Summary:
I recently added a new Fixup kind to our fork of LLVM but forgot to add
it to the table in MipsAsmBackend.cpp. With this static_assert the error
would have been caught instead of zero-initializing the array entries for
the new fixups.
Reviewers: sdardis, atanasyan
Reviewed By: atanasyan
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44895
llvm-svn: 328616
We check `canPeel` twice: when evaluating the number of iterations to be peeled
and within the method `peelLoop` that performs peeling. This method is only
executed if the calculated peel count is positive. Thus, the check in `peelLoop` can
never fail. This patch replaces this check with an assert.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44919
Reviewed By: fhahn
llvm-svn: 328615
As a follow-up to r328480, this updates the logic for the decreasing
safety checks in a similar manner:
- CanBeMax is replaced by CannotBeMaxInLoop which queries
isLoopEntryGuardedByCond on the maximum value.
- SumCanReachMin is replaced by isSafeDecreasingBound which includes
some logic from parseLoopStructure and, again, has been updated to
use isLoopEntryGuardedByCond on the given bounds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44776
llvm-svn: 328613
Currently, `getExact` fails if it sees two exit counts in different blocks. There is
no solid reason to do so, given that we only calculate exact non-taken count
for exiting blocks that dominate latch. Using this fact, we can simply take min
out of all exits of all blocks to get the exact taken count.
This patch makes the calculation more optimistic with enforcing our assumption
with asserts. It allows us to calculate exact backedge taken count in trivial loops
like
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
if (i > 50) break;
. . .
}
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44676
Reviewed By: fhahn
llvm-svn: 328611
This patch teaches `computeConstantDifference` handle calculation of constant
difference between `(X + C1)` and `(X + C2)` which is `(C2 - C1)`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43759
Reviewed By: anna
llvm-svn: 328609
Summary:
This patch adds itinerary support to the schedcover.py script. I've been trying to use this script to figure out why SSE and AVX instructions are ending up in separate tablegen scheduler classes and sometimes its because we are using different itineraries.
Rather than using None to indicate the default scheduler model, I now use the string "default". I had to hack around the sorting a little to keep "default" at the beginning. But this also makes it so you can specify "default" on the command line to just get the defaults
I also fixed the regular expression code so that the no_default wasn't evaluated twice.
Reviewers: RKSimon, atrick, jmolloy, javed.absar
Reviewed By: javed.absar
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44834
llvm-svn: 328608
Summary:
This reverts commit r328596.
Checking if the arguments are strings before testing if they contain "/dev/null".
Reviewers: rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: delcypher, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44914
llvm-svn: 328603
Before this change, using dumpProperties() with PDBSymbolData
would look like this:
get_locationType: 3
1
After this change:
get_locationType: 3
get_value: 1
llvm-svn: 328590
Currently CRC32 instructions use the WriteFAdd class, this patch splits them off into their own, at the moment it is still mostly just a duplicate of WriteFAdd but it can now be tweaked on a target by target basis.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44647
llvm-svn: 328582
Goma[1] is a distributed build system similar to distcc and icecc
primarily used to compile Chromium. The client is open source, and
hopefully soon the server will be as well. The intended usage model is
similar to most distributed build systems: prefix gomacc onto your
compiler command line, and it transparently distributes compilation.
The go lit config wants to determine the host compiler binary, so it
needs some extra logic to avoid looking at these prefixes.
[1] https://chromium.googlesource.com/infra/goma/client/
llvm-svn: 328580
MemorySSAUpdater::getPreviousDefRecursive is a recursive algorithm, for
each block, it computes the previous definition for each predecessor,
then takes those definitions and combines them. But currently it doesn't
remember results which it already computed; this means it can visit the
same block multiple times, which adds up to exponential time overall.
To fix this, this patch adds a cache. If we computed the result for a
block already, we don't need to visit it again because we'll come up
with the same result. Well, unless we RAUW a MemoryPHI; in that case,
the TrackingVH will be updated automatically.
This matches the original source paper for this algorithm.
The testcase isn't really a test for the bug, but it adds coverage for
the case where tryRemoveTrivialPhi erases an existing PHI node. (It's
hard to write a good regression test for a performance issue.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44715
llvm-svn: 328577
Summary:
Re-lands r328386 and r328443, reverting r328482.
Incorporates fixes from @mstorsjo in D44876 (thanks!) so that small
parameters in i8 and i16 do not end up in the SysV register parameters
(EDI, ESI, etc).
I added tests for how we receive small parameters, since that is the
important part. It's always safe to store more bytes than will be read,
but the assumptions you make when loading them are what really matter.
I also tested this by self-hosting clang and it passed tests on win64.
Reviewers: mstorsjo, hans
Subscribers: hiraditya, mstorsjo, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44900
llvm-svn: 328570
Give the bit count instructions their own scheduler classes instead of forcing them into existing classes.
These were mostly overridden anyway, but I had to add in costs from Agner for silvermont and znver1 and the Fam16h SoG for btver2 (Jaguar).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44879
llvm-svn: 328566
Summary:
r327219 added wrappers to std::sort which randomly shuffle the container before sorting.
This will help in uncovering non-determinism caused due to undefined sorting
order of objects having the same key.
To make use of that infrastructure we need to invoke llvm::sort instead of std::sort.
Note: This patch is one of a series of patches to replace *all* std::sort to llvm::sort.
Refer the comments section in D44363 for a list of all the required patches.
