The patch extends size reduction pass for MicroMIPS. Two MOVE
instructions are transformed into one MOVEP instrucition.
Patch by Milena Vujosevic Janicic.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52037
llvm-svn: 342572
The patch fixes definition of MOVEP instruction. Two registers are used
instead of register pairs. This is necessary as machine verifier cannot
handle register pairs.
Patch by Milena Vujosevic Janicic.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52035
llvm-svn: 342571
Summary: This patch just surfaces the object linking layer from the LLJIT classes so that clients can take advantage of the changes implemented in r341154.
Reviewers: lhames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51551
llvm-svn: 342567
This patch adds an initial x86 SimplifyDemandedVectorEltsForTargetNode implementation to handle target shuffles.
Currently the patch only decodes a target shuffle, calls SimplifyDemandedVectorElts on its input operands and removes any shuffle that reduces to undef/zero/identity.
Future work will need to integrate this with combineX86ShufflesRecursively, add support for other x86 ops, etc.
NOTE: There is a minor regression that appears to be affecting further (extractelement?) combines which I haven't been able to solve yet - possibly something to do with how nodes are added to the worklist after simplification.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52140
llvm-svn: 342564
The reason why build #25777 might have failed is because the SmallVector move
constructor is _not_ noexcept, and the stl implementation used by that buildbot
calls _VSTD::move_if_noexcept() (according to the backtrace).
OpcodeInfo has a default move constructor, and the copy constructor is deleted.
However, as far as I can see, SmallVector doesn't declare a noexcept move
constructor. So, what I believe it is happening here is that,
_VSTD::move_if_noexcept() returns an lvalue reference and not an rvalue
reference.
This eventually triggers a copy that fails to compile.
Hopefully, using a std::vector instead of SmallVector (as it was originally
suggested by Simon in the code review) should be enough to unbreak the buildbot.
llvm-svn: 342561
Summary:
This is required for GPUs with 16 bit instructions where f16 is a
legal register type and hence int_to_fp i1 to f16 is not lowered
by legalizing.
Reviewers: arsenm, nhaehnle
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52018
Change-Id: Ie4c0fd6ced7cf10ad612023c6879724d9ded5851
llvm-svn: 342558
Clang-compiled object files currently don't include the symbol sizes and
types. Some tools however need that information. For example, ctfconvert
uses that information to generate FreeBSD's CTF representation from ELF
files.
With this patch, symbol sizes and types are included in object files.
Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@orange.com>
Reported-by: Yutaro Hayakawa <yhayakawa3720@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 342556
This patch adds the ability for processor models to describe dependency breaking
instructions.
Different processors may specify a different set of dependency-breaking
instructions.
That means, we cannot assume that all processors of the same target would use
the same rules to classify dependency breaking instructions.
The main goal of this patch is to provide the means to describe dependency
breaking instructions directly via tablegen, and have the following
TargetSubtargetInfo hooks redefined in overrides by tabegen'd
XXXGenSubtargetInfo classes (here, XXX is a Target name).
```
virtual bool isZeroIdiom(const MachineInstr *MI, APInt &Mask) const {
return false;
}
virtual bool isDependencyBreaking(const MachineInstr *MI, APInt &Mask) const {
return isZeroIdiom(MI);
}
```
An instruction MI is a dependency-breaking instruction if a call to method
isDependencyBreaking(MI) on the STI (TargetSubtargetInfo object) evaluates to
true. Similarly, an instruction MI is a special case of zero-idiom dependency
breaking instruction if a call to STI.isZeroIdiom(MI) returns true.
The extra APInt is used for those targets that may want to select which machine
operands have their dependency broken (see comments in code).
Note that by default, subtargets don't know about the existence of
dependency-breaking. In the absence of external information, those method calls
would always return false.
A new tablegen class named STIPredicate has been added by this patch to let
processor models classify instructions that have properties in common. The idea
is that, a MCInstrPredicate definition can be used to "generate" an instruction
equivalence class, with the idea that instructions of a same class all have a
property in common.
STIPredicate definitions are essentially a collection of instruction equivalence
classes.
Also, different processor models can specify a different variant of the same
STIPredicate with different rules (i.e. predicates) to classify instructions.
Tablegen backends (in this particular case, the SubtargetEmitter) will be able
to process STIPredicate definitions, and automatically generate functions in
XXXGenSubtargetInfo.
This patch introduces two special kind of STIPredicate classes named
IsZeroIdiomFunction and IsDepBreakingFunction in tablegen. It also adds a
definition for those in the BtVer2 scheduling model only.
This patch supersedes the one committed at r338372 (phabricator review: D49310).
The main advantages are:
- We can describe subtarget predicates via tablegen using STIPredicates.
- We can describe zero-idioms / dep-breaking instructions directly via
tablegen in the scheduling models.
In future, the STIPredicates framework can be used for solving other problems.
Examples of future developments are:
- Teach how to identify optimizable register-register moves
- Teach how to identify slow LEA instructions (each subtarget defining its own
concept of "slow" LEA).
- Teach how to identify instructions that have undocumented false dependencies
on the output registers on some processors only.
