- Duplicate some store patterns to their AVX forms!
- Catched a bug while restricting the patterns subtarget, fix it
and update a testcase to check it properly
llvm-svn: 138851
register dependency (rather than glue them together). This is general
goodness as it gives scheduler more freedom. However it is motivated by
a nasty bug in isel.
When a i64 sub is expanded to subc + sube.
libcall #1
\
\ subc
\ / \
\ / \
\ / libcall #2
sube
If the libcalls are not serialized (i.e. both have chains which are dag
entry), legalizer can serialize them in arbitrary orders. If it's
unlucky, it can force libcall #2 before libcall #1 in the above case.
subc
|
libcall #2
|
libcall #1
|
sube
However since subc and sube are "glued" together, this ends up being a
cycle when the scheduler combine subc and sube as a single scheduling
unit.
The right solution is to fix LegalizeType too chains the libcalls together.
However, LegalizeType is not processing nodes in order so that's harder than
it should be. For now, the move to physical register dependency will do.
rdar://10019576
llvm-svn: 138791
I don't really like the patterns, but I'm having trouble coming up with a
better way to handle them.
I plan on making other targets use the same legalization
ARM-without-memory-barriers is using... it's not especially efficient, but
if anyone cares, it's not that hard to fix for a given target if there's
some better lowering.
llvm-svn: 138621
SSE transition penalty. The pass is enabled through the "x86-use-vzeroupper"
llc command line option. This is only the first step (very naive and
conservative one) to sketch out the idea, but proper DFA is coming next
to allow smarter decisions. Comments and ideas now and in further commits
will be very appreciated.
llvm-svn: 138317
Fix base register type and canonicallize to the "ldm" spelling rather than
"ldmia." Add diagnostics for incorrect writeback token and out-of-range
registers.
llvm-svn: 137986
match splats in the form (splat (scalar_to_vector (load ...))) whenever
the load can be folded. All the logic and instruction emission is
working but because of PR8156, there are no ways to match loads, cause
they can never be folded for splats. Thus, the tests are XFAILed, but
I've tested and exercised all the logic using a relaxed version for
checking the foldable loads, as if the bug was already fixed. This
should work out of the box once PR8156 gets fixed since MayFoldLoad will
work as expected.
llvm-svn: 137810
vinsertf128 $1 + vpermilps $0, remove the old code that used to first
do the splat in a 128-bit vector and then insert it into a larger one.
This is better because the handling code gets simpler and also makes a
better room for the upcoming vbroadcast!
llvm-svn: 137807
there is no support for native 256-bit shuffles, be more smart in some
cases, for example, when you can extract specific 128-bit parts and use
regular 128-bit shuffles for them. Example:
For this shuffle:
shufflevector <4 x i64> %a, <4 x i64> %b, <4 x i32>
<i32 1, i32 0, i32 7, i32 6>
This was expanded to:
vextractf128 $1, %ymm1, %xmm2
vpextrq $0, %xmm2, %rax
vmovd %rax, %xmm1
vpextrq $1, %xmm2, %rax
vmovd %rax, %xmm2
vpunpcklqdq %xmm1, %xmm2, %xmm1
vpextrq $0, %xmm0, %rax
vmovd %rax, %xmm2
vpextrq $1, %xmm0, %rax
vmovd %rax, %xmm0
vpunpcklqdq %xmm2, %xmm0, %xmm0
vinsertf128 $1, %xmm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
ret
Now we get:
vshufpd $1, %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm0
vextractf128 $1, %ymm1, %xmm1
vshufpd $1, %xmm1, %xmm1, %xmm1
vinsertf128 $1, %xmm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
llvm-svn: 137733
Mips1 does not support double precision loads or stores, therefore two single
precision loads or stores must be used in place of these instructions. This
patch treats double precision loads and stores as if they are legal
instructions until MCInstLowering, instead of generating the single precision
instructions during instruction selection or Prolog/Epilog code insertion.
Without the changes made in this patch, llc produces code that has the same
problem described in r137484 or bails out when
MipsInstrInfo::storeRegToStackSlot or loadRegFromStackSlot is called before
register allocation.
llvm-svn: 137711
Apparently we never added code to expand these pseudo instructions, and in
over a year, no one has noticed. Our register allocator must be awesome!
llvm-svn: 137551
vectors. It operates on 128-bit elements instead of regular scalar
types. Recognize shuffles that are suitable for VPERM2F128 and teach
the x86 legalizer how to handle them.
llvm-svn: 137519
(for example, after integer operation), do not pack the registers into a YMM
before saving. Its better to save as two XMM registers.
Before:
vinsertf128 $1, %xmm3, %ymm0, %ymm3
vinsertf128 $0, %xmm1, %ymm3, %ymm1
vmovaps %ymm1, 416(%rsp)
After:
vmovaps %xmm3, 416+16(%rsp)
vmovaps %xmm1, 416(%rsp)
llvm-svn: 137308
data in-register prior to saving to memory. When we reorder the data in memory
we prevent the need to save multiple scalars to memory, making a single regular
store.
llvm-svn: 137238
def : Pat<(X86Movss VR128:$src1,
(bc_v4i32 (v2i64 (load addr:$src2)))),
(MOVLPSrm VR128:$src1, addr:$src2)>;
This matches a MOVSS dag with a MOVLPS instruction. However, MOVSS will replace only the low 32 bits of the register, while the MOVLPS instruction will replace the low 64 bits. A testcase is added and illustrates the bug and also modified the one that was already present. Patch by Tanya Lattner.
llvm-svn: 137227
Coalescing can remove copy-like instructions with sub-register operands
that constrained the register class. Examples are:
x86: GR32_ABCD:sub_8bit_hi -> GR32
arm: DPR_VFP2:ssub0 -> DPR
Recompute the register class of any virtual registers that are used by
less instructions after coalescing.
This affects code generation for the Cortex-A8 where we use NEON
instructions for f32 operations, c.f. fp_convert.ll:
vadd.f32 d16, d1, d0
vcvt.s32.f32 d0, d16
The register allocator is now free to use d16 for the temporary, and
that comes first in the allocation order because it doesn't interfere
with any s-registers.
llvm-svn: 137133
X86FloatingPoint keeps track of pending ST registers for an upcoming
inline asm instruction with fixed stack register constraints. It does
this by remembering which FP register holds the value that should appear
at a fixed stack position for the inline asm.
When that FP register is killed before the inline asm, make sure to
duplicate it to a scratch register, so the ST register still has a live
FP reference.
This could happen when the same FP register was copied to two ST
registers, or when a spill instruction is inserted between the ST copy
and the inline asm.
This fixes PR10602.
llvm-svn: 137050
