While working on PR38197, I noticed that we don't make use of FADD/FMUL being able to commute the inputs to support the addps+movss -> addss style combine
llvm-svn: 337375
This reverts commit 55222c9183c6e07f53a54c4061677734f54feac1.
I missed that this patch has a dependency on https://reviews.llvm.org/D49219
that has not been approved yet.
llvm-svn: 337373
The signed/unsigned DOT instructions perform a dot-product on
quadtuplets from two source vectors and accumulate the result in
the destination register. The instructions come in two forms:
Vector form, e.g.
sdot z0.s, z1.b, z2.b - signed dot product on four 8-bit quad-tuplets,
accumulating results in 32-bit elements.
udot z0.d, z1.h, z2.h - unsigned dot product on four 16-bit quad-tuplets,
accumulating results in 64-bit elements.
Indexed form, e.g.
sdot z0.s, z1.b, z2.b[3] - signed dot product on four 8-bit quad-tuplets
with specified quadtuplet from second
source vector, accumulating results in 32-bit
elements.
udot z0.d, z1.h, z2.h[1] - dot product on four 16-bit quad-tuplets
with specified quadtuplet from second
source vector, accumulating results in 64-bit
elements.
llvm-svn: 337372
Summary: This is how it appears to be handled in GCC and it prevents a
"Unknown mismatch" error in the SelectionDAGBuilder.
Reviewers: venkatra, jyknight, jrtc27
Reviewed By: jyknight, jrtc27
Subscribers: eraman, fedor.sergeev, jrtc27, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49218
llvm-svn: 337370
This patch adds the following predicated instructions:
UDIV Unsigned divide active elements
UDIVR Unsigned divide active elements, reverse form.
SDIV Signed divide active elements
SDIVR Signed divide active elements, reverse form.
e.g.
udiv z0.s, p0/m, z0.s, z1.s
(unsigned divide active elements in z0 by z1, store result in z0)
sdivr z0.s, p0/m, z0.s, z1.s
(signed divide active elements in z1 by z0, store result in z0)
llvm-svn: 337369
Imagine we have a file with few sections, and one of them is .foo
with index N != 0.
Problem is that when llvm-objdump is given a -section=.foo parameter
it lists .foo as a section at index 0. That makes impossible to write
test cases which needs to find the index of the particular section,
while ignoring dumping of others.
The patch fixes that.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49372
llvm-svn: 337361
http://www.sco.com/developers/gabi/2003-12-17/ch4.eheader.html
says that e_shnum and/or e_shstrndx may have special values if
"the number of sections is greater than or equal to SHN_LORESERVE" or
"the section name string table section index is greater than or equal to SHN_LORESERVE (0xff00)"
Previously llvm-readobj was unable to dump such files, patch changes that.
I had to add a precompiled test case because it does not seem possible to
prepare a test using yaml2obj or llvm-mc (not clear how to make .shstrtab
to have index >= SHN_LORESERVE).
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49369
llvm-svn: 337360
This patch adds the following instructions:
MUL - multiply vectors, e.g.
mul z0.h, p0/m, z0.h, z1.h
- multiply with immediate, e.g.
mul z0.h, z0.h, #127
SMULH - signed multiply returning high half, e.g.
smulh z0.h, p0/m, z0.h, z1.h
UMULH - unsigned multiply returning high half, e.g.
umulh z0.h, p0/m, z0.h, z1.h
llvm-svn: 337358
I'm trying to restrict the MOVLHPS/MOVHLPS ISD nodes to SSE1 only. With SSE2 we can use unpcks. I believe this will allow some patterns to be cleaned up to require fewer bitcasts.
I've put in an odd isel hack to still select MOVHLPS instruction from the unpckh node to avoid changing tests and because movhlps is a shorter encoding. Ideally we'd do execution domain switching on this, but the operands are in the wrong order and are tied. We might be able to try a commute in the domain switching using custom code.
We already support domain switching for UNPCKLPD and MOVLHPS.
llvm-svn: 337348
Summary:
The Signal Processing Engine (SPE) is found on NXP/Freescale e500v1,
e500v2, and several e200 cores. This adds support targeting the e500v2,
as this is more common than the e500v1, and is in SoCs still on the
market.
This patch is very intrusive because the SPE is binary incompatible with
the traditional FPU. After discussing with others, the cleanest
solution was to make both SPE and FPU features on top of a base PowerPC
subset, so all FPU instructions are now wrapped with HasFPU predicates.
Supported by this are:
* Code generation following the SPE ABI at the LLVM IR level (calling
conventions)
* Single- and Double-precision math at the level supported by the APU.
Still to do:
* Vector operations
* SPE intrinsics
As this changes the Callee-saved register list order, one test, which
tests the precise generated code, was updated to account for the new
register order.
Reviewed by: nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44830
llvm-svn: 337347
This is the lead-up to having SPE codegen. Add the rest of the
instructions, along with MC tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44829
llvm-svn: 337346
The presence of these symbols in the symbol table can cause symbol type
mismatch errors (or undefined symbol errors on emulated TLS targets)
and they can't be ICF'd anyway.
llvm-svn: 337338
InstCombine has a cast transform that matches a cast-of-select:
Orig = cast (Src = select Cond TV FV)
And tries to replace it with a select which has the cast folded in:
NewSel = select Cond (cast TV) (cast FV)
The combiner does RAUW(Orig, NewSel), so any debug values for Orig would
survive the transform. But debug values for Src would be lost.