It is also (in my opinion) an elegant way to expose knowledge to both external
tools like llvm-mca, and codegen passes.
For example, machine schedulers in LLVM could reuse that information when
internally constructing the data dependency graph for a code region.
This new design feature is also an "opt-in" feature. Processor models don't have
to use the new STIPredicates. It has all been designed to be as unintrusive as
possible.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52174
llvm-svn: 342555
This is an alternative to D37896. I don't see a way to decompose multiplies
generically without a target hook to tell us when it's profitable.
ARM and AArch64 may be able to remove some duplicate code that overlaps with
this transform.
As a first step, we're only getting the most clear wins on the vector examples
requested in PR34474:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34474
As noted in the code comment, it's likely that the x86 constraints are tighter
than necessary, but it may not always be a win to replace a pmullw/pmulld.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52195
llvm-svn: 342554
This involves changing the shouldExpandAtomicCmpXchgInIR interface, but I have
updated the in-tree backends using this hook (ARM, AArch64, Hexagon) so they
will see no functional change. Previously this hook returned bool, but it now
returns AtomicExpansionKind.
This hook allows targets to select how a given cmpxchg is to be expanded.
D48131 uses this to expand part-word cmpxchg to a target-specific intrinsic.
See my associated RFC for more info on the motivation for this change
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-June/123993.html>.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48130
llvm-svn: 342550
This fixes building for Windows on ARM, with MinGW headers.
(Building for Windows on ARM with Windows SDK still is unsupported
by the benchmark library.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52262
llvm-svn: 342549
Summary:
Same as to D52146.
`((1 << y)+(-1))` is simply non-canoniacal version of `~(-1 << y)`: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/0vl
We can not canonicalize it due to the extra uses. But we can handle it here.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52147
llvm-svn: 342547
Summary:
Two folds are happening here:
1. https://rise4fun.com/Alive/oaFX
2. And then `foldICmpWithHighBitMask()` (D52001): https://rise4fun.com/Alive/wsP4
This change doesn't just add the handling for eq/ne predicates,
it actually builds upon the previous `foldICmpWithLowBitMaskedVal()` work,
so **all** the 16 fold variants* are immediately supported.
I'm indeed only testing these two predicates.
I do not feel like re-proving all 16 folds*, because they were already proven
for the general case of constant with all-ones in low bits. So as long as
the mask produces all-ones in low bits, i'm pretty sure the fold is valid.
But required, i can re-prove, let me know.
* eq/ne are commutative - 4 folds; ult/ule/ugt/uge - are not commutative (the commuted variant is InstSimplified), 4 folds; slt/sle/sgt/sge are not commutative - 4 folds. 12 folds in total.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38123https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38708
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52146
llvm-svn: 342546
Fixes the unwind information generated for floating-point registers.
Previously, all padding registers were assumed to be four bytes wide. Now, the
width of the register is used to specify the amount of padding.
Patch by Jackson Woodruff!
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51494
llvm-svn: 342545
Summary:
Pass Execution Instrumentation interface enables customizable instrumentation
of pass execution, as per "RFC: Pass Execution Instrumentation interface"
posted 06/07/2018 on llvm-dev@
The intent is to provide a common machinery to implement all
the pass-execution-debugging features like print-before/after,
opt-bisect, time-passes etc.
Here we get a basic implementation consisting of:
* PassInstrumentationCallbacks class that handles registration of callbacks
and access to them.
* PassInstrumentation class that handles instrumentation-point interfaces
that call into PassInstrumentationCallbacks.
* Callbacks accept StringRef which is just a name of the Pass right now.
There were some ideas to pass an opaque wrapper for the pointer to pass instance,
however it appears that pointer does not actually identify the instance
(adaptors and managers might have the same address with the pass they govern).
Hence it was decided to go simple for now and then later decide on what the proper
mental model of identifying a "pass in a phase of pipeline" is.
* Callbacks accept llvm::Any serving as a wrapper for const IRUnit*, to remove direct dependencies
on different IRUnits (e.g. Analyses).
* PassInstrumentationAnalysis analysis is explicitly requested from PassManager through
usual AnalysisManager::getResult. All pass managers were updated to run that
to get PassInstrumentation object for instrumentation calls.
* Using tuples/index_sequence getAnalysisResult helper to extract generic AnalysisManager's extra
args out of a generic PassManager's extra args. This is the only way I was able to explicitly
run getResult for PassInstrumentationAnalysis out of a generic code like PassManager::run or
RepeatedPass::run.
TODO: Upon lengthy discussions we agreed to accept this as an initial implementation
and then get rid of getAnalysisResult by improving RepeatedPass implementation.
* PassBuilder takes PassInstrumentationCallbacks object to pass it further into
PassInstrumentationAnalysis. Callbacks registration should be performed directly
through PassInstrumentationCallbacks.
* new-pm tests updated to account for PassInstrumentationAnalysis being run
* Added PassInstrumentation tests to PassBuilderCallbacks unit tests.
Other unit tests updated with registration of the now-required PassInstrumentationAnalysis.
