Summary:
When doing the conversion: MachineInst -> MCInst, we should ignore the
implicit operands, it will expose more opportunity for InstiAlias.
Reviewed By: steven.zhang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77118
Summary:
Currently, we set legalization action of `ISD::ROTL` vectors as
`Expand` in `PPCISelLowering`. However, we can exploit `vrl(b|h|w|d)`
to lower `ISD::ROTL` directly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71324
Similar to rL337966 - if the DAGCombiner's rotate matching was
working as expected, I don't think we'd see any test diffs here.
AArch only goes right, and PPC only goes left.
x86 has both, so no diffs there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50091
llvm-svn: 339359
The bug is visible in the constant-folded x86 tests. We can't use the
negated shift amount when the type is not power-of-2:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/US1r
...so in that case, use the regular lowering that includes a select
to guard against a shift-by-bitwidth. This path is improved by only
calculating the modulo shift amount once now.
Also, improve the rotate (with power-of-2 size) lowering to use
a negate rather than subtract from bitwidth. This improves the
codegen whether we have a rotate instruction or not (although
we can still see that we're not matching to a legal rotate in
all cases).
llvm-svn: 338592
If the DAGCombiner's rotate matching was working as expected,
I don't think we'd see any test diffs here.
This sidesteps the issue of custom lowering for rotates raised in PR38243:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38243
...by only dealing with legal operations.
llvm-svn: 337966
As discussed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-May/123292.htmlhttp://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-July/124400.html
We want to add rotate intrinsics because the IR expansion of that pattern is 4+ instructions,
and we can lose pieces of the pattern before it gets to the backend. Generalizing the operation
by allowing 2 different input values (plus the 3rd shift/rotate amount) gives us a "funnel shift"
operation which may also be a single hardware instruction.
Initially, I thought we needed to define new DAG nodes for these ops, and I spent time working
on that (much larger patch), but then I concluded that we don't need it. At least as a first
step, we have all of the backend support necessary to match these ops...because it was required.
And shepherding these through the IR optimizer is the primary concern, so the IR intrinsics are
likely all that we'll ever need.
There was also a question about converting the intrinsics to the existing ROTL/ROTR DAG nodes
(along with improving the oversized shift documentation). Again, I don't think that's strictly
necessary (as the test results here prove). That can be an efficiency improvement as a small
follow-up patch.
So all we're left with is documentation, definition of the IR intrinsics, and DAG builder support.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49242
llvm-svn: 337221
