It solves issue of wrong section index evaluating for ranges when
base address is used.
Based on David Blaikie's patch D36097.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37214
llvm-svn: 312477
Teaches llvm-dwarfdump to print section index and name of range
when it dumps .debug_info.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36313
llvm-svn: 310915
Requires callers to directly associate relocations with a DataExtractor
used to read data from a DWARF section, which helps a callee not make
assumptions about which section it is reading.
This is the next step in reducing DWARFFormValue's dependence on DWARFUnit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34704
llvm-svn: 306699
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
With fix of uninitialized variable.
Original commit message:
This change is intended to use for LLD in D33183.
Problem we have in LLD when building .gdb_index is that we need to know section which address range belongs to.
Previously it was solved on LLD side by providing fake section addresses with use of llvm::LoadedObjectInfo
interface. We assigned file offsets as addressed. Then after obtaining ranges lists, for each range we had to find section ID's.
That not only was slow, but also complicated implementation and was the reason of incorrect behavior when
sections share the same offsets, like D33176 shows.
This patch makes DWARF parsers to return section index as well. That solves problem mentioned above.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33184
llvm-svn: 304078
This change is intended to use for LLD in D33183.
Problem we have in LLD when building .gdb_index is that we need to know section which address range belongs to.
Previously it was solved on LLD side by providing fake section addresses with use of llvm::LoadedObjectInfo
interface. We assigned file offsets as addressed. Then after obtaining ranges lists, for each range we had to find section ID's.
That not only was slow, but also complicated implementation and was the reason of incorrect behavior when
sections share the same offsets, like D33176 shows.
This patch makes DWARF parsers to return section index as well. That solves problem mentioned above.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33184
llvm-svn: 304002
With fix of test compilation.
Initial commit message:
This change is intended to use for LLD in D33183.
Problem we have in LLD when building .gdb_index is that we need to know section
which address range belongs to.
Previously it was solved on LLD side by providing fake section addresses
with use of llvm::LoadedObjectInfo interface. We assigned file offsets as addressed.
Then after obtaining ranges lists, for each range we had to find section ID's.
That not only was slow, but also complicated implementation and was the reason
of incorrect behavior when
sections share the same offsets, like D33176 shows.
This patch makes DWARF parsers to return section index as well.
That solves problem mentioned above.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33184
llvm-svn: 303983
This change is intended to use for LLD in D33183.
Problem we have in LLD when building .gdb_index is that we need to know section
which address range belongs to.
Previously it was solved on LLD side by providing fake section addresses
with use of llvm::LoadedObjectInfo interface. We assigned file offsets as addressed.
Then after obtaining ranges lists, for each range we had to find section ID's.
That not only was slow, but also complicated implementation and was the reason
of incorrect behavior when
sections share the same offsets, like D33176 shows.
This patch makes DWARF parsers to return section index as well.
That solves problem mentioned above.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33184
llvm-svn: 303978
Recommit of r303159 "[DWARF] - Use DWARFAddressRange struct instead of uint64_t pair for DWARFAddressRangesVector"
All places were shitched to use DWARFAddressRange now.
Suggested during review of D33184.
llvm-svn: 303163
I found this when investigated "Bug 32319 - .gdb_index is broken/incomplete" for LLD.
When we have object file with .debug_ranges section it may be filled with zeroes.
Relocations are exist in file to relocate this zeroes into real values later, but until that
a pair of zeroes is treated as terminator. And DWARF parser thinks there is no ranges at all
when I am trying to collect address ranges for building .gdb_index.
Solution implemented in this patch is to take relocations in account when parsing ranges.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32228
llvm-svn: 301170
In preparation for adding PDB support to LLVM, this moves the
DWARF parsing code to its own subdirectory under DebugInfo, and
renames LLVMDebugInfo to LLVMDebugInfoDWARF.
This is purely a mechanical / build system change.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7269
Reviewed by: Eric Christopher
llvm-svn: 227586
