mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/rpcs3.git
synced 2024-11-22 02:32:36 +01:00
scheduler stuff
- more threads for rsx - better 1600
This commit is contained in:
parent
fcd702c8a6
commit
ab17b49e15
@ -1890,18 +1890,25 @@ u16 thread_ctrl::get_affinity_mask(thread_class group)
|
||||
}
|
||||
case native_core_arrangement::amd_ccx:
|
||||
{
|
||||
u16 primary_ccx_unit_mask;
|
||||
u16 spu_mask, ppu_mask, rsx_mask;
|
||||
if (thread_count >= 16)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Threadripper, R7
|
||||
// Assign threads 8-16
|
||||
// It appears some windows code is bound to lower core addresses, binding 8-16 is alot faster than 0-7
|
||||
primary_ccx_unit_mask = 0b1111111100000000;
|
||||
ppu_mask = spu_mask = 0b1111111100000000;
|
||||
rsx_mask = all_cores_mask;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (thread_count == 12)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// 1600/2600 (x)
|
||||
ppu_mask = spu_mask = 0b111111000000;
|
||||
rsx_mask = all_cores_mask;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
// R5 & R3 don't seem to improve performance no matter how these are shuffled (including 1600)
|
||||
primary_ccx_unit_mask = 0b11111111 & all_cores_mask;
|
||||
// R5 & R3 don't seem to improve performance no matter how these are shuffled
|
||||
ppu_mask = spu_mask = rsx_mask = 0b11111111 & all_cores_mask;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
switch (group)
|
||||
@ -1910,9 +1917,11 @@ u16 thread_ctrl::get_affinity_mask(thread_class group)
|
||||
case thread_class::general:
|
||||
return all_cores_mask;
|
||||
case thread_class::rsx:
|
||||
return rsx_mask;
|
||||
case thread_class::ppu:
|
||||
return ppu_mask;
|
||||
case thread_class::spu:
|
||||
return primary_ccx_unit_mask;
|
||||
return spu_mask;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
case native_core_arrangement::intel_ht:
|
||||
|
@ -142,8 +142,10 @@ namespace spu
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (remaining >= native_jiffy_duration_us)
|
||||
std::this_thread::sleep_for(1ms);
|
||||
else if (remaining > 100)
|
||||
std::this_thread::yield();
|
||||
else
|
||||
busy_wait(remaining);
|
||||
busy_wait();
|
||||
|
||||
const auto now = get_system_time();
|
||||
const auto elapsed = now - start;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user