Followup to D74085.
Replace the use of `report_fatal_error()` with returning the error to
`llvm-exegesis.cpp` and handling it there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74325
Summary:
I noticed a small regression in a toy project of mine after applying
D73835, in which instruction names weren't being set properly. In the
example test case included with this patch,
`llvm::IRBuilderBase::CreateAdd` returns an `llvm::Value *` that is then
passed as an argument to `llvm::IRBuilderBase::Insert`. The overloaded
function that is selected for that call then ignores the `Name`
parameter that is given. This patch addresses that issue.
Reviewers: nikic, Meinersbur, nhaehnle, fhahn, thakis, teemperor
Reviewed By: nikic, fhahn
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74754
Summary:
Backends should fold the subtraction into the comparison, but not all
seem to. Moreover, on targets where pointers are not integers, such as
CHERI, an integer subtraction is not appropriate. Instead we should just
compare the two pointers directly, as this should work everywhere and
potentially generate more efficient code.
Reviewers: bogner, lebedev.ri, efriedma, t.p.northover, uweigand, sunfish
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, arichardson, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, aheejin, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74454
There was a short discussion about this:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D73484#inline-676942
To summarize:
It is a bit unclear to me why the `DT_SYMENT` tag exist.
LLD has the code that does:
"addInt(DT_SYMENT, sizeof(Elf_Sym));" and I guess other linkers has the same logic.
It is unclear why it can be possible to have other values rather than values of
a size of platform symbol. Seems it is not possible, and atm for me it looks that
this tag should not be used. This patch starts reporting the warning when the
value it contains differs from a symbol size for a 32/64 bit platform for safety.
It keeps the rest of the logic we have unchanged. Before this patch we did not handle
the tag at all.
Differential review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74479
Summary:
These are in some sense the inverse of vmovl[bt]q: they take a vector
of n wide elements and truncate each to half its width. So they only
write half a vector's worth of output data, and therefore they also
take an 'inactive' parameter to provide the other half of the data in
the output vector. So vmovnb overwrites the even lanes of 'inactive'
with the narrowed values from the main input, and vmovnt overwrites
the odd lanes.
LLVM had existing codegen which generates these MVE instructions in
response to IR that takes two vectors of wide elements, or two vectors
of narrow ones. But in this case, we have one vector of each. So my
clang codegen strategy is to narrow the input vector of wide elements
by simply reinterpreting it as the output type, and then we have two
narrow vectors and can represent the operation as a vector shuffle
that interleaves lanes from both of them.
Even so, not all the cases I needed ended up being selected as a
single MVE instruction, so I've added a couple more patterns that spot
combinations of the 'MVEvmovn' and 'ARMvrev32' SDNodes which can be
generated as a VMOVN instruction with operands swapped.
This commit adds the unpredicated forms only.
Reviewers: dmgreen, miyuki, MarkMurrayARM, ostannard
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74337
Summary:
These intrinsics take a vector of 2n elements, and return a vector of
n wider elements obtained by sign- or zero-extending every other
element of the input vector. They're represented in IR as a
shufflevector that extracts the odd or even elements of the input,
followed by a sext or zext.
Existing LLVM codegen already matches this pattern and generates the
VMOVLB instruction (which widens the even-index input lanes). But no
existing isel rule was generating VMOVLT, so I've added some. However,
the new rules currently only work in little-endian MVE, because the
pattern they expect from isel lowering includes a bitconvert which
doesn't have the right semantics in big-endian.
The output of one existing codegen test is improved by those new
rules.
This commit adds the unpredicated forms only.
Reviewers: dmgreen, miyuki, MarkMurrayARM, ostannard
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74336
Summary:
When we start putting instances of `ARMVectorRegCast` in complex isel
patterns, it will be awkward that they're often turned into the more
standard `bitconvert` in little-endian mode. We'd rather not have to
write separate isel patterns for the two endiannesses, matching
different but equivalent cast operations.
This change aims to fix that awkwardness in advance, by turning the
Tablegen record `ARMVectorRegCast` from a simple `SDNode` instance
into a `PatFrags` that can match either kind of cast – with a
predicate that prevents it matching a bitconvert in the big-endian
case, where bitconvert isn't semantically identical.
No existing code generation should be affected by this change, but it
will enable the patterns introduced by D74336 to work in both
endiannesses.
Reviewers: dmgreen
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74716
Summary:
vclzq maps nicely to the existing target-independent @llvm.ctlz IR
intrinsic. But vclsq ('count leading sign bits') has no corresponding
target-independent intrinsic, so I've made up @llvm.arm.mve.vcls.
