While I'm there, change code that does:
SomeTy == Type::getFooType(Context)
into:
SomeTy->getTypeID() == FooTyID
to decrease the amount of useless type creation which may involve locking, etc.
llvm-svn: 81846
input filename so that opt doesn't print the input filename in the
output so that grep lines in the tests don't unintentionally match
strings in the input filename.
llvm-svn: 81537
Update code generator to use this attribute and remove NoImplicitFloat target option.
Update llc to set this attribute when -no-implicit-float command line option is used.
llvm-svn: 72959
integer and floating-point opcodes, introducing
FAdd, FSub, and FMul.
For now, the AsmParser, BitcodeReader, and IRBuilder all preserve
backwards compatability, and the Core LLVM APIs preserve backwards
compatibility for IR producers. Most front-ends won't need to change
immediately.
This implements the first step of the plan outlined here:
http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/IntegerOverflow.txt
llvm-svn: 72897
The loop-deletion pass does not preserve dom frontier, which is required by
loop-index-split. When the PM checks dom frontier for loop-index-split, it has
already verified that lcssa is availalble. However, new dom frontier forces new
loop pass manager, which does not have lcssa yet.
The PM should recheck availability of required analysis passes in such cases.
llvm-svn: 54805
because opt exited while llvm-as was still
writing to the pipe, causing it to get a
SIGPIPE. It seems best to change things to
avoid the race altogether.
llvm-svn: 54138
are the same as in unpacked structs, only field
positions differ. This only matters for structs
containing x86 long double or an apint; it may
cause backwards compatibility problems if someone
has bitcode containing a packed struct with a
field of one of those types.
The issue is that only 10 bytes are needed to
hold an x86 long double: the store size is 10
bytes, but the ABI size is 12 or 16 bytes (linux/
darwin) which comes from rounding the store size
up by the alignment. Because it seemed silly not
to pack an x86 long double into 10 bytes in a
packed struct, this is what was done. I now
think this was a mistake. Reserving the ABI size
for an x86 long double field even in a packed
struct makes things more uniform: the ABI size is
now always used when reserving space for a type.
This means that developers are less likely to
make mistakes. It also makes life easier for the
CBE which otherwise could not represent all LLVM
packed structs (PR2402).
Front-end people might need to adjust the way
they create LLVM structs - see following change
to llvm-gcc.
llvm-svn: 51928
global variables that needed to be passed in. This makes it possible to
add new global variables with only a couple changes (Makefile and llvm-dg.exp)
instead of touching every single dg.exp file.
llvm-svn: 35918
