the library routine shared with the new PM and other code.
This assert checks that when LCSSA preservation is requested we start in
LCSSA form. Without this early assert, given *very* complex test cases
we can hit an assert or crash much later on when trying to preserve
LCSSA.
The new PM's loop simplify doesn't need to (and indeed can't) preserve
LCSSA as the new PM doesn't deal in transforms in the dependency graph.
But we asked the library to and shockingly, this didn't work very well!
Stop doing that. Now the assert will tell us immediately with existing
test cases. Before this, it took a pretty convoluted input to trigger
this.
However, sinking the assert also found a bug in LoopUnroll where we
asked simplifyLoop to preserve LCSSA *right before we reform it*. That's
kinda silly and unsurprising that it wasn't available. =D Stop doing
that too.
We also would assert that the unrolled loop was in LCSSA even if
preserving LCSSA was never requested! I don't have a test case or
anything here. I spotted it by inspection and it seems quite obvious. No
logic change anyways, that's just avoiding a spurrious assert.
llvm-svn: 292710
This adds the last remaining core feature of the loop pass pipeline in
the new PM and removes the last of the really egregious hacks in the
LICM tests.
Sadly, this requires really substantial changes in the unittests in
order to provide and maintain simplified loops. This is particularly
hard because for example LoopSimplify will try to fold undef branches to
an ideal direction and simplify the loop accordingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28766
llvm-svn: 292709
This is a stub implementation of the `-s` or `--format` option that
allows the user to specify the demangling style. Since we only support
the Itanium (GNU) style demangling, auto is synonymous with `gnu`.
Simply swallow the option to permit some level of commandline
compatibility.
llvm-svn: 292706
Re-Commit r292543 with a fix for the situation when the chain end is
MBB.end().
This function can be used to accumulate the set of all read and modified
register in a sequence of instructions.
Use this code in AArch64A57FPLoadBalancing::scavengeRegister() to prove
the concept.
- The AArch64A57LoadBalancing code is using a backwards analysis now
which is irrespective of kill flags. This is the main motivation for
this change.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22082
llvm-svn: 292705
Summary:
Under option -mergefunc-preserve-debug-info we:
- Do not create a new function for a thunk.
- Retain the debug info for a thunk's parameters (and associated
instructions for the debug info) from the entry block.
Note: -debug will display the algorithm at work.
- Create debug-info for the call (to the shared implementation) made by
a thunk and its return value.
- Erase the rest of the function, retaining the (minimally sized) entry
block to create a thunk.
- Preserve a thunk's call site to point to the thunk even when both occur
within the same translation unit, to aid debugability. Note that this
behaviour differs from the underlying -mergefunc implementation which
modifies the thunk's call site to point to the shared implementation
when both occur within the same translation unit.
Reviewers: echristo, eeckstein, dblaikie, aprantl, friss
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: davide, fhahn, jfb, mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28075
llvm-svn: 292702
Summary:
Specifically, we upgrade llvm.nvvm.:
* brev{32,64}
* clz.{i,ll}
* popc.{i,ll}
* abs.{i,ll}
* {min,max}.{i,ll,u,ull}
* h2f
These either map directly to an existing LLVM target-generic
intrinsic or map to a simple LLVM target-generic idiom.
In all cases, we check that the code we generate is lowered to PTX as we
expect.
These builtins don't need to be backfilled in clang: They're not
accessible to user code from nvcc.
Reviewers: tra
Subscribers: majnemer, cfe-commits, llvm-commits, jholewinski
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28793
llvm-svn: 292694
Summary:
DADToDAG has access to TargetLowering, but not vice versa, so this is
the more general location for these functions.
NFC
Reviewers: tra
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28795
llvm-svn: 292693
Summary:
Currently we return undef, but we're in the process of changing the
LangRef so that llvm.sqrt behaves like the other math intrinsics,
matching the return value of the standard libcall but not setting errno.
This change is legal even without the LangRef change because currently
calling llvm.sqrt(x) where x is negative is spec'ed to be UB. But in
practice it's also safe because we're simply constant-folding fewer
inputs: Inputs >= -0 get constant-folded as before, but inputs < -0 now
aren't constant-folded, because ConstantFoldFP aborts if the host math
function raises an fp exception.
Reviewers: hfinkel, efriedma, sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28929
llvm-svn: 292692
Newer ppc supports unaligned memory access, it reduces the cost of unaligned memory access significantly. This