1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-11-23 19:23:23 +01:00
llvm-mirror/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/extract-lowbits-sameconstmask.ll
Roman Lebedev bccf832eec [NFC][SCEV] Add tests related to bit masking (PR37793)
Summary:
Related to https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37793, https://reviews.llvm.org/D46760#1127287

We'd like to do this canonicalization https://rise4fun.com/Alive/Gmc
But it is currently restricted by rL155136 / rL155362, which says:
```
    // This is a constant shift of a constant shift. Be careful about hiding
    // shl instructions behind bit masks. They are used to represent multiplies
    // by a constant, and it is important that simple arithmetic expressions
    // are still recognizable by scalar evolution.
    //
    // The transforms applied to shl are very similar to the transforms applied
    // to mul by constant. We can be more aggressive about optimizing right
    // shifts.
    //
    // Combinations of right and left shifts will still be optimized in
    // DAGCombine where scalar evolution no longer applies.
```

I think these tests show that for *constants*, SCEV has no issues with that canonicalization.

Reviewers: mkazantsev, spatel, efriedma, sanjoy

Reviewed By: mkazantsev

Subscribers: sanjoy, javed.absar, llvm-commits, stoklund, bixia

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48229

llvm-svn: 335101
2018-06-20 07:54:11 +00:00

49 lines
1.7 KiB
LLVM

; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_analyze_test_checks.py
; RUN: opt -S -analyze -scalar-evolution < %s | FileCheck %s
; The obvious case.
define i32 @mul(i32 %val) nounwind {
; CHECK-LABEL: 'mul'
; CHECK-NEXT: Classifying expressions for: @mul
; CHECK-NEXT: %tmp1 = mul i32 %val, 16
; CHECK-NEXT: --> (16 * %val) U: [0,-15) S: [-2147483648,2147483633)
; CHECK-NEXT: %tmp2 = udiv i32 %tmp1, 16
; CHECK-NEXT: --> ((16 * %val) /u 16) U: [0,268435456) S: [0,268435456)
; CHECK-NEXT: Determining loop execution counts for: @mul
;
%tmp1 = mul i32 %val, 16
%tmp2 = udiv i32 %tmp1, 16
ret i32 %tmp2
}
; Or, it could be any number of equivalent patterns with mask:
; a) x & (1 << nbits) - 1
; b) x & ~(-1 << nbits)
; c) x & (-1 >> (32 - y))
; d) x << (32 - y) >> (32 - y)
define i32 @mask_abc(i32 %val) nounwind {
; CHECK-LABEL: 'mask_abc'
; CHECK-NEXT: Classifying expressions for: @mask_abc
; CHECK-NEXT: %masked = and i32 %val, 15
; CHECK-NEXT: --> (zext i4 (trunc i32 %val to i4) to i32) U: [0,16) S: [0,16)
; CHECK-NEXT: Determining loop execution counts for: @mask_abc
;
%masked = and i32 %val, 15
ret i32 %masked
}
define i32 @mask_d(i32 %val) nounwind {
; CHECK-LABEL: 'mask_d'
; CHECK-NEXT: Classifying expressions for: @mask_d
; CHECK-NEXT: %highbitscleared = shl i32 %val, 4
; CHECK-NEXT: --> (16 * %val) U: [0,-15) S: [-2147483648,2147483633)
; CHECK-NEXT: %masked = lshr i32 %highbitscleared, 4
; CHECK-NEXT: --> ((16 * %val) /u 16) U: [0,268435456) S: [0,268435456)
; CHECK-NEXT: Determining loop execution counts for: @mask_d
;
%highbitscleared = shl i32 %val, 4
%masked = lshr i32 %highbitscleared, 4
ret i32 %masked
}