2018-12-03 20:05:42 +01:00
|
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
2017-02-10 16:33:13 +01:00
|
|
|
//
|
2019-01-19 09:50:56 +01:00
|
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
|
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
|
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
2017-02-10 16:33:13 +01:00
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
2020-01-17 23:29:40 +01:00
|
|
|
// Automatically generated file, do not edit!
|
2017-12-11 19:57:54 +01:00
|
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-18 19:45:22 +02:00
|
|
|
def ArchV5: SubtargetFeature<"v5", "HexagonArchVersion", "Hexagon::ArchEnum::V5", "Enable Hexagon V5 architecture">;
|
[TableGen] Support combining AssemblerPredicates with ORs
For context, the proposed RISC-V bit manipulation extension has a subset
of instructions which require one of two SubtargetFeatures to be
enabled, 'zbb' or 'zbp', and there is no defined feature which both of
these can imply to use as a constraint either (see comments in D65649).
AssemblerPredicates allow multiple SubtargetFeatures to be declared in
the "AssemblerCondString" field, separated by commas, and this means
that the two features must both be enabled. There is no equivalent to
say that _either_ feature X or feature Y must be enabled, short of
creating a dummy SubtargetFeature for this purpose and having features X
and Y imply the new feature.
To solve the case where X or Y is needed without adding a new feature,
and to better match a typical TableGen style, this replaces the existing
"AssemblerCondString" with a dag "AssemblerCondDag" which represents the
same information. Two operators are defined for use with
AssemblerCondDag, "all_of", which matches the current behaviour, and
"any_of", which adds the new proposed ORing features functionality.
This was originally proposed in the RFC at
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-February/139138.html
Changes to all current backends are mechanical to support the replaced
functionality, and are NFCI.
At this stage, it is illegal to combine features with ands and ors in a
single AssemblerCondDag. I suspect this case is sufficiently rare that
adding more complex changes to support it are unnecessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74338
2020-03-13 18:13:51 +01:00
|
|
|
def HasV5 : Predicate<"HST->hasV5Ops()">, AssemblerPredicate<(all_of ArchV5)>;
|
2020-01-17 23:29:40 +01:00
|
|
|
def ArchV55: SubtargetFeature<"v55", "HexagonArchVersion", "Hexagon::ArchEnum::V55", "Enable Hexagon V55 architecture">;
|
[TableGen] Support combining AssemblerPredicates with ORs
For context, the proposed RISC-V bit manipulation extension has a subset
of instructions which require one of two SubtargetFeatures to be
enabled, 'zbb' or 'zbp', and there is no defined feature which both of
these can imply to use as a constraint either (see comments in D65649).
AssemblerPredicates allow multiple SubtargetFeatures to be declared in
the "AssemblerCondString" field, separated by commas, and this means
that the two features must both be enabled. There is no equivalent to
say that _either_ feature X or feature Y must be enabled, short of
creating a dummy SubtargetFeature for this purpose and having features X
and Y imply the new feature.
To solve the case where X or Y is needed without adding a new feature,
and to better match a typical TableGen style, this replaces the existing
"AssemblerCondString" with a dag "AssemblerCondDag" which represents the
same information. Two operators are defined for use with
AssemblerCondDag, "all_of", which matches the current behaviour, and
"any_of", which adds the new proposed ORing features functionality.
This was originally proposed in the RFC at
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-February/139138.html
Changes to all current backends are mechanical to support the replaced
functionality, and are NFCI.
At this stage, it is illegal to combine features with ands and ors in a
single AssemblerCondDag. I suspect this case is sufficiently rare that
adding more complex changes to support it are unnecessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74338
2020-03-13 18:13:51 +01:00
|
|
|
def HasV55 : Predicate<"HST->hasV55Ops()">, AssemblerPredicate<(all_of ArchV55)>;
|
2020-01-17 23:29:40 +01:00
|
|
|
def ArchV60: SubtargetFeature<"v60", "HexagonArchVersion", "Hexagon::ArchEnum::V60", "Enable Hexagon V60 architecture">;
|
[TableGen] Support combining AssemblerPredicates with ORs
For context, the proposed RISC-V bit manipulation extension has a subset
of instructions which require one of two SubtargetFeatures to be
enabled, 'zbb' or 'zbp', and there is no defined feature which both of
these can imply to use as a constraint either (see comments in D65649).
