There's no need to do this if the user doesn't call va_start. In the
future, we're going to have thunks that forward these register
parameters with musttail calls, and they won't need these spills for
handling va_start.
Most of the test suite changes are adding va_start calls to existing
tests to keep things working.
llvm-svn: 216294
insertions.
The old behavior could cause arbitrarily bad memory usage in the DAG
combiner if there was heavy traffic of adding nodes already on the
worklist to it. This commit switches the DAG combine worklist to work
the same way as the instcombine worklist where we null-out removed
entries and only add new entries to the worklist. My measurements of
codegen time shows slight improvement. The memory utilization is
unsurprisingly dominated by other factors (the IR and DAG itself
I suspect).
This change results in subtle, frustrating churn in the particular order
in which DAG combines are applied which causes a number of minor
regressions where we fail to match a pattern previously matched by
accident. AFAICT, all of these should be using AddToWorklist to directly
or should be written in a less brittle way. None of the changes seem
drastically bad, and a few of the changes seem distinctly better.
A major change required to make this work is to significantly harden the
way in which the DAG combiner handle nodes which become dead
(zero-uses). Previously, we relied on the ability to "priority-bump"
them on the combine worklist to achieve recursive deletion of these
nodes and ensure that the frontier of remaining live nodes all were
added to the worklist. Instead, I've introduced a routine to just
implement that precise logic with no indirection. It is a significantly
simpler operation than that of the combiner worklist proper. I suspect
this will also fix some other problems with the combiner.
I think the x86 changes are really minor and uninteresting, but the
avx512 change at least is hiding a "regression" (despite the test case
being just noise, not testing some performance invariant) that might be
looked into. Not sure if any of the others impact specific "important"
code paths, but they didn't look terribly interesting to me, or the
changes were really minor. The consensus in review is to fix any
regressions that show up after the fact here.
Thanks to the other reviewers for checking the output on other
architectures. There is a specific regression on ARM that Tim already
has a fix prepped to commit.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4616
llvm-svn: 213727
Darwin prologues save their GPRs in two stages: a narrow push of r0-r7 & lr,
followed by a wide push of the remaining registers if there are any. AAPCS uses
a single push.w instruction.
It turns out that, on average, enough registers get pushed that code is smaller
in the AAPCS prologue, which is a nice property for M-class programmers. They
also have other options available for back-traces, so can hopefully deal with
the fact that FP & LR aren't adjacent in memory.
rdar://problem/15909583
llvm-svn: 209895
Sicne MBB->computeRegisterLivenes() returns Dead for sub regs like s0,
d0 is used in vpop instead of updating sp, which causes s0 dead before
its use.
This patch checks the liveness of each subreg to make sure the reg is
actually dead.
llvm-svn: 204411
The changes caused by folding an sp-adjustment into a "pop" previously
disrupted the forward search for the final real instruction in a
terminating block. This switches to a backward search (skipping debug
instrs).
This fixes PR18399.
Patch by Zhaoshi.
llvm-svn: 199266
The ARM backend has been using most of the MachO related subtarget
checks almost interchangeably, and since the only target it's had to
run on has been IOS (which is all three of MachO, Darwin and IOS) it's
worked out OK so far.
But we'd like to support embedded targets under the "*-*-none-macho"
triple, which means everything starts falling apart and inconsistent
behaviours emerge.
This patch should pick a reasonably sensible set of behaviours for the
new triple (and any others that come along, with luck). Some choices
were debatable (notably FP == r7 or r11), but we can revisit those
later when deficiencies become apparent.
llvm-svn: 198617
When trying to eliminate an "sub sp, sp, #N" instruction by folding
it into an existing push/pop using dummy registers, we need to account
for the fact that this might affect precisely how "fp" gets set in the
prologue.
We were attempting this, but assuming that *whenever* we performed a
fold it would make a difference. This is false, for example, in:
push {r4, r7, lr}
add fp, sp, #4
vpush {d8}
sub sp, sp, #8
we can fold the "sub" into the "vpush", forming "vpush {d7, d8}".
However, in that case the "add fp" instruction mustn't change, which
we were getting wrong before.
Should fix PR18160.
llvm-svn: 196725
We were trying to fold the stack adjustment into the wrong instruction in the
situation where the entire basic-block was epilogue code. Really, it can only
ever be valid to do the folding precisely where the "add sp, ..." would be
placed so there's no need for a separate iterator to track that.
Should fix PR18136.
llvm-svn: 196493
Previously, we clobbered callee-saved registers when folding an "add
sp, #N" into a "pop {rD, ...}" instruction. This change checks whether
a register we're going to add to the "pop" could actually be live
outside the function before doing so and should fix the issue.
This should fix PR18081.
llvm-svn: 196046
ARM prologues usually look like:
push {r7, lr}
sub sp, sp, #4
If code size is extremely important, this can be optimised to the single
instruction:
push {r6, r7, lr}
where we don't actually care about the contents of r6, but pushing it subtracts
4 from sp as a side effect.
This should implement such a conversion, predicated on the "minsize" function
attribute (-Oz) since I've yet to find any code it actually makes faster.
llvm-svn: 194264