This patch teaches InstCombine to replace all debug uses of Src with
NewSel (taking care of doing any necessary DIExpression rewriting).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49270
llvm-svn: 337310
Summary:
The only thing he suggested that I've skipped here is the double-wide
multiply instructions. Multiply is an area I'm nervous about there being
some hidden data-dependent behavior, and it doesn't seem important for
any benchmarks I have, so skipping it and sticking with the minimal
multiply support that matches what I know is widely used in existing
crypto libraries. We can always add double-wide multiply when we have
clarity from vendors about its behavior and guarantees.
I've tried to at least cover the fundamentals here with tests, although
I've not tried to cover every width or permutation. I can add more tests
where folks think it would be helpful.
Reviewers: craig.topper
Subscribers: sanjoy, mcrosier, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49413
llvm-svn: 337308
Previously we were assuming whole program compilation. Now that
separate compilation is a thing we need to update this pass.
Firstly, it can no longer assert on the existence of malloc and free.
This functions might not be in the current translation unit. If we
need them then we will generate not imports for them.
Secondly the global helper function we create should be marked as
weak since we will be generating a separate copy in each translation
unit.
Finally the names of the symbols used must be unique and fixed since
they need to agree across translation units.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49263
llvm-svn: 337301
Add llvm-mca tests demonstrating how LEA instructions are currently modelled. Once this is working on btver2 I'll copy the test file to the other target directories.
llvm-svn: 337297
The Mips FastISel back-end does not extend i1 values while lowering icmp.
Ensure that we bail into DAG ISel when handling this case.
Patch by Dragan Mladjenovic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49290
llvm-svn: 337288
Once we resolved an undef in a function we can run Solve, which could
lead to finding a constant return value for the function, which in turn
could turn undefs into constants in other functions that call it, before
resolving undefs there.
Computationally the amount of work we are doing stays the same, just the
order we process things is slightly different and potentially there are
a few less undefs to resolve.
We are still relying on the order of functions in the IR, which means
depending on the order, we are able to resolve the optimal undef first
or not. For example, if @test1 comes before @testf, we find the constant
return value of @testf too late and we cannot use it while solving
@test1.
This on its own does not lead to more constants removed in the
test-suite, probably because currently we have to be very lucky to visit
applicable functions in the right order.
Maybe we manage to come up with a better way of resolving undefs in more
'profitable' functions first.
Reviewers: efriedma, mssimpso, davide
Reviewed By: efriedma, davide
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49385
llvm-svn: 337283
TTI::getMinMaxReductionCost typically can't handle pointer types - until this is changed its better to limit horizontal reduction to integer/float vector types only.
llvm-svn: 337280
Summary:
Part of the adjustCopiesBackFrom method wasn't correctly dealing with SubRange
intervals when updating.
2 changes. The first to ensure that bogus SubRange Segments aren't propagated when
encountering Segments of the form [1234r, 1234d:0) when preparing to merge value
numbers. These can be removed in this case.
The second forces a shrinkToUses call if SubRanges end on the copy index
(instead of just the parent register).
V2: Addressed review comments, plus MIR test instead of ll test
Subscribers: MatzeB, qcolombet, nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40308
Change-Id: I1d2b2b4beea802fce11da01edf71feb2064aab05
llvm-svn: 337273
This patch completes support for the following floating point
instructions that take FP immediates:
FADD* (addition)
FSUB (subtract)
FSUBR (subtract reverse form)
FMUL* (multiplication)
FMAX* (maximum)
FMAXNM (maximum number)
FMIN (maximum)
FMINNM (maximum number)
All operations are predicated and take a FP immediate operand,
e.g.
fadd z0.h, p0/m, z0.h, #0.5
fmin z0.s, p0/m, z0.s, #1.0
^___________^ (tied)
* Instructions added in a previous patch.
llvm-svn: 337272
If we are only extracting vector elements via EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT(s) we may be able to use SimplifyDemandedVectorElts to avoid unnecessary vector ops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49262
llvm-svn: 337258
The SPLICE instruction splices two vectors into one vector using a
predicate. It copies the active elements from the first vector, and
then fills the remaining elements with the low-numbered elements from
the second vector.
The instruction has the following form, e.g.
splice z0.b, p0, z0.b, z1.b
for 8-bit elements. It also supports 16, 32 and
64-bit elements.
llvm-svn: 337253
This patch adds an instruction that allows extracting
a vector from a pair of vectors, given an immediate index
that describes the element position to extract from.
The instruction has the following assembly:
ext z0.b, z0.b, z1.b, #imm
where #imm is an immediate between 0 and 255.
llvm-svn: 337251
The ta instruction will always trap, regardless of the value
of the integer condition codes. TRAPri is marked as using icc,
so we cannot use a pattern for TRAPri to implement ta 1, as
verify-machineinstrs can complain that icc is not defined.
Instead we implement ta 1 the same way as ta 5.
llvm-svn: 337236
This amounts to pretty ridiculous number of patterns. Ideally we'd canonicalize the X86ISD::VRNDSCALE earlier to reuse those patterns. I briefly looked into doing that, but some strict FP operations could still get converted to rint and nearbyint during isel. It's probably still worthwhile to look into. This patch is meant as a starting point to work from.
llvm-svn: 337234
