RPCS3/llvm-mirror
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-11-01 16:33:37 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
cf35a852f5
llvm-mirror/test/CodeGen/Generic/2008-02-04-Ctlz.ll

22 lines
896 B
LLVM
Raw Normal View History

Eliminate more uses of llvm-as and llvm-dis. llvm-svn: 81293
2009-09-09 02:09:15 +02:00
; RUN: llc < %s
Crashes LegalizeTypes with "Do not know how to expand the result of this operator!" (node: ctlz). llvm-svn: 46713
2008-02-04 19:07:02 +01:00
Teach LegalizeTypes how to expand and promote CTLZ, CTTZ and CTPOP. The expansion code differs from that in LegalizeDAG in that it chooses to take the CTLZ/CTTZ count from the Hi/Lo part depending on whether the Hi/Lo value is zero, not on whether CTLZ/CTTZ of Hi/Lo returned 32 (or whatever the width of the type is) for it. I made this change because the optimizers may well know that Hi/Lo is zero and exploit it. The promotion code for CTTZ also differs from that in LegalizeDAG: it uses an "or" to get the right result when the original value is zero, rather than using a compare and select. This also means the value doesn't need to be zero extended. llvm-svn: 47075
2008-02-13 19:01:53 +01:00
@.str = internal constant [14 x i8] c"%lld %d %d %d\00"
Crashes LegalizeTypes with "Do not know how to expand the result of this operator!" (node: ctlz). llvm-svn: 46713
2008-02-04 19:07:02 +01:00
Teach LegalizeTypes how to expand and promote CTLZ, CTTZ and CTPOP. The expansion code differs from that in LegalizeDAG in that it chooses to take the CTLZ/CTTZ count from the Hi/Lo part depending on whether the Hi/Lo value is zero, not on whether CTLZ/CTTZ of Hi/Lo returned 32 (or whatever the width of the type is) for it. I made this change because the optimizers may well know that Hi/Lo is zero and exploit it. The promotion code for CTTZ also differs from that in LegalizeDAG: it uses an "or" to get the right result when the original value is zero, rather than using a compare and select. This also means the value doesn't need to be zero extended. llvm-svn: 47075
2008-02-13 19:01:53 +01:00
define i32 @main(i64 %arg) nounwind {
Crashes LegalizeTypes with "Do not know how to expand the result of this operator!" (node: ctlz). llvm-svn: 46713
2008-02-04 19:07:02 +01:00
entry:
Teach LegalizeTypes how to expand and promote CTLZ, CTTZ and CTPOP. The expansion code differs from that in LegalizeDAG in that it chooses to take the CTLZ/CTTZ count from the Hi/Lo part depending on whether the Hi/Lo value is zero, not on whether CTLZ/CTTZ of Hi/Lo returned 32 (or whatever the width of the type is) for it. I made this change because the optimizers may well know that Hi/Lo is zero and exploit it. The promotion code for CTTZ also differs from that in LegalizeDAG: it uses an "or" to get the right result when the original value is zero, rather than using a compare and select. This also means the value doesn't need to be zero extended. llvm-svn: 47075
2008-02-13 19:01:53 +01:00
%tmp37 = tail call i64 @llvm.ctlz.i64( i64 %arg ) ; <i64> [#uses=1]
%tmp47 = tail call i64 @llvm.cttz.i64( i64 %arg ) ; <i64> [#uses=1]
%tmp57 = tail call i64 @llvm.ctpop.i64( i64 %arg ) ; <i64> [#uses=1]
%tmp38 = trunc i64 %tmp37 to i32 ; <i32>:0 [#uses=1]
%tmp48 = trunc i64 %tmp47 to i32 ; <i32>:0 [#uses=1]
%tmp58 = trunc i64 %tmp57 to i32 ; <i32>:0 [#uses=1]
%tmp40 = tail call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf( i8* noalias getelementptr ([14 x i8]* @.str, i32 0, i32 0), i64 %arg, i32 %tmp38, i32 %tmp48, i32 %tmp58 ) nounwind ; <i32> [#uses=0]
Crashes LegalizeTypes with "Do not know how to expand the result of this operator!" (node: ctlz). llvm-svn: 46713
2008-02-04 19:07:02 +01:00
ret i32 0
}
declare i32 @printf(i8* noalias , ...) nounwind
declare i64 @llvm.ctlz.i64(i64) nounwind readnone
Teach LegalizeTypes how to expand and promote CTLZ, CTTZ and CTPOP. The expansion code differs from that in LegalizeDAG in that it chooses to take the CTLZ/CTTZ count from the Hi/Lo part depending on whether the Hi/Lo value is zero, not on whether CTLZ/CTTZ of Hi/Lo returned 32 (or whatever the width of the type is) for it. I made this change because the optimizers may well know that Hi/Lo is zero and exploit it. The promotion code for CTTZ also differs from that in LegalizeDAG: it uses an "or" to get the right result when the original value is zero, rather than using a compare and select. This also means the value doesn't need to be zero extended. llvm-svn: 47075
2008-02-13 19:01:53 +01:00
declare i64 @llvm.cttz.i64(i64) nounwind readnone
declare i64 @llvm.ctpop.i64(i64) nounwind readnone
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink