void @test1(i32 %d, i32* %p) nounwind uwtable ssp {
entry:
%div = udiv i32 %d, 4
br label %for.cond
for.cond: ; preds = %for.inc, %entry
%p.addr.0 = phi i32* [ %p, %entry ], [ %add.ptr1, %for.inc ]
%i.0 = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.inc ]
%cmp = icmp ne i32 %i.0, 64
br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.end
for.body: ; preds = %for.cond
store i32 0, i32* %p.addr.0, align 4
%add.ptr = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %p.addr.0, i32 %div
store i32 1, i32* %add.ptr, align 4
%add.ptr1 = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %add.ptr, i32 %div
br label %for.inc
for.inc: ; preds = %for.body
%inc = add i32 %i.0, 1
br label %for.cond
for.end: ; preds = %for.cond
ret void
}
; CHECK: test1a
; Same thing as test1, but it is even more tempting to fold 2 * (%d /u 2)
; CHECK: --> {%p,+,(8 * (%d /u 2))}
define void @test1a(i32 %d, i32* %p) nounwind uwtable ssp {
entry:
%div = udiv i32 %d, 2
br label %for.cond
for.cond: ; preds = %for.inc, %entry
%p.addr.0 = phi i32* [ %p, %entry ], [ %add.ptr1, %for.inc ]
%i.0 = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.inc ]
%cmp = icmp ne i32 %i.0, 64
br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.end
for.body: ; preds = %for.cond
store i32 0, i32* %p.addr.0, align 4
%add.ptr = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %p.addr.0, i32 %div
store i32 1, i32* %add.ptr, align 4
%add.ptr1 = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %add.ptr, i32 %div
br label %for.inc
for.inc: ; preds = %for.body
%inc = add i32 %i.0, 1
br label %for.cond
for.end: ; preds = %for.cond
ret void
}