This commit adds the unpredicated forms only.
Reviewers: dmgreen, miyuki, MarkMurrayARM, ostannard
Reviewed By: miyuki
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74335
Summary:
This adds the unpredicated forms of six different MVE intrinsics which
all round a vector of floating-point numbers to integer values,
leaving them still in FP format, differing only in rounding mode and
exception settings.
Five of them map to existing target-independent intrinsics in LLVM IR,
such as @llvm.trunc and @llvm.rint. The sixth, mapping to the `vrintn`
instruction, is done by inventing a target-specific intrinsic.
(`vrintn` behaves the same as `vrintx` in terms of the output value:
the side effects on the FPSCR flags are the only difference between
the two. But ACLE specifies separate user-callable intrinsics for the
two, so the side effects matter enough to make sure we generate the
right one of the two instructions in each case.)
Reviewers: dmgreen, miyuki, MarkMurrayARM, ostannard
Reviewed By: miyuki
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74333
This patch adds a simplification if an OR weakens the overflow condition
for umul.with.overflow by treating any non-zero result as overflow. In that
case, we overflow if both umul.with.overflow operands are != 0, as in that
case the result can only be 0, iff the multiplication overflows.
Code like this is generated by code using __builtin_mul_overflow with
negative integer constants, e.g.
bool test(unsigned long long v, unsigned long long *res) {
return __builtin_mul_overflow(v, -4775807LL, res);
}
```
----------------------------------------
Name: D74141
%res = umul_overflow {i8, i1} %a, %b
%mul = extractvalue {i8, i1} %res, 0
%overflow = extractvalue {i8, i1} %res, 1
%cmp = icmp ne %mul, 0
%ret = or i1 %overflow, %cmp
ret i1 %ret
=>
%t0 = icmp ne i8 %a, 0
%t1 = icmp ne i8 %b, 0
%ret = and i1 %t0, %t1
ret i1 %ret
%res = umul_overflow {i8, i1} %a, %b
%mul = extractvalue {i8, i1} %res, 0
%cmp = icmp ne %mul, 0
%overflow = extractvalue {i8, i1} %res, 1
Done: 1
Optimization is correct!
```
Reviewers: nikic, lebedev.ri, spatel, Bigcheese, dexonsmith, aemerson
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74141
The CheckAtomic module performs two tests to determine if passing
'-latomic' to the linker is required: one for 64-bit atomics, and
another for non-64-bit atomics. Include the missing check for 64-bit
atomics.
Reviewers: beanz, compnerd
Reviewed By: beanz, compnerd
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69444
Summary:
This patch is follow-up for D74481. It adds comments
to WithColor::defaultErrorHandler() and
WithColor::defaultWarningHandler().
Reviewers: jhenderson, dblaikie, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74742
This helps this transform occur earlier so we can fold the not
with setcc. If we delay it until after type legalization we might
have introduced instructions to widen the mask if the vselect was
widened. This can prevent the not from making it to the setcc.
We could of course add more DAG combines to handle that, but
moving this earlier is easier.
Summary:
Depends on https://reviews.llvm.org/D71899.
The third in a series of patches that ports the LLVM coroutines passes
to the new pass manager infrastructure. This patch implements 'coro-elide'.
The new pass manager infrastructure does not implicitly repeat CGSCC
pass pipelines when a function is devirtualized, and so the tests
for the new pass manager that rely on that behavior now explicitly
specify `repeat<2>`.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, lewissbaker, chandlerc, jdoerfert, junparser, deadalnix, wenlei
Reviewed By: wenlei
Subscribers: wenlei, EricWF, Prazek, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71900
Summary:
This patch has four dependencies:
1. The first in this series of patches that implement coroutine passes in the
new pass manager: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71898.
2. A patch that introduces an API for CGSCC passes to add new reference
edges to a `LazyCallGraph`, `updateCGAndAnalysisManagerForCGSCCPass`:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D72025.
3. A patch that introduces a `CallGraphUpdater` helper class that is
capable of mutating internal `LazyCallGraph` state in order to insert
new function nodes into a specific SCC: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70927.
4. And finally, a small edge case fix for updating `LazyCallGraph` that
patch 3 above happens to run into: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72226.
This is the second in a series of patches that ports the LLVM coroutines
passes to the new pass manager infrastructure. This patch implements
'coro-split'.
Some notes:
* Using the new CGSCC pass manager resulted in IR being printed in the
reverse order in some tests. To prevent FileCheck checks from failing due
to these reversed orders, this patch splits up test files that test
multiple different coroutine functions: specifically
coro-alloc-with-param.ll, coro-split-eh.ll, and coro-eh-aware-edge-split.ll.