Reviewers: chandlerc, philip.pfaffe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47858
llvm-svn: 342544
This is still unsafe for long double, we will transform things into tanl
even if tanl is for another type. But that's for someone else to fix.
llvm-svn: 342542
Add a higher performance alternative to calling resize() every time which performs a lot of clearing to zero - when we're adding a single bit most of the time this will be completely unnecessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52236
llvm-svn: 342535
Introduce a new RISCVExpandPseudoInsts pass to expand atomic
pseudo-instructions after register allocation. This is necessary in order to
ensure that register spills aren't introduced between LL and SC, thus breaking
the forward progress guarantee for the operation. AArch64 does something
similar for CmpXchg (though only at O0), and Mips is moving towards this
approach (see D31287). See also [this mailing list
post](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-May/099490.html) from
James Knight, which summarises the issues with lowering to ll/sc in IR or
pre-RA.
See the [accompanying RFC
thread](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-June/123993.html) for an
overview of the lowering strategy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47882
llvm-svn: 342534
The 0x800 bit in @feat.00 needs to be set in order to make LLD pick up
the .gfid$y table. I believe this is fine to set even if we don't emit
the instrumentation.
We haven't emitted @feat.00 on 64-bit before. I see that MSVC does emit
it, but I'm not entirely sure what the default value should be. I went
with zero since that seems as safe as not emitting the symbol in the
first place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52235
llvm-svn: 342532
SimplifyDemandedVectorEltsForTargetNode will remove most of this test unless get rid of the undefs - still testing for align 1 which was the point of the test
Removed out of date comment as well
llvm-svn: 342531
When SimplifyCFG changes the PHI node into a select instruction, the debug information becomes ambiguous. It causes the debugger to display wrong variable value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51976
llvm-svn: 342527
It's pretty common for the verifier to dump the relevant DIE when it
finds an issue. This tends to be relatively verbose and error prone
because we have to pass the DIDumpOptions to the DIE's dump method. This
patch adds a helper function to the verifier to make this easier.
llvm-svn: 342526
- Instead of having both `SUnit::dump(ScheduleDAG*)` and
`ScheduleDAG::dumpNode(ScheduleDAG*)`, just keep the latter around.
- Add `ScheduleDAG::dump()` and avoid code duplication in several
places. Implement it for different ScheduleDAG variants.
- Add `ScheduleDAG::dumpNodeName()` in favor of the `SUnit::print()`
functions. They were only ever used for debug dumping and putting the
function into ScheduleDAG is consistent with the `dumpNode()` change.
llvm-svn: 342520
Summary:
This change introduces an `FDRLogWriter` type which is responsible for
serialising metadata and function records to character buffers. This is
the first step in a refactoring of the implementation of the FDR runtime
to allow for more granular testing of the individual components of the
implementation.
The main contribution of this change is a means of hiding the details of
how specific records are written to a buffer, and for managing the
extents of these buffers. We make use of C++ features (templates and
some metaprogramming) to reduce repetition in the act of writing out
specific kinds of records to the buffer.
In this process, we make a number of changes across both LLVM and
compiler-rt to allow us to use the `Trace` abstraction defined in the
LLVM project in the testing of the runtime implementation. This gives us
a closer end-to-end test which version-locks the runtime implementation
with the loading implementation in LLVM.
We also allow using gmock in compiler-rt unit tests, by adding the
requisite definitions in the `AddCompilerRT.cmake` module.
Finally, we've gone ahead and updated the FDR logging implementation to
use the FDRLogWriter for the lowest-level record-writing details.
Following patches will isolate the state machine transitions which
manage the set-up and tear-down of the buffers we're using in multiple
threads.
Reviewers: mboerger, eizan
Subscribers: mgorny, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52220
llvm-svn: 342518
System Library has been a long deprecated term along with the path lib/System, having been superseded/renamed
to the Support Library a long time ago. These patches reflect those changes in documentation as well as
update some outdated examples and provide context to the origin of the Support Library.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52107
llvm-svn: 342500
There were several issues with the previous implementation.
1) There were no tests.
2) We didn't support creating PDBSymbolTypePointer records for
builtin types since those aren't described by LF_POINTER
records.
3) We didn't support a wide enough variety of builtin types even
ignoring pointers.
This patch fixes all of these issues. In order to add tests,
it's helpful to be able to ignore the symbol index id hierarchy
because it makes the golden output from the DIA version not match
our output, so I've extended the dumper to disable dumping of id
fields.
llvm-svn: 342493
rL342465 is breaking the MSVC buildbots, but I need to revert this dependent revision as well.
Summary:
Added function to set a register to a particular value + tests.
Add EFLAGS test, use new setRegTo instead of setRegToConstant.
Reviewers: courbet, javed.absar
Subscribers: mgorny, tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51856
llvm-svn: 342489
This allows the hard-coded shouldForceImmediate logic to be removed because
the generated MatchOperandParserImpl makes use of the current context (i.e.
the current mnemonic) to determine parsing behaviour, and so won't first try
to parse a register before parsing a symbol name.
No functional change is intended. gas accepts immediate arguments for call,
tail and lla. This patch doesn't address this discrepancy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51733
llvm-svn: 342488
