Summary:
This has been superseded by "[AMDGPU]: PHI Elimination hooks added for custom COPY insertion."
This reverts the code changes from commit 53f967f2bdb6aa7b08596880c3689d1ecad6f0ff
but keeps the test case.
Reviewers: hliao, arsenm, tpr, dstuttard
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68769
llvm-svn: 374347
This is similar to D68086.
We are entering an infinite loop when dumping a histogram for a specially crafted
.hash section with a loop in a chain.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68771
llvm-svn: 374344
The command `od -t x` is used to dump data in hex format.
The LIT tests assumes that the hex characters are in lowercase.
However, there are also platforms which use uppercase letter.
To solve this issue the tests are updated to use the new
`--ignore-case` option of FileCheck.
Reviewers: Bigcheese, jakehehrlich, rupprecht, espindola, alexshap, jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68693
llvm-svn: 374343
Summary: It ensures that the bswap is generated even when a part of the subtree already matches a bswap transform.
Reviewers: craig.topper, efriedma, RKSimon, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68250
llvm-svn: 374340
The FileCheck utility is enhanced to support a `--ignore-case`
option. This is useful in cases where the output of Unix tools
differs in case (e.g. case not specified by Posix).
Reviewers: Bigcheese, jakehehrlich, rupprecht, espindola, alexshap, jhenderson, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68146
llvm-svn: 374339
This is just small refactoring to minimize changes in upcoming patch.
In the next path I'm going to introduce changes into heuristic for vectorization of "tiny trip count" loops.
Patch by Evgeniy Brevnov <evgueni.brevnov@gmail.com>
Reviewers: hsaito, Ayal, fhahn, reames
Reviewed By: hsaito
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67690
llvm-svn: 374338
Summary:
The implementation is fairly straight-forward and uses the same patterns
as the existing streams. The yaml form does not attempt to preserve the
data in the "gaps" that can be created by setting a larger-than-required
header or entry size in the stream header, because the existing consumer
(lldb) does not make use of the information in the gap in any way, and
attempting to preserve that would make the implementation more
complicated.
Reviewers: amccarth, jhenderson, clayborg
Subscribers: llvm-commits, lldb-commits, markmentovai, zturner, JosephTremoulet
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68645
llvm-svn: 374337
This selects MVE VQADD from the vector llvm.sadd.sat or llvm.uadd.sat
intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68566
llvm-svn: 374336
This test is not defined.
FAIL: LLVM-Unit :: ADT/./ADTTests/ArrayRefTest.SizeTSizedOperations (178 of 33926)
******************** TEST 'LLVM-Unit :: ADT/./ADTTests/ArrayRefTest.SizeTSizedOperations' FAILED ********************
Note: Google Test filter = ArrayRefTest.SizeTSizedOperations
[==========] Running 1 test from 1 test case.
[----------] Global test environment set-up.
[----------] 1 test from ArrayRefTest
[ RUN ] ArrayRefTest.SizeTSizedOperations
/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h:180:32: runtime error: applying non-zero offset 9223372036854775806 to null pointer
#0 0x5ae8dc in llvm::ArrayRef<char>::slice(unsigned long, unsigned long) const /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h:180:32
#1 0x5ae44c in (anonymous namespace)::ArrayRefTest_SizeTSizedOperations_Test::TestBody() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/unittests/ADT/ArrayRefTest.cpp:85:3
#2 0x928a96 in testing::Test::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2474:5
#3 0x929793 in testing::TestInfo::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2656:11
#4 0x92a152 in testing::TestCase::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:2774:28
#5 0x9319d2 in testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4649:43
#6 0x931416 in testing::UnitTest::Run() /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/src/gtest.cc:4257:10
#7 0x920ac3 in RUN_ALL_TESTS /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/unittest/googletest/include/gtest/gtest.h:2233:46
#8 0x920ac3 in main /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/utils/unittest/UnitTestMain/TestMain.cpp:50:10
#9 0x7f66135b72e0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202e0)
#10 0x472c19 in _start (/b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm_build_ubsan/unittests/ADT/ADTTests+0x472c19)
SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/ArrayRef.h:180:32 in
llvm-svn: 374327
EXPENSIVE_CHECKS build was failing on new test.