Reviewers: dblaikie, RKSimon, robertlytton
Reviewed By: robertlytton
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44875
llvm-svn: 328564
This has been made obsolete by the fact that almost all of the
things it previously checked for are no longer relevant since
we can just compare bytes in a lot of places.
llvm-svn: 328562
Legalize and emit code for quad-precision floating point operation xscvdpqp
and add option to guard the quad precision operation support.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44746
llvm-svn: 328558
A new function getOpcodeForSpill should now be the only place to get
the opcode for a given spilled register.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43086
llvm-svn: 328556
First, we change the heuristic that is used to ignore the recurrent
node-sets in the node ordering. In certain cases it's not important
to focus on the recurrent node-sets. Instead, the algorithm begins
by considering all the instructions in the node ordering step.
Second, a minor change to the bottom up traversal, which needs to
consider loop carried dependences (modeled as anti dependences).
Previously, these instructions were skipped, which caused problems
because the instruction ends up having both predecessors and
sucessors in the schedule.
Third, consider anti-dependences as a tie breaker when choosing
between instructions in the node ordering. We want to make sure
that the source of the anti-dependence does not end up with both
predecesssors and sucessors in the final node ordering.
Patch by Brendon Cahoon.
llvm-svn: 328554
Summary:
llvm-objdump now disassembles unrecognised opcodes as data, using
the .long directive. We treat unrecognised opcodes as being 32 bit
values, so move along 4 bytes rather than the single byte which
previously resulted in a cascade of bogus disassembly following an
unrecognised opcode.
While no solution can always disassemble code that contains
embedded data correctly this provides a significant improvement.
The disassembler will now cope with an arbitrary length section
as it no longer truncates it to a multiple of 4 bytes, and will
use the .byte directive for trailing bytes.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44685
llvm-svn: 328553
The pipeliner must add a loop carried dependence between two memory
operations if the base register is not an affine (linear) exression.
The current implementation doesn't check how the base register is
defined, which allows non-affine expressions, and then the pipeliner
does not add a loop carried dependence when one is needed.
This patch adds code to isLoopCarriedOrder that checks if the base
register of the memory operations is defined by a phi, and the loop
definition for the phi is a constant increment value. This is a very
simple check for a linear expression.
Patch by Brendon Cahoon.
llvm-svn: 328550
The pipeliner is not adding a dependence edge for a loop carried
dependence, and ends up scheduling a load from iteration n prior
to an aliased store in iteration n-1.
The code that adds the loop carried dependences in the pipeliner
doesn't check if the memory objects for loads and stores are
"identified" (i.e., distinct) objects. If they are not, then the
code that adds the dependences needs to be conservative. The
objects can be used to check dependences only when they are
distinct objects.
The code that checks for loop carried dependences has been updated
to classify loads and stores that are not identified as "unknown"
values. A store with an "unknown" value can potentially create
a loop carried dependence with any pending load.
Patch by Brendon Cahoon.
llvm-svn: 328547
The phi renaming code in the pipeliner uses the wrong value when
rewriting phi uses, which results in an undefined value. In this
case, the original phi is no longer needed due to the order of
instruction in the pipelined loop. The pipeliner was assuming, in
this case, the the phi loop definition should be used to
rewrite the uses. However, the pipeliner needs to check to make
sure that the loop definition has already been scheduled. If not,
then the phi initial value needs to be used instead.
Patch by Brendon Cahoon.
llvm-svn: 328545
The pipeliner was generating too many phis in the epilog blocks, which
caused incorrect code generation when rewriting an instruction that uses
the phi.
In this case, there 3 prolog and epilog stages. An existing phi was
scheduled at stage 1. When generating the code for the 2nd epilog an
extra new phi was generated.
To fix this, we need to update the code that calculates the maximum
number of phis that can be generated, which is based upon the current
prolog stage and the stage of the original phi. In this case, when the
prolog stage is 1 and the original phi stage is 1, the maximum number
of phis to generate is 2.
Patch by Brendon Cahoon.
llvm-svn: 328543
The patch contains severals changes needed to pipeline an example
that was transformed so that a Phi with a subreg is converted to
copies.
The pipeliner wasn't working for a couple of reasons.
- The RecMII was 3 instead of 2 due to the extra copies.
- Copy instructions contained a latency of 1.
- The node order algorithm was not choosing the best "bottom"
node, which caused an instruction to be scheduled that had a
predecessor and successor already scheduled.
- Updated the Hexagon Machine Scheduler to check if the node is
latency bound when adding the cost for a 0-latency dependence.
The RecMII was 3 because the computation looks at the number of
nodes in the recurrence. The extra copy is an extra node but
it shouldn't increase the latency. The new RecMII computation
looks at the latency of the instructions in the recurrence. We
changed the latency of the dependence of a copy to 0. The latency
computation for the copy also checks the use of the copy (similar
to a reg_sequence).
The node order algorithm was not choosing the last instruction
in the recurrence for a bottom up traversal. This was when the
last instruction is a copy. A check was added when choosing the
instruction to check for NodeNum if the maxASAP is the same. This
means that the scheduler will not end up with another node in
the recurrence that has both a predecessor and successor already
scheduled.
The cost computation in Hexagon Machine Scheduler adds cost when
an instruction can be packetized with a zero-latency instruction.
We should only do this if the schedule is latency bound.
Patch by Brendon Cahoon.
llvm-svn: 328542
