The theory is it's still faster than a pair of movq / a quad of movl. This
will probably hurt older chips like P4 but should run faster on current
and future Intel processors. rdar://8817010
llvm-svn: 122955
the same as setcc. Optimize ADDC(0,0,FLAGS) -> SET_CARRY(FLAGS). This is
a step towards finishing off PR5443. In the testcase in that bug we now get:
movq %rdi, %rax
addq %rsi, %rax
sbbq %rcx, %rcx
testb $1, %cl
setne %dl
ret
instead of:
movq %rdi, %rax
addq %rsi, %rax
movl $0, %ecx
adcq $0, %rcx
testq %rcx, %rcx
setne %dl
ret
llvm-svn: 122219
their carry depenedencies with MVT::Flag operands) and use clean and beautiful
EFLAGS dependences instead.
We do this by changing the modelling of SBB/ADC to have EFLAGS input and outputs
(which is what requires the previous scheduler change) and change X86 ISelLowering
to custom lower ADDC and friends down to X86ISD::ADD/ADC/SUB/SBB nodes.
With the previous series of changes, this causes no changes in the testsuite, woo.
llvm-svn: 122213
the output to the correct register. Fixes a hidden problem uncovered
by the last patch where we'd try to DAG combine our MVT::Other node
oddly.
llvm-svn: 121358
result. This allows us to compile:
void *test12(long count) {
return new int[count];
}
into:
test12:
movl $4, %ecx
movq %rdi, %rax
mulq %rcx
movq $-1, %rdi
cmovnoq %rax, %rdi
jmp __Znam ## TAILCALL
instead of:
test12:
movl $4, %ecx
movq %rdi, %rax
mulq %rcx
seto %cl
testb %cl, %cl
movq $-1, %rdi
cmoveq %rax, %rdi
jmp __Znam
Of course it would be even better if the regalloc inverted the cmov to 'cmovoq',
which would eliminate the need for the 'movq %rdi, %rax'.
llvm-svn: 120936
backend that they were all implemented except umul. This one fell back
to the default implementation that did a hi/lo multiply and compared the
top. Fix this to check the overflow flag that the 'mul' instruction
sets, so we can avoid an explicit test. Now we compile:
void *func(long count) {
return new int[count];
}
into:
__Z4funcl: ## @_Z4funcl
movl $4, %ecx ## encoding: [0xb9,0x04,0x00,0x00,0x00]
movq %rdi, %rax ## encoding: [0x48,0x89,0xf8]
mulq %rcx ## encoding: [0x48,0xf7,0xe1]
seto %cl ## encoding: [0x0f,0x90,0xc1]
testb %cl, %cl ## encoding: [0x84,0xc9]
movq $-1, %rdi ## encoding: [0x48,0xc7,0xc7,0xff,0xff,0xff,0xff]
cmoveq %rax, %rdi ## encoding: [0x48,0x0f,0x44,0xf8]
jmp __Znam ## TAILCALL
instead of:
__Z4funcl: ## @_Z4funcl
movl $4, %ecx ## encoding: [0xb9,0x04,0x00,0x00,0x00]
movq %rdi, %rax ## encoding: [0x48,0x89,0xf8]
mulq %rcx ## encoding: [0x48,0xf7,0xe1]
testq %rdx, %rdx ## encoding: [0x48,0x85,0xd2]
movq $-1, %rdi ## encoding: [0x48,0xc7,0xc7,0xff,0xff,0xff,0xff]
cmoveq %rax, %rdi ## encoding: [0x48,0x0f,0x44,0xf8]
jmp __Znam ## TAILCALL
Other than the silly seto+test, this is using the o bit directly, so it's going in the right
direction.
llvm-svn: 120935
The user (i.e. whoever generated a call to the intrinsic in the first place) is
essentially asking for a particular instruction to be placed in the assembler.
If that instruction won't execute on the target machine, that's their problem
not ours. Two buildbots with processors that don't support SSE3 were barfing
on the apm.ll test in CodeGen/X86 because of this assertion.
llvm-svn: 120574
legalization time. Since at legalization time there is no mapping from
SDNode back to the corresponding LLVM instruction and the return
SDNode is target specific, this requires a target hook to check for
eligibility. Only x86 and ARM support this form of sibcall optimization
right now.
rdar://8707777
llvm-svn: 120501
nodes to indicate when ha16/lo16 modifiers should be used. This lets
us pass PowerPC/indirectbr.ll.
The one annoying thing about this patch is that the MCSymbolExpr isn't
expressive enough to represent ha16(label1-label2) which we need on
PowerPC. I have a terrible hack in the meantime, but this will have
to be revisited at some point.
Last major conversion item left is global variable references.
llvm-svn: 119105
