TailDuplicate can run on either on SSA code or non-SSA code, as indicated to
it by MRI->isSSA() ("PreRegAlloc" here). TailDuplicate does extra work to
preserve SSA invariants when it duplicates code. This patch makes it skip
some of this extra work in the case where the code is not in SSA form.
llvm-svn: 261450
The patch has a necessary call to a function inside an assert. Which is fine
when you have asserts turned on. Not so much when they're off. Sorry about
the regression.
llvm-svn: 261447
This patch corresponds to review:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17294
It ensures that whatever block we are emitting the prologue/epilogue into, we
have the necessary scratch registers. It takes away the hard-coded register
numbers for use as scratch registers as registers that are guaranteed to be
available in the function prologue/epilogue are not guaranteed to be available
within the function body. Since we shrink-wrap, the prologue/epilogue may end
up in the function body.
llvm-svn: 261441
As discussed on PR24580, this patch adds some (more to come) initial fast-isel codegen tests to match the IR generated in clang/test/CodeGen/sse41-builtins.c
llvm-svn: 261438
Fixed a bug introduced by D16683 when a binary shuffle is simplified to a unary shuffle (with undef/zero sentinel mask indices) - if this resulted in only the second input being used combineX86ShuffleChain failed to take this into account and still referenced the first input.
llvm-svn: 261434
First small step towards fixing PR26667 - we need to ensure that combineX86ShuffleChain only gets called with a valid shuffle input node (a similar issue was found in D17041).
llvm-svn: 261433
the algorithm easily degrades into quadratic memory and time complexity.
The easiest example is a long chain of BBs that don't otherwise use a
location. The caching will add an entry for every intermediate block and
limiting the number of results doesn't help as no results are produced
until a definition is found.
Introduce a limit similar to the existing instructions-per-block limit.
This limit counts the total number of blocks checked. If the limit is
reached, entries are considered unknown. The initial value is 1000,
which avoids regressions for normal sized functions while still
limiting edge cases to reasnable memory consumption and execution time.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16123
llvm-svn: 261430
No functional change intended. Copying small (<= 64 bits) APInts isn't
expensive but bloats code by generating the slow path everywhere. Moving
doesn't care about the size of the value.
llvm-svn: 261426
This avoids unnecessarily passing them around when calling helper
functions. It may also be slightly faster to call clear() on the
datastructures instead of freshly initializing them for each block.
llvm-svn: 261407
it to actually test the new pass manager AA wiring.
This patch was extracted from the (somewhat too large) D12357 and
rebosed on top of the slightly different design of the new pass manager
AA wiring that I just landed. With this we can start testing the AA in
a thorough way with the new pass manager.
Some minor cleanups to the code in the pass was necessitated here, but
otherwise it is a very minimal change.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17372
llvm-svn: 261403
Cleanuppads may be merged together if one is the only predecessor of the
other in which case a simple transform can be performed: replace the
a cleanupret with a branch and remove an unnecessary cleanuppad.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17459
llvm-svn: 261390
TLSADDR nodes are lowered into actuall calls inside MC. In order to prevent
shrink-wrapping from pushing prologue/epilogue past them (which result
in TLS variables being accessed before the stack frame is set up), we
put markers, so that the stack gets adjusted properly.
Thanks to Quentin Colombet for guidance/help on how to fix this problem!
llvm-svn: 261387
Summary:
Instead of trying to replace SMRD instructions with a VGPR base pointer
with an equivalent MUBUF instruction, we now copy the base pointer to
SGPRs using v_readfirstlane.
This is safe to do, because any load selected as an SMRD instruction
has been proven to have a uniform base pointer, so each thread in the
wave will have the same pointer value in VGPRs.
This will fix some errors on VI from trying to replace SMRD instructions
with addr64-enabled MUBUF instructions that don't exist.
Reviewers: arsenm, cfang, nhaehnle
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17305
llvm-svn: 261385
Figured this would be a problem, but didn't want to jump the gun - large
inputs demonstrate it pretty easily (mostly for type units, but might as
well do the same for CUs too). A random sample 6m27s -> 27s change.
Also, by checking this up-front for CUs (rather than when building the
cu_index) we can probably provide better error messages (see FIXMEs),
hopefully providing the name of the CUs rather than just their
signature.
llvm-svn: 261364
Summary:
When optimizing for size, sqrt calls can be incorrectly selected as
AVX512 VSQRT instructions. This is because X86InstrAVX512.td has a
`Requires<[OptForSize]>` in its `avx512_sqrt_scalar` multiclass
definition. Even if the target does not support AVX512, the class can
apparently still be chosen, leading to an incorrect selection of
`vsqrtss`.
In PR26625, this lead to an assertion: Reg >= X86::FP0 && Reg <=
X86::FP6 && "Expected FP register!", because the `vsqrtss` instruction
requires an XMM register, which is not available on i686 CPUs.
Reviewers: grosbach, resistor, joker.eph
Subscribers: spatel, emaste, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17414
llvm-svn: 261360
Now that we don't always add an element to AllocatedStackSlots if we
don't find a pre-existing unallocated stack slot, bumping
StatepointMaxSlotsRequired to `NumSlots + 1` is not correct. Instead
bump the statistic near the push_back, to
Builder.FuncInfo.StatepointStackSlots.size().
llvm-svn: 261348
The check on MFI->getObjectSize() has to be on the FrameIndex, not on
the index of the FrameIndex in AllocatedStackSlots. Weirdly, the tests
I added in rL261336 didn't catch this.
llvm-svn: 261347
This patch enables the vectorization of first-order recurrences. A first-order
recurrence is a non-reduction recurrence relation in which the value of the
recurrence in the current loop iteration equals a value defined in the previous
iteration. The load PRE of the GVN pass often creates these recurrences by
hoisting loads from within loops.
In this patch, we add a new recurrence kind for first-order phi nodes and
attempt to vectorize them if possible. Vectorization is performed by shuffling
the values for the current and previous iterations. The vectorization cost
estimate is updated to account for the added shuffle instruction.
Contributed-by: Matthew Simpson and Chad Rosier <mcrosier@codeaurora.org>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16197
llvm-svn: 261346
NFCI. They key motivation here is that I'd like to use
SmallBitVector::all() in a later change. Also, using a bit vector here
seemed better in general.
The only interesting change here is that in the failure case of
allocateStackSlot, we no longer (the equivalent of) push_back(true) to
AllocatedStackSlots. As far as I can tell, this is fine, since we'd
never re-use those slots in the same StatepointLoweringState instance.
Technically there was no need to change the operator[] type accesses to
set() and test(), but I thought it'd be nice to make it obvious that
we're using something other than a std::vector like thing.
llvm-svn: 261337
