This tests the effect of both promotion and internalization on a module,
and helps show that D21883 is NFC wrt promotion+internalization.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21915
llvm-svn: 274699
By replacing dyn_cast of ConstantInt with m_Zero/m_One/m_AllOnes, we
allow these transforms for splat vectors.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21899
llvm-svn: 274696
xorl + setcc is generally the preferred sequence due to the partial register
stall setcc + movzbl suffers from. As a bonus, it also encodes one byte smaller.
This fixes PR28146.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21774
llvm-svn: 274692
On CPUs with the zero cycle zeroing feature enabled "movi v.2d" should
be used to zero a vector register. This was previously done at
instruction selection time, however the register coalescer sometimes
widened multiple vregs to the Q width because of that leading to extra
spills. This patch leaves the decision on how to zero a register to the
AsmPrinter phase where it doesn't affect register allocation anymore.
This patch also sets isAsCheapAsAMove=1 on FMOVS0, FMOVD0.
This fixes http://llvm.org/PR27454, rdar://25866262
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21826
llvm-svn: 274686
findScratchNonCalleeSaveRegister() just needs a simple liveness
analysis, use LivePhysRegs for that as it is simpler and does not depend
on the kill flags.
This commit adds a convenience function available() to LivePhysRegs:
This function returns true if the given register is not reserved and
neither the register nor any of its aliases are alive.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21865
llvm-svn: 274685
Follow-up from r274465: we don't need to capture the value in these cases,
so just match the constant that we're looking for. m_One/m_Zero work with
vector splats as well as scalars.
llvm-svn: 274670
Added metadata to be able to make statistics on how many functions
that have been imported have been removed. Also module name might
be helpfull when debugging.
Reviewers: tejohnson, eraman
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21943
llvm-svn: 274668
Summary:
Fixes an incorrect assert that fails on 128-bit-sized loads or stores.
Augments the wset tests to include this case.
Reviewers: aizatsky
Subscribers: vitalybuka, zhaoqin, kcc, eugenis, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22062
llvm-svn: 274666
Now with a corrected test to account for a recently supported properties bit in the debug info of a struct.
Original review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21939
This reverts commit 970c3fd497a28d25dd69526eb52594a696c37968.
llvm-svn: 274661
The dse_with_dbg_value.ll test committed with r273141 is removed because this
we no longer performs any type of back tracking, which is what was causing the
codegen differences with and without debug information.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21613
llvm-svn: 274660
Text suggested by Daniel Berlin. While it is likely to be exactly what
the advisory committee would do anyway, codifying it does no harm and
helps reassure people that rare does not mean arbitrary.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21981
llvm-svn: 274659
This is "cvtdq2ps" which does not appear to be particularly slow on any CPU
according to Agner's tables. Choosing "5" as a cost here as suggested in:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21356
...but it seems very conservative given that the instruction is fully pipelined,
and I think these costs are supposed to model throughput.
Note that related costs are also most likely too high, but this fixes PR21356
and partly fixes PR28434.
llvm-svn: 274658
We were still crashing in the "no change" case because LVI was not
getting invalidated.
See the thread "Should analyses be able to hold AssertingVH to IR?
(related to PR28400)" for more discussion.
llvm-svn: 274656
This logic was introduced in r157663 and does not make any sense to me.
The motivating example in rdar://11538365 looks like this:
This is the tail:
BB#16: derived from LLVM BB %if.end68
Live Ins: %R0 %R4 %R5
Predecessors according to CFG: BB#15 BB#5
tBLXi pred:14, pred:%noreg, <ga:@CFRelease>, %R0<kill>, <regmask>, %LR<imp-def,dead>, %SP<imp-use>, %SP<imp-def>
t2B <BB#20>, pred:14, pred:%noreg
Successors according to CFG: BB#20
This is the predBB:
BB#5:
Live Ins: %R5
Predecessors according to CFG: BB#4
%R4<def> = t2MOVi 0, pred:14, pred:%noreg, opt:%noreg
t2B <BB#16>, pred:14, pred:%noreg
Successors according to CFG: BB#16
However this is invalid machine code to begin with, if %R0 is live-in to
BB#16 then it must be live-in to BB#5 as well if BB#5 does not define
it. We should not need logic to retroactively fix broken machine code
and in fact the example from r157663 passes cleanly with the code
removed and I do not see any (newly) failing tests with the machine
verifier enabled.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22031
llvm-svn: 274655
Cast cost tables are now sorted, for each cast type, lexicographically on
[source base type, source vector width, dest base type, base vector width].
llvm-svn: 274653
On SystemZ, shift and rotate instructions only use the bottom 6 bits of the shift/rotate amount.
Therefore, if the amount is ANDed with an immediate mask that has all of the bottom 6 bits set, we
can remove the AND operation entirely.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21854
llvm-svn: 274650
We were checking for 2 insertions (which is caught earlier in the pattern matching loop) instead of the case where we have no insertions.
Turns out this code never fires as we always try to lower to insertps after trying to lower to blendps, which would catch these cases - I'm about to make some changes to support combining to insertps which could cause this to fire so I don't want to remove it.
llvm-svn: 274648
There is a problem in VSXSwapRemoval where it is incorrectly removing permute instructions.
In this case, the permute is feeding both a vector store and also a non-store instruction. In this case, the permute cannot be removed.
The fix is to simply look at all the uses of the vector register defined by the permute and ensure that all the uses are vector store instructions.
This problem was reported in PR 27735 (https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27735).
Test case based on the original problem reported.
Phabricator Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21802
llvm-svn: 274645
Summary:
findBetterNeighborChains may or may not find a better chain for each node it finds, which include the node ("St") that visitSTORE is currently processing. If no better chain is found for St, visitSTORE should continue instead of return SDValue(St, 0), as if it's CombinedTo'ed.
This fixes bug 28130. There might be other ways to make the test pass (see D21409). I think both of the patches are fixing actual bugs revealed by the same testcase.
Reviewers: echristo, wschmidt, hfinkel, kbarton, amehsan, arsenm, nemanjai, bogner
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, nemanjai, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21692
llvm-svn: 274644
The cost model should not assume vector casts get completely scalarized, since
on targets that have vector support, the common case is a partial split up to
the legal vector size. So, when a vector cast gets split, the resulting casts
end up legal and cheap.
Instead of pessimistically assuming scalarization, base TTI can use the costs
the concrete TTI provides for the split vector, plus a fudge factor to account
for the cost of the split itself. This fudge factor is currently 1 by default,
except on AMDGPU where inserts and extracts are considered free.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21251
llvm-svn: 274642
