This patch removes hidden codegen flag -print-schedule effectively reverting the
logic originally committed as r300311
(https://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=300311).
Flag -print-schedule was originally introduced by r300311 to address PR32216
(https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32216). That bug was about adding "Better
testing of schedule model instruction latencies/throughputs".
These days, we can use llvm-mca to test scheduling models. So there is no longer
a need for flag -print-schedule in LLVM. The main use case for PR32216 is
now addressed by llvm-mca.
Flag -print-schedule is mainly used for debugging purposes, and it is only
actually used by x86 specific tests. We already have extensive (latency and
throughput) tests under "test/tools/llvm-mca" for X86 processor models. That
means, most (if not all) existing -print-schedule tests for X86 are redundant.
When flag -print-schedule was first added to LLVM, several files had to be
modified; a few APIs gained new arguments (see for example method
MCAsmStreamer::EmitInstruction), and MCSubtargetInfo/TargetSubtargetInfo gained
a couple of getSchedInfoStr() methods.
Method getSchedInfoStr() had to originally work for both MCInst and
MachineInstr. The original implmentation of getSchedInfoStr() introduced a
subtle layering violation (reported as PR37160 and then fixed/worked-around by
r330615).
In retrospect, that new API could have been designed more optimally. We can
always query MCSchedModel to get the latency and throughput. More importantly,
the "sched-info" string should not have been generated by the subtarget.
Note, r317782 fixed an issue where "print-schedule" didn't work very well in the
presence of inline assembly. That commit is also reverted by this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57244
llvm-svn: 353043
Summary:
... from 8.
`VALIGNDZ128rmbik XMM0 XMM0 K1 XMM3 RDI i_0x1 i_0x0 i_0x1` instruction already has 9 components.
It does not matter much in terms of performance, but avoiding allocation seems to come with low cost here..
Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57654
llvm-svn: 353022
Summary:
Up until the point i have looked in the source, i didn't even understood that
i can disable 'cluster' output. I have always silenced it via ` &> /dev/null`.
(And hoped it wasn't contributing much of the run time.)
While i expect that it has it's use-cases i never once needed it so far.
If i forget to silence it, console is completely flooded with that output.
How about not expecting users to opt-out of analyses,
but to explicitly specify the analyses that should be performed?
Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: tschuett, RKSimon, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57648
llvm-svn: 353021
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
SetVector uses both DenseSet and vector, which is time/memory inefficient. The points are represented as natural numbers so we can replace the DenseSet part by indexing into a vector<char> instead.
Don't cargo cult the pseudocode on the wikipedia DBSCAN page. This is a standard BFS style algorithm (the similar loops have been used several times in other LLVM components): every point is processed at most once, thus the queue has at most NumPoints elements. We represent it with a vector and allocate it outside of the loop to avoid allocation in the loop body.
We check `Processed[P]` to avoid enqueueing a point more than once, which also nicely saves us a `ClusterIdForPoint_[Q].isUndef()` check.
Many people hate the oneshot abstraction but some favor it, therefore we make a compromise, use a lambda to abstract away the neighbor adding process.
Delete the comment `assert(Neighbors.capacity() == (Points_.size() - 1));` as it is wrong.
llvm-svn: 350035
Summary:
Use `vector<char> Added + vector<size_t> ToProcess` to replace `SetVector ToProcess`
We also check `Added[P]` to enqueueing a point more than once, which
also saves us a `ClusterIdForPoint_[Q].isUndef()` check.
Reviewers: courbet, RKSimon, gchatelet, john.brawn, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54442
........
Patch wasn't approved and breaks buildbots
llvm-svn: 349139
Summary:
Use `vector<char> Added + vector<size_t> ToProcess` to replace `SetVector ToProcess`
We also check `Added[P]` to enqueueing a point more than once, which
also saves us a `ClusterIdForPoint_[Q].isUndef()` check.
Reviewers: courbet, RKSimon, gchatelet, john.brawn, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54442
llvm-svn: 349136
Apply review comments of https://reviews.llvm.org/D54185 to other target as well, specifically:
1. make anonymous namespaces as small as possible, avoid using static inside anonymous namespaces
2. Add missing header to some files
3. GetLoadImmediateOpcodem-> getLoadImmediateOpcode
4. Fix typo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54343
llvm-svn: 347309
Summary:
As it was pointed out in D54388+D54390, the maximal size of `Neighbors` is known,
it will contain at most Points_.size() minus one (the center of the cluster)
While that is the upper bound, meaning in the most cases, the actual count
will be much smaller, since D54390 made the allocation persistent,
we no longer have to worry about overly-optimistically `reserve()`ing.
Old: (D54393)
```
Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=100000 -benchmarks-file=/tmp/benchmarks.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters.html' (16 runs):
6553.167456 task-clock (msec) # 1.000 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.21% )
...
6.5547 +- 0.0134 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.20% )
```
New:
```
Performance counter stats for './bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=100000 -benchmarks-file=/tmp/benchmarks.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters.html' (16 runs):
6315.057872 task-clock (msec) # 0.999 CPUs utilized ( +- 0.24% )
...
6.3187 +- 0.0160 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.25% )
```
And that is another -~4%.