* CoroSplit.cpp contained 2 overloads of `splitCoroutine`, one of which
dispatched to the other based on the coroutine ABI being used (C++20
switch-based versus Swift returned-continuation-based). I found this
confusing, especially with the additional branching based on `CallGraph`
vs. `LazyCallGraph`, so I removed the ABI-checking overload of
`splitCoroutine`.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, lewissbaker, chandlerc, jdoerfert, junparser, deadalnix, wenlei
Reviewed By: wenlei
Subscribers: wenlei, qcolombet, EricWF, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71899
For a file in WebKit, this brings the time spent in LiveDebugValues down
from 16 minutes to 2 minutes. The reduction comes from iterating the set
of open variable locations just once in transferRegisterDef. Post-patch,
the most expensive item inside of transferRegisterDef is a call to
VarLoc::isDescribedByReg, which we have to do.
Testing: I built LNT using the Os-g cmake cache with & without this
patch, then diffed the object files to verify there was no binary diff.
rdar://59446577
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74633
I readily admit that I don't know why this fixes the modules build, but
it seems to get things building again. Previously I saw the error
message:
http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake/9404/consoleFull#-361314398a1ca8a51-895e-46c6-af87-ce24fa4cd561
```
/Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/IRBuilderFolder.h:18:10: fatal error: cyclic dependency in module 'LLVM_intrinsic_gen': LLVM_intrinsic_gen -> LLVM_IR -> LLVM_intrinsic_gen
^
While building module 'LLVM_intrinsic_gen' imported from /Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/IRBuilder.cpp:14:
In file included from <module-includes>:1:
/Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Argument.h:19:10: fatal error: could not build module 'LLVM_IR'
~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/llvm/lib/IR/IRBuilder.cpp:14:10: fatal error: could not build module 'LLVM_intrinsic_gen'
```
And reproduced with:
cmake -G Ninja /Users/vsk/src/llvm-backup-master/llvm -DCLANG_ENABLE_ARCMT=Off -DCLANG_ENABLE_STATIC_ANALYZER=Off -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS='clang;clang-tools-extra;lld;libcxx;libcxxabi;compiler-rt;libunwind;lldb' -DLLDB_USE_SYSTEM_DEBUGSERVER=On -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=On -DLLVM_ENABLE_MODULES=On
AMDGPUCodeGenPrepare expands this most of the time, but not always. We
will always at least need a fallback option here. This is the 3rd
implementation of the same expansion in the backend. Eventually I
would like to eliminate the IR expansion (and the DAG version
obviously).
Currently the new legalizer path produces a better result, since the
IR expansion results in extra operations which need to be combined
out. Notably, the IR expansion results in multiplies by 0.
The check for 'HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS_WITHOUT_LIB' may create false
positives in RISC-V. This is reproducible when compiling LLVM natively
using GCC on a rv64gc (rv64imafdgc) host. Due to the 'A' (atomic)
extension, g++ replaces calls to libatomic operations on the
std::atomic<int> type with the native hardware instructions. As a
result, the compilation succeeds and the build system thinks it
doesn't need to pass '-latomic'.
Improve the reliability of the 'HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS_WITHOUT_LIB' test in
two steps:
1. Force a pre-increment on x (++x), which should force a call to a
libatomic function;
2. Because step 1 would resolve the increment to 'amoadd.w.aq' under
the 'A' extension, force the same operation on sub-word types, for
which there is no hardware support.
Reviewers: jfb, hintonda, smeenai, mgorny, JDevlieghere, jyknight
Reviewed By: jfb
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68964
Summary:
The first in a series of patches that ports the LLVM coroutines passes
to the new pass manager infrastructure. This patch implements
'coro-early'.
NB: All coroutines passes begin by checking that coroutine intrinsics are
declared within the LLVM IR module they're operating on. To do so, they call
`coro::declaresIntrinsics`. The next 3 patches in this series, which add new
pass manager implementations of the 'coro-split', 'coro-elide', and
'coro-cleanup' passes, use a similar pattern as the one used here: a static
function is shared across both old and new passes to detect if relevant
coroutine intrinsics are delcared. To make this pattern easier to read, this
patch adds `const` keywords to the parameters of `coro::declaresIntrinsics`.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, lewissbaker, junparser, chandlerc, deadalnix, wenlei
Reviewed By: wenlei
Subscribers: ychen, wenlei, EricWF, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71898
