compute the address space in the one place it was used.
Also write the getPointerAddressSpace member in terms of the
getPointerOperandType member.
llvm-svn: 167226
'@brief' doxygen markup to the now standard '\brief' markup form, in
conformance with the coding standards. This will let me continue to
write new comments in this form without making things inconsistent.
llvm-svn: 167225
politely and document this feature.
This simple API extension then allows us to write all of the
Instructions' address space query methods much more simply. No
functionality change intended here.
llvm-svn: 167223
r165941: Resubmit the changes to llvm core to update the functions to
support different pointer sizes on a per address space basis.
Despite this commit log, this change primarily changed stuff outside of
VMCore, and those changes do not carry any tests for correctness (or
even plausibility), and we have consistently found questionable or flat
out incorrect cases in these changes. Most of them are probably correct,
but we need to devise a system that makes it more clear when we have
handled the address space concerns correctly, and ideally each pass that
gets updated would receive an accompanying test case that exercises that
pass specificaly w.r.t. alternate address spaces.
However, from this commit, I have retained the new C API entry points.
Those were an orthogonal change that probably should have been split
apart, but they seem entirely good.
In several places the changes were very obvious cleanups with no actual
multiple address space code added; these I have not reverted when
I spotted them.
In a few other places there were merge conflicts due to a cleaner
solution being implemented later, often not using address spaces at all.
In those cases, I've preserved the new code which isn't address space
dependent.
This is part of my ongoing effort to clean out the partial address space
code which carries high risk and low test coverage, and not likely to be
finished before the 3.2 release looms closer. Duncan and I would both
like to see the above issues addressed before we return to these
changes.
llvm-svn: 167222
getIntPtrType support for multiple address spaces via a pointer type,
and also introduced a crasher bug in the constant folder reported in
PR14233.
These commits also contained several problems that should really be
addressed before they are re-committed. I have avoided reverting various
cleanups to the DataLayout APIs that are reasonable to have moving
forward in order to reduce the amount of churn, and minimize the number
of commits that were reverted. I've also manually updated merge
conflicts and manually arranged for the getIntPtrType function to stay
in DataLayout and to be defined in a plausible way after this revert.
Thanks to Duncan for working through this exact strategy with me, and
Nick Lewycky for tracking down the really annoying crasher this
triggered. (Test case to follow in its own commit.)
After discussing with Duncan extensively, and based on a note from
Micah, I'm going to continue to back out some more of the more
problematic patches in this series in order to ensure we go into the
LLVM 3.2 branch with a reasonable story here. I'll send a note to
llvmdev explaining what's going on and why.
Summary of reverted revisions:
r166634: Fix a compiler warning with an unused variable.
r166607: Add some cleanup to the DataLayout changes requested by
Chandler.
r166596: Revert "Back out r166591, not sure why this made it through
since I cancelled the command. Bleh, sorry about this!
r166591: Delete a directory that wasn't supposed to be checked in yet.
r166578: Add in support for getIntPtrType to get the pointer type based
on the address space.
llvm-svn: 167221
When target costs are available, use them to account for the costs of
shuffles on internal edges of the DAG of candidate pairs.
Because the shuffle costs here are currently for only the internal edges,
the current target cost model is trivial, and the chain depth requirement
is still in place, I don't yet have an easy test
case. Nevertheless, by looking at the debug output, it does seem to do the right
think to the effective "size" of each DAG of candidate pairs.
llvm-svn: 167217
Explicitly allow composition of null sub-register indices, and handle
that common case in an inlinable stub.
Use a compressed table implementation instead of the previous nested
switches which generated pretty bad code.
llvm-svn: 167190
The adc/sbb optimization is to able to convert following expression
into a single adc/sbb instruction:
(ult) ... = x + 1 // where the ult is unsigned-less-than comparison
(ult) ... = x - 1
This change is to flip the "x >u y" (i.e. ugt comparison) in order
to expose the adc/sbb opportunity.
llvm-svn: 167180
- Use value handle tricks to communicate use replacements instead of forgetLoop, this is a lot faster.
- Move the "big hammer" out of the main loop so it's not called for every instruction.
This should recover most (if not all) compile time regressions introduced by this code.
llvm-svn: 167136
These tests were all failing since the old JIT doesn't work
for PowerPC (any more), and there are no plans to attempt to
fix it again (instead, work focuses on MCJIT).
llvm-svn: 167133
BBVectorize would, except for loads and stores, always fuse instructions
so that the first instruction (in the current source order) would always
represent the low part of the input vectors and the second instruction
would always represent the high part. This lead to too many shuffles
being produced because sometimes the opposite order produces fewer of them.
With this change, BBVectorize tracks the kind of pair connections that form
the DAG of candidate pairs, and uses that information to reorder the pairs to
avoid excess shuffles. Using this information, a future commit will be able
to add VTTI-based shuffle costs to the pair selection procedure. Importantly,
the number of remaining shuffles can now be estimated during pair selection.
There are some trivial instruction reorderings in the test cases, and one
simple additional test where we certainly want to do a reordering to
avoid an unnecessary shuffle.
llvm-svn: 167122
By propagating the value for the switch condition, LLVM can now build
lookup tables for code such as:
switch (x) {
case 1: return 5;
case 2: return 42;
case 3: case 4: case 5:
return x - 123;
default:
return 123;
}
Given that x is known for each case, "x - 123" becomes a constant for
cases 3, 4, and 5.
llvm-svn: 167115