Since this is the last (as of this moment) patch in this patch series,
it is a good time to summarize:
Old: (svn trunk, as stated in D54381)
```
$ time ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=100000 -benchmarks-file=/tmp/benchmarks.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters.html &> /dev/null
real 0m24.884s
user 0m24.099s
sys 0m0.785s
```
So these patches, on a given benchmark,
has decreased llvm-exegesis analysis time by 74.62%.
There surely is more room for further improvements.
D54514 may improve thins by -11.5% more (relative to this patch).
Parallelization may improve things further significantly, too.
Reviewers: courbet, MaskRay, RKSimon, gchatelet, john.brawn
Reviewed By: courbet, MaskRay
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54415
llvm-svn: 347204
Summary:
Test data: 500kLOC of benchmark.yaml, 23Mb. (that is a subset of the actual uops benchmark i was trying to analyze!)
Old time: (D54381)
```
$ time ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=100000 -benchmarks-file=/tmp/benchmarks.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters.html &> /dev/null
real 0m10.487s
user 0m9.745s
sys 0m0.740s
```
New time:
```
$ time ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=100000 -benchmarks-file=/tmp/benchmarks.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters.html &> /dev/null
real 0m9.599s
user 0m8.824s
sys 0m0.772s
```
Not that much, around -9%. But that is not the good part yet, again.
Old:
* calls to allocation functions: 3347676
* temporary allocations: 277818
* bytes allocated in total (ignoring deallocations): 10.52 GB
New:
* calls to allocation functions: 2109712 (-36%)
* temporary allocations: 33112 (-88%)
* bytes allocated in total (ignoring deallocations): 4.43 GB (-58% *sic*)
Reviewers: courbet, MaskRay, RKSimon, gchatelet, john.brawn
Reviewed By: courbet, MaskRay
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54382
llvm-svn: 347198
Summary:
Test data: 500kLOC of benchmark.yaml, 23Mb. (that is a subset of the actual uops benchmark i was trying to analyze!)
Old time:
```
$ time ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=100000 -benchmarks-file=/tmp/benchmarks.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters.html &> /dev/null
real 0m24.884s
user 0m24.099s
sys 0m0.785s
```
New time:
```
$ time ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=analysis -analysis-epsilon=100000 -benchmarks-file=/tmp/benchmarks.yaml -analysis-inconsistencies-output-file=/tmp/clusters.html &> /dev/null
real 0m10.469s
user 0m9.797s
sys 0m0.672s
```
So -60%. And that isn't the good bit yet.
Old:
* calls to allocation functions: 106560180 (yes, 107 *million* allocations.)
* bytes allocated in total (ignoring deallocations): 12.17 GB
New:
* calls to allocation functions: 3347676 (-96.86%) (just 3 mil)
* bytes allocated in total (ignoring deallocations): 10.52 GB (~2GB less)
---
Two points i want to raise:
* `std::unordered_set<>` should not have been used there in the first place.
It is banned by the https://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#other-set-like-container-options
* There is no tests, so i'm not fully sure this is correct.
Since it was unordered set, i guess there are zero restrictions on the order, and anything will be ok?
* I tried other containers suggested in https://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#set-like-containers-std-set-smallset-setvector-etc,
this `llvm::SetVector<>` seems to be best here.
Reviewers: courbet, MaskRay, RKSimon, gchatelet, john.brawn
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: kristina, bobsayshilol, tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54381
llvm-svn: 347197
Summary:
This simplifies the code and moves everything to tablegen for consistency. This
also prepares the ground for adding issue counters.
Reviewers: gchatelet, john.brawn, jsji
Subscribers: nemanjai, mgorny, javed.absar, kbarton, tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54297
llvm-svn: 346489
This is patch to add PowerPC target to llvm-exegesis.
The target does just enough to be able to run llvm-exegesis in latency mode for at least some opcodes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54185
llvm-svn: 346411
Summary:
Add unit tests to check the support for each supported format to avoid
regressions such as the one in PR36906.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: tschuett, lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54144
llvm-svn: 346330
Summary: They do not lower to actual MCInsts and have no scheduling info.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: llvm-commits, tschuett
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54147
llvm-svn: 346227
MachineModuleInfo can only be used in code using lib/CodeGen, hence we
can keep a more specific reference to LLVMTargetMachine rather than just
TargetMachine around.
llvm-svn: 346182
Summary: SNB is the only one that has P23 as a single proc res.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53766
llvm-svn: 345480
Summary:
The pfm counters are now in the ExegesisTarget rather than the
MCSchedModel (PR39165).
This also compresses the pfm counter tables (PR37068).
Reviewers: RKSimon, gchatelet
Subscribers: mgrang, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52932
llvm-svn: 345243
Summary:
This allows simplifying references of llvm::foo with foo when the needs
come in the future.
Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet
Reviewed By: gchatelet
Subscribers: javed.absar, tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53455
llvm-svn: 344922
Summary:
We only support the first form because we rely on information that is
only available there.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53430
llvm-svn: 344782
Summary:
This was lost during refactoring in rL342644.
Fix and simplify simplify value size handling: always go through a 80 bit value,
because the value can be 1 byte). Add unit tests.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53423
llvm-svn: 344779