AssemblerPredicates allow multiple SubtargetFeatures to be declared in
the "AssemblerCondString" field, separated by commas, and this means
that the two features must both be enabled. There is no equivalent to
say that _either_ feature X or feature Y must be enabled, short of
creating a dummy SubtargetFeature for this purpose and having features X
and Y imply the new feature.
To solve the case where X or Y is needed without adding a new feature,
and to better match a typical TableGen style, this replaces the existing
"AssemblerCondString" with a dag "AssemblerCondDag" which represents the
same information. Two operators are defined for use with
AssemblerCondDag, "all_of", which matches the current behaviour, and
"any_of", which adds the new proposed ORing features functionality.
This was originally proposed in the RFC at
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-February/139138.html
Changes to all current backends are mechanical to support the replaced
functionality, and are NFCI.
At this stage, it is illegal to combine features with ands and ors in a
single AssemblerCondDag. I suspect this case is sufficiently rare that
adding more complex changes to support it are unnecessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74338
2020-03-13 18:13:51 +01:00
|
|
|
def HasV60 : Predicate<"HST->hasV60Ops()">, AssemblerPredicate<(all_of ArchV60)>;
|
2020-01-17 23:29:40 +01:00
|
|
|
def ArchV62: SubtargetFeature<"v62", "HexagonArchVersion", "Hexagon::ArchEnum::V62", "Enable Hexagon V62 architecture">;
|
[TableGen] Support combining AssemblerPredicates with ORs
For context, the proposed RISC-V bit manipulation extension has a subset
of instructions which require one of two SubtargetFeatures to be
enabled, 'zbb' or 'zbp', and there is no defined feature which both of
these can imply to use as a constraint either (see comments in D65649).
AssemblerPredicates allow multiple SubtargetFeatures to be declared in
the "AssemblerCondString" field, separated by commas, and this means
that the two features must both be enabled. There is no equivalent to
say that _either_ feature X or feature Y must be enabled, short of
creating a dummy SubtargetFeature for this purpose and having features X
and Y imply the new feature.
To solve the case where X or Y is needed without adding a new feature,
and to better match a typical TableGen style, this replaces the existing
"AssemblerCondString" with a dag "AssemblerCondDag" which represents the
same information. Two operators are defined for use with
AssemblerCondDag, "all_of", which matches the current behaviour, and
"any_of", which adds the new proposed ORing features functionality.
This was originally proposed in the RFC at
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-February/139138.html
Changes to all current backends are mechanical to support the replaced
functionality, and are NFCI.
At this stage, it is illegal to combine features with ands and ors in a
single AssemblerCondDag. I suspect this case is sufficiently rare that
adding more complex changes to support it are unnecessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74338
2020-03-13 18:13:51 +01:00
|
|
|
def HasV62 : Predicate<"HST->hasV62Ops()">, AssemblerPredicate<(all_of ArchV62)>;
|
2020-01-17 23:29:40 +01:00
|
|
|
def ArchV65: SubtargetFeature<"v65", "HexagonArchVersion", "Hexagon::ArchEnum::V65", "Enable Hexagon V65 architecture">;
|
[TableGen] Support combining AssemblerPredicates with ORs
For context, the proposed RISC-V bit manipulation extension has a subset
of instructions which require one of two SubtargetFeatures to be
enabled, 'zbb' or 'zbp', and there is no defined feature which both of
these can imply to use as a constraint either (see comments in D65649).
AssemblerPredicates allow multiple SubtargetFeatures to be declared in
the "AssemblerCondString" field, separated by commas, and this means
that the two features must both be enabled. There is no equivalent to
say that _either_ feature X or feature Y must be enabled, short of
creating a dummy SubtargetFeature for this purpose and having features X
and Y imply the new feature.
