This avoids warnings when included in a application that
uses -Wstrict-prototypes.
e.g: AsmPrinters.def:27:1: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes]
llvm-svn: 155997
Note that support for rvalue references does not imply support
for the full set of move-related STL operations.
I've preserved support for an odd little thing in insert() where
we're trying to support inserting a new element from an existing
one. If we actually want to support that, there's a lot more we
need to do: insert can call either grow or push_back, neither of
which is safe against this particular use pattern.
llvm-svn: 155979
Expressions for movw/movt don't always have an :upper16: or :lower16:
on them and that's ok. When they don't, it's just a plain [0-65536]
immediate result, effectively the same as a :lower16: variant kind.
rdar://10550147
llvm-svn: 155941
in order to avoid assertion failures in the register scavenger. The assertion
failures were “Bad machine code: Using an undefined physical register” and
“Bad machine code: MBB exits via unconditional fall-through but its successor
differs from its CFG successor!”.
llvm-svn: 155930
Previously, an unsupported/unknown assembler directive issued a warning.
That's generally unsafe, and inconsistent with the behaviour of pretty
much every system assembler. Now that the MC assemblers are mature
enough to be the default on multiple targets, it's reasonable to
issue errors for these.
For target or platform directives that need to stay warnings, we
should add explicit handlers for them in, e.g., ELFAsmParser.cpp,
DarwinAsmParser.cpp, et. al., and issue the warning there.
rdar://9246275
llvm-svn: 155926
The caller is already responsible for eating any additional input on the
line. Putting an additional EatToEndOfStatement() in ParseStatement()
causes an entire extra statement to be consumed when treating warnings
as errors. For example, test/MC/macros.s will assert() because the
.endmacro directive is missed as a result.
rdar://11355843
llvm-svn: 155925
This patch will optimize the following cases on X86
(a > b) ? (a-b) : 0
(a >= b) ? (a-b) : 0
(b < a) ? (a-b) : 0
(b <= a) ? (a-b) : 0
FROM
movl %edi, %ecx
subl %esi, %ecx
cmpl %edi, %esi
movl $0, %eax
cmovll %ecx, %eax
TO
xorl %eax, %eax
subl %esi, %edi
cmovll %eax, %edi
movl %edi, %eax
rdar: 10734411
llvm-svn: 155919
- Improved parameter names for clarity
- Added comments
- emitCommonSymbols should return void because its return value is not being
used anywhere
- Attempt to reduce the usage of the RelocationValueRef type. Restricts it
for a single goal and may serve as a step for eventual removal.
llvm-svn: 155908
The TargetPassManager's default constructor wants to initialize the PassManager
to 'null'. But it's illegal to bind a null reference to a null l-value. Make the
ivar a pointer instead.
PR12468
llvm-svn: 155902
- There's no point having a different type for the local and global symbol
tables.
- Renamed SymbolTable to GlobalSymbolTable to clarify the intention
- Improved const correctness where relevant
llvm-svn: 155898
<rdar://problem/11291436>.
This is a second attempt at a fix for this, the first was r155468. Thanks
to Chandler, Bob and others for the feedback that helped me improve this.
llvm-svn: 155866
Replace some assert() calls w/ actual diagnostics. In a perfect world,
there'd be range checks on these values long before things ever reached
this code. For now, though, issuing a better-late-than-never diagnostic
is still a big improvement over assert().
rdar://11347287
llvm-svn: 155851
This was exposed by SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/constpool.c.
The computed size of a basic block isn't always a multiple of its known
alignment, and that can introduce extra alignment padding after the
block.
<rdar://problem/11347135>
llvm-svn: 155845
Thanks to "Gabor Greif" <ggreif@gmail.com> for reporting this problem.
The configure flag should be --with-default-sysroot as documented, and
not --with-sysroot. The reason we don't want to define --with-sysroot
is that GCC has a configure flag by that name and it has a different
semantics.
llvm-svn: 155844
On x86-32, structure return via sret lets the callee pop the hidden
pointer argument off the stack, which the caller then re-pushes.
However if the calling convention is fastcc, then a register is used
instead, and the caller should not adjust the stack. This is
implemented with a check of IsTailCallConvention
X86TargetLowering::LowerCall but is now checked properly in
X86FastISel::DoSelectCall.
(this time, actually commit what was reviewed!)
llvm-svn: 155825
ARM BUILD_VECTORs created after type legalization cannot use i8 or i16
operands, since those types are not legal. Instead use i32 operands, which
will be implicitly truncated by the BUILD_VECTOR to match the element type.
llvm-svn: 155824
