The defined registers are already serialized - they are represented by placing
them before the '=' in a machine instruction. However, certain instructions like
INLINEASM can have defined register operands after the '=', so this commit
introduces the 'def' register flag for such operands.
llvm-svn: 245480
Reintroduce r245442. Remove an overly conservative assertion introduced
in r245442. We could replace the assertion to use `shareSameRegisterFile`
instead, but in that point in `insertPHI` we already lost the original
Def subreg to check against. So drop the assertion completely.
Original commit message:
- Teaches the ValueTracker in the PeepholeOptimizer to look through PHI
instructions.
- Add findNextSourceAndRewritePHI method to lookup into multiple sources
returnted by the ValueTracker and rewrite PHIs with new sources.
With these changes we can find more register sources and rewrite more
copies to allow coaslescing of bitcast instructions. Hence, we eliminate
unnecessary VR64 <-> GR64 copies in x86, but it could be extended to
other archs by marking "isBitcast" on target specific instructions. The
x86 example follows:
A:
psllq %mm1, %mm0
movd %mm0, %r9
jmp C
B:
por %mm1, %mm0
movd %mm0, %r9
jmp C
C:
movd %r9, %mm0
pshufw $238, %mm0, %mm0
Becomes:
A:
psllq %mm1, %mm0
jmp C
B:
por %mm1, %mm0
jmp C
C:
pshufw $238, %mm0, %mm0
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11197
rdar://problem/20404526
llvm-svn: 245479
Since r244955, we try to use the short-form ErrorInfo when both
tries failed, and the long-form match failed on a suffix operand.
However, this means we sometimes mix ErrorInfo and MatchResult
(one manifestation of this being PR24498). Instead, restore both.
llvm-svn: 245469
Rewrite some code to not use a lambda function. The non-lambda code is just
about as clean as the original, and not any longer. The lambda function causes
an internal compiler error in GCC 4.8.0, and it is not worth breaking support
for that compiler over this. NFC.
llvm-svn: 245466
This patch updates the X86 lowering so that the Exception Pointer and Selector
are 64-bit wide only if Subtarget.isTarget64BitLP64.
Patch by João Porto
Reviewers: dschuff, rnk
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12111
llvm-svn: 245454
Reapply r243486.
- Teaches the ValueTracker in the PeepholeOptimizer to look through PHI
instructions.
- Add findNextSourceAndRewritePHI method to lookup into multiple sources
returnted by the ValueTracker and rewrite PHIs with new sources.
With these changes we can find more register sources and rewrite more
copies to allow coaslescing of bitcast instructions. Hence, we eliminate
unnecessary VR64 <-> GR64 copies in x86, but it could be extended to
other archs by marking "isBitcast" on target specific instructions. The
x86 example follows:
A:
psllq %mm1, %mm0
movd %mm0, %r9
jmp C
B:
por %mm1, %mm0
movd %mm0, %r9
jmp C
C:
movd %r9, %mm0
pshufw $238, %mm0, %mm0
Becomes:
A:
psllq %mm1, %mm0
jmp C
B:
por %mm1, %mm0
jmp C
C:
pshufw $238, %mm0, %mm0
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11197
rdar://problem/20404526
llvm-svn: 245442
Summary:
The mid-end was generating vector smin/smax/umin/umax nodes, but
we were using vbsl to generatate the code. This adds the vmin/vmax
patterns and a test to check that we are now generating vmin/vmax
instructions.
Reviewers: rengolin, jmolloy
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12105
llvm-svn: 245439
There are some cases where the mul sequence is smaller, but for the most part,
using a div is preferable. This does not apply to vectors, since x86 doesn't
have vector idiv, and a vector mul/shifts sequence ought to be smaller than a
scalarized division.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12082
llvm-svn: 245431
This removes the isPow2SDivCheap() query, as it is not currently used in
any meaningful way. isIntDivCheap() no longer relies on a state variable
(as all in-tree target set it to false), but the interface allows querying
based on the type optimization level.
NFC.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12082
llvm-svn: 245430
without *requiring* it.
This allows a pass indicate that it will use an analysis if available
(through getAnalysisIfAvailable). When the pass manager knows this, it
will refrain from deleting that analysis if it can. Naturally, it will
still get invalidated at the correct time. These passes are not
considered when scheduling the pass pipeline, so typically they will
require manual scheduling, but this may also allow passes with
getAnalysisIfAvailable to find the analysis more often if nothing after
them requires that analysis and it wasn't invalidated.
I don't have a particular use case with the current passes, but with my
new structure for alias analyses, this will be very useful. We want to
allow people to customize the set of AAs available by scheduling
additional passes. These's aren't ever *required* for obvious reasons.
So we need some way to mark in the legacy pass manager that they will
still be used if available.
This is essentially how analysis groups already work. But this makes the
feature generally available and more explicit. It should allow the AA
change to not impact how people trigger a custom alias analysis being
available at a certain point in compilation.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12114
llvm-svn: 245409
Fix how DependenceAnalysis calls delinearization, mirroring what is done in
Delinearization.cpp (mostly by making sure to call getSCEVAtScope before
delinearizing, and by removing the unnecessary 'Pairs == 1' check).
Patch by Vaivaswatha Nagaraj!
llvm-svn: 245408
Here we make ScalarEvolution::isKnownPredicate, indirectly, a little smarter.
Given some relational comparison operator OP, and two AddRec SCEVs, {I,+,S} OP
{J,+,T}, we can reduce this to the comparison I OP J when S == T, both AddRecs
are for the same loop, and both are known not to wrap.
As it turns out, because of the way that backedge-guard expressions can be
leveraged when computing known predicates, this allows indvars to simplify the
if-statement comparison in this loop:
void foo (int *a, int *b, int n) {
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
if (i > n)
a[i] = b[i] + 1;
}
}
which, somewhat surprisingly, we were not previously optimizing away.
llvm-svn: 245400
This commit adds support for bit mask target flag serialization to the MIR
printer and the MIR parser. It also adds support for the machine operand's
target flag serialization to the AArch64 target.
Reviewers: Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
llvm-svn: 245383
This consolidates use of isUnalignedMem32Slow() in one place.
There is a slight change in logic although I'm not sure that it would ever
come up in the real world: we were assuming that an alignment of the type
size is always fast; now, we actually check the data layout to confirm that.
llvm-svn: 245382
Remove support for Valgrind-based TSan, which hasn't been maintained for a
few years. We now use the TSan annotations only if LLVM is compiled with
-fsanitize=thread. We no longer need the weak function definitions as we
are guaranteed that our program is linked directly with the TSan runtime.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12121
llvm-svn: 245374
method.
This commit extracts the code that parses the stack object references into a
new method named 'parseStackFrameIndex', so that it can be reused when
parsing standalone stack object references.
llvm-svn: 245370
To properly handle this, define the *a instructions as separate
instruction classes by refactoring the LoadA and StoreA multiclasses.
Move the instruction tests into the sparcv9 file to test the difference.
llvm-svn: 245360
The current code normalizes select(C0, x, select(C1, x, y)) towards
select(C0|C1, x, y) if the targets prefers that form. This patch adds an
additional rule that if the select(C1, x, y) part already exists in the
function then we want to normalize into the other direction because the
effects of reusing the existing value are bigger than transforming into
the target preferred form.
This addresses regressions following r238793, see also:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20150727/290272.html
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11616
llvm-svn: 245350