This is fixed by marking $ra register as undef.
Test now has -verify-machineinstrs to check for operand flags.
llvm-svn: 374320
Summary:
llvm-ar's mri-utf8.test test relies on the en_US.UTF-8 locale to be
installed for its last RUN line to work. If not installed, the unicode
string gets encoded (interpreted) as ascii which fails since the most
significant byte is non zero. This commit changes the test to only rely
on the system being able to encode the pound sign in its default
encoding (e.g. UTF-16 for Microsoft Windows) by always opening the file
via input/output redirection. This avoids forcing a given locale to be
present and supported. A Byte Order Mark is also added to help
recognizing the encoding of the file and its endianness.
Reviewers: gbreynoo, MaskRay, rupprecht, JamesNagurne, jfb
Subscribers: dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68472
llvm-svn: 374318
Currently, the heuristics the if-conversion pass uses for diamond if-conversion
are based on execution time, with no consideration for code size. This adds a
new set of heuristics to be used when optimising for code size.
This is mostly target-independent, because the if-conversion pass can
see the code size of the instructions which it is removing. For thumb,
there are a few passes (insertion of IT instructions, selection of
narrow branches, and selection of CBZ instructions) which are run after
if conversion and affect these heuristics, so I've added target hooks to
better predict the code-size effect of a proposed if-conversion.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67350
llvm-svn: 374301
Summary:
Quote from http://eel.is/c++draft/expr.add#4:
```
4 When an expression J that has integral type is added to or subtracted
from an expression P of pointer type, the result has the type of P.
(4.1) If P evaluates to a null pointer value and J evaluates to 0,
the result is a null pointer value.
(4.2) Otherwise, if P points to an array element i of an array object x with n
elements ([dcl.array]), the expressions P + J and J + P
(where J has the value j) point to the (possibly-hypothetical) array
element i+j of x if 0≤i+j≤n and the expression P - J points to the
(possibly-hypothetical) array element i−j of x if 0≤i−j≤n.
(4.3) Otherwise, the behavior is undefined.
```
Therefore, as per the standard, applying non-zero offset to `nullptr`
(or making non-`nullptr` a `nullptr`, by subtracting pointer's integral value
from the pointer itself) is undefined behavior. (*if* `nullptr` is not defined,
i.e. e.g. `-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks` was *not* specified.)
To make things more fun, in C (6.5.6p8), applying *any* offset to null pointer
is undefined, although Clang front-end pessimizes the code by not lowering
that info, so this UB is "harmless".
Since rL369789 (D66608 `[InstCombine] icmp eq/ne (gep inbounds P, Idx..), null -> icmp eq/ne P, null`)
LLVM middle-end uses those guarantees for transformations.
If the source contains such UB's, said code may now be miscompiled.
Such miscompilations were already observed:
* https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190826/687838.html
* https://github.com/google/filament/pull/1566
Surprisingly, UBSan does not catch those issues
... until now. This diff teaches UBSan about these UB's.
`getelementpointer inbounds` is a pretty frequent instruction,
so this does have a measurable impact on performance;
I've addressed most of the obvious missing folds (and thus decreased the performance impact by ~5%),
and then re-performed some performance measurements using my [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed ]] benchmark:
(all measurements done with LLVM ToT, the sanitizer never fired.)
* no sanitization vs. existing check: average `+21.62%` slowdown
* existing check vs. check after this patch: average `22.04%` slowdown
* no sanitization vs. this patch: average `48.42%` slowdown
Reviewers: vsk, filcab, rsmith, aaron.ballman, vitalybuka, rjmccall, #sanitizers
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, nickdesaulniers, nikic, ychen, dtzWill, xbolva00, dberris, arphaman, rupprecht, reames, regehr, llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67122
llvm-svn: 374293
Some clang lit tests use a pipeline of the form
// RUN: %clang [args] -O0 %s | opt [specific optimizations] | FileCheck %s
to make the expected test output depend on as few optimization phases
as possible, for stability. But when you write a RUN line of this
form, you lose the ability to use update_cc_test_checks.py to
automatically generate the expected output, because it only supports
two-stage pipelines consisting of '%clang | FileCheck' (or %clang_cc1).