To solve the case where X or Y is needed without adding a new feature,
and to better match a typical TableGen style, this replaces the existing
"AssemblerCondString" with a dag "AssemblerCondDag" which represents the
same information. Two operators are defined for use with
AssemblerCondDag, "all_of", which matches the current behaviour, and
"any_of", which adds the new proposed ORing features functionality.
This was originally proposed in the RFC at
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-February/139138.html
Changes to all current backends are mechanical to support the replaced
functionality, and are NFCI.
At this stage, it is illegal to combine features with ands and ors in a
single AssemblerCondDag. I suspect this case is sufficiently rare that
adding more complex changes to support it are unnecessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74338
2020-03-13 18:13:51 +01:00
|
|
|
def HasV65 : Predicate<"HST->hasV65Ops()">, AssemblerPredicate<(all_of ArchV65)>;
|
2020-01-17 23:29:40 +01:00
|
|
|
def ArchV66: SubtargetFeature<"v66", "HexagonArchVersion", "Hexagon::ArchEnum::V66", "Enable Hexagon V66 architecture">;
|
[TableGen] Support combining AssemblerPredicates with ORs
For context, the proposed RISC-V bit manipulation extension has a subset
of instructions which require one of two SubtargetFeatures to be
enabled, 'zbb' or 'zbp', and there is no defined feature which both of
these can imply to use as a constraint either (see comments in D65649).
AssemblerPredicates allow multiple SubtargetFeatures to be declared in
the "AssemblerCondString" field, separated by commas, and this means
that the two features must both be enabled. There is no equivalent to
say that _either_ feature X or feature Y must be enabled, short of
creating a dummy SubtargetFeature for this purpose and having features X
and Y imply the new feature.
To solve the case where X or Y is needed without adding a new feature,
and to better match a typical TableGen style, this replaces the existing
"AssemblerCondString" with a dag "AssemblerCondDag" which represents the
same information. Two operators are defined for use with
AssemblerCondDag, "all_of", which matches the current behaviour, and
"any_of", which adds the new proposed ORing features functionality.
This was originally proposed in the RFC at
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-February/139138.html
Changes to all current backends are mechanical to support the replaced
functionality, and are NFCI.
At this stage, it is illegal to combine features with ands and ors in a
single AssemblerCondDag. I suspect this case is sufficiently rare that
adding more complex changes to support it are unnecessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74338
2020-03-13 18:13:51 +01:00
|
|
|
def HasV66 : Predicate<"HST->hasV66Ops()">, AssemblerPredicate<(all_of ArchV66)>;
|
2020-01-17 23:29:40 +01:00
|
|
|
def ArchV67: SubtargetFeature<"v67", "HexagonArchVersion", "Hexagon::ArchEnum::V67", "Enable Hexagon V67 architecture">;
|
[TableGen] Support combining AssemblerPredicates with ORs
For context, the proposed RISC-V bit manipulation extension has a subset
of instructions which require one of two SubtargetFeatures to be
enabled, 'zbb' or 'zbp', and there is no defined feature which both of
these can imply to use as a constraint either (see comments in D65649).
AssemblerPredicates allow multiple SubtargetFeatures to be declared in
the "AssemblerCondString" field, separated by commas, and this means
that the two features must both be enabled. There is no equivalent to
say that _either_ feature X or feature Y must be enabled, short of
creating a dummy SubtargetFeature for this purpose and having features X
and Y imply the new feature.
To solve the case where X or Y is needed without adding a new feature,
and to better match a typical TableGen style, this replaces the existing
"AssemblerCondString" with a dag "AssemblerCondDag" which represents the
same information. Two operators are defined for use with
AssemblerCondDag, "all_of", which matches the current behaviour, and
"any_of", which adds the new proposed ORing features functionality.
This was originally proposed in the RFC at
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-February/139138.html
Changes to all current backends are mechanical to support the replaced
functionality, and are NFCI.
At this stage, it is illegal to combine features with ands and ors in a
single AssemblerCondDag. I suspect this case is sufficiently rare that
adding more complex changes to support it are unnecessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74338
2020-03-13 18:13:51 +01:00
|
|
|
def HasV67 : Predicate<"HST->hasV67Ops()">, AssemblerPredicate<(all_of ArchV67)>;
|
