[Recommitting now an unrelated assertion in SROA is sorted out]
The new version has several advantages:
1) IMSHO it's more readable and neater
2) It handles loads and stores properly
3) It can handle any number of incoming blocks rather than just two. I'll be taking advantage of this in a followup patch.
With this change we can now finally sink load-modify-store idioms such as:
if (a)
return *b += 3;
else
return *b += 4;
=>
%z = load i32, i32* %y
%.sink = select i1 %a, i32 5, i32 7
%b = add i32 %z, %.sink
store i32 %b, i32* %y
ret i32 %b
When this works for switches it'll be even more powerful.
Round 4. This time we should handle all instructions correctly, and not replace any operands that need to be constant with variables.
This was really hard to determine safely, so the helper function should be put into the Instruction API. I'll do that as a followup.
llvm-svn: 279460
__guard_local is defined as long on OpenBSD. If the source file contains
a definition of __guard_local, it mismatches with the int8 pointer type
used in LLVM. In that case, Module::getOrInsertGlobal() returns a
cast operation instead of a GlobalVariable. Trying to set the
visibility on the cast operation leads to random segfaults (seen when
compiling the OpenBSD kernel, which also runs with stack protection).
In the kernel, the hidden attribute does not matter. For userspace code,
__guard_local is defined as hidden in the startup code. If a program
re-defines __guard_local, the definition from the startup code will
either win or the linker complains about multiple definitions
(depending on whether the re-defined __guard_local is placed in the
common segment or not).
It also matches what gcc on OpenBSD does.
Thanks Stefan Kempf <sisnkemp@gmail.com> for the patch!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D23674
llvm-svn: 279449
Summary: We can allow sinking if the single user block has only one unique predecessor, regardless of the number of edges. Note that a switch statement with multiple cases can have the same destination.
Reviewers: mcrosier, majnemer, spatel, reames
Subscribers: reames, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23722
llvm-svn: 279448
The new version has several advantages:
1) IMSHO it's more readable and neater
2) It handles loads and stores properly
3) It can handle any number of incoming blocks rather than just two. I'll be taking advantage of this in a followup patch.
With this change we can now finally sink load-modify-store idioms such as:
if (a)
return *b += 3;
else
return *b += 4;
=>
%z = load i32, i32* %y
%.sink = select i1 %a, i32 5, i32 7
%b = add i32 %z, %.sink
store i32 %b, i32* %y
ret i32 %b
When this works for switches it'll be even more powerful.
Round 4. This time we should handle all instructions correctly, and not replace any operands that need to be constant with variables.
This was really hard to determine safely, so the helper function should be put into the Instruction API. I'll do that as a followup.
llvm-svn: 279443
Assembler directives .dtprelword, .dtpreldword, .tprelword, and
.tpreldword generates relocations R_MIPS_TLS_DTPREL32, R_MIPS_TLS_DTPREL64,
R_MIPS_TLS_TPREL32, and R_MIPS_TLS_TPREL64 respectively.
The main motivation for this patch is to be able to write test cases
for checking correctness of the LLD linker's behaviour.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23669
llvm-svn: 279439
It use to be non-const for the sole purpose of custom handling of
commons symbol. This is moved now in the regular LTO handling now
and such we can constify the callback.
llvm-svn: 279438
This change cause performance regression on MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-flt/Symbolics-flt from LNT and some other bechmarks.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D18777 for details.
llvm-svn: 279433
This change needs to be reverted in order to revert -r278267 which cause performance regression on MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-flt/Symbolics-flt from LNT and some other bechmarks.
See comments on https://reviews.llvm.org/D18777 for details.
llvm-svn: 279432
As discussed on PR26491, we are missing the opportunity to make use of the smaller MOVHLPS instruction because we set both arguments of a SHUFPD when using it to lower a single input shuffle.
This patch sets the lowered argument to UNDEF if that shuffle element is undefined. This in turn makes it easier for target shuffle combining to decode UNDEF shuffle elements, allowing combines to MOVHLPS to occur.
A fix to match against MOVHPD stores was necessary as well.
This builds on the improved MOVLHPS/MOVHLPS lowering and memory folding support added in D16956
Adding similar support for SHUFPS will have to wait until have better support for target combining of binary shuffles.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23027
llvm-svn: 279430
This tries to keep all the ModRM memory and register forms in their own regions of the encodings. Hoping to make it simple on some of the switch statements that operate on these encodings.
llvm-svn: 279422
The gold-plugin was doing this internally, now the API is handling
commons correctly based on the given resolution.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23739
llvm-svn: 279417
Summary: r279379 introduced crash on arm 32bit bot. I suspect this is alignment issue.
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: llvm-commits, aemerson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23762
llvm-svn: 279413
The callers still have ConstantInt guards, so there is no functional change
intended from this change. But relaxing the callers will allow more folds
for vector types.
llvm-svn: 279396
In some cases, FastIsel was emitting TEST instruction with K reg input, which is illegal.
Changed to using KORTEST when dealing with K regs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23163
llvm-svn: 279393
This fixes the crash from PR29072, where the MachineBasicBlock::iterator
wasn't being properly checked against MachineBasicBlock::end() before
iterating. This was another bug exposed by the new
ilist::iterator::operator*() assertion from r279314.
This testcase is poor quality. bugpoint couldn't reduce any further,
and I haven't had time to dig into what's going on so I can't invent a
better one. I didn't even get good CHECK lines in: this is just a
crasher.
I'm committing anyway since this is a real crash with an obvious fix,
but I'll leave PR29072 open and ask an ARM maintainer to help improve
the testcase.
llvm-svn: 279391