This change extends the set of supported RUN lines so that pipelines
with an invocation of `opt` in the middle can still be automatically
handled.
To implement it, I've adjusted `get_function_body()` so that it can
cope with an arbitrary sequence of intermediate pipeline commands. But
the code that decides which RUN lines to consider is more
conservative: it only adds clang | opt | FileCheck to the set of
supported lines, because I didn't want to accidentally include some
other kind of line that doesn't output IR at all.
(Also in this commit is the minimal change to make this script work at
all, after r373912 added an extra parameter to `add_ir_checks`.)
Reviewers: MaskRay, xbolva00
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68406
llvm-svn: 374287
SGPR_128 only includes the real allocatable SGPRs, and SReg_128 adds
the additional non-allocatable TTMP registers. There's no point in
allocating SReg_128 vregs. This shrinks the size of the classes
regalloc needs to consider, which is usually good.
llvm-svn: 374284
Summary:
`null` in the default address space (=AS 0) cannot be captured nor can
it alias anything. We make this clear now as it can be important for
callbacks and other cases later on. In addition, this patch improves the
debug output for noalias deduction.
Reviewers: sstefan1, uenoku
Subscribers: hiraditya, bollu, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68624
llvm-svn: 374280
Original Patch broke for compilations w/ gcc and exposed asan fail.
This reland repairs those bugs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67529
llvm-svn: 374277
Summary:
Visual Studio doesn't like it while stepping. It kicks you out of the
source view of the file being stepped through and tries to fall back to
the disassembly view.
Fixes PR43530
The fix is incomplete, because it's possible to have a basic block with
no source locations at all. In this case, we don't emit a .cv_loc, but
that will result in wrong stepping behavior in the debugger if the
layout predecessor of the location-less BB has an unrelated source
location. We could try harder to find a valid location that dominates or
post-dominates the current BB, but in general it's a dataflow problem,
and one still might not exist. I left a FIXME about this.
As an alternative, we might want to consider having the middle-end check
if its emitting codeview and get it to stop using line zero.
Reviewers: akhuang
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68747
llvm-svn: 374267
As background, starting in D66309, I'm working on support unordered atomics analogous to volatile flags on normal LoadSDNode/StoreSDNodes for X86.
As part of that, I spent some time going through usages of LoadSDNode and StoreSDNode looking for cases where we might have missed a volatility check or need an atomic check. I couldn't find any cases that clearly miscompile - i.e. no test cases - but a couple of pieces in code loop suspicious though I can't figure out how to exercise them.
This patch adds defensive checks and asserts in the places my manual audit found. If anyone has any ideas on how to either a) disprove any of the checks, or b) hit the bug they might be fixing, I welcome suggestions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68419
llvm-svn: 374261
In a future patch, this will help cleanup m0 handling.
The register coalescer handles copies from a register that
materializes an immediate, but doesn't handle move immediates
itself. The virtual register uses will often be allocated to the same
register, so there end up being no real copy.
llvm-svn: 374257
This was ignoring the register bank of the input pointer, and
isUniformMMO seems overly aggressive.
This will now conservatively assume a VGPR in cases where the incoming
bank hasn't been determined yet (i.e. is from a loop phi).
llvm-svn: 374255
If original instruction did not have source modifiers they were
not added to the new DPP instruction as well, even if needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68729
llvm-svn: 374241
Summary:
This is necessary and sufficient to get simple cases of multiple
return working with multivalue enabled. More complex cases will
require block and loop signatures to be generalized to potentially be
type indices as well.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68684
llvm-svn: 374235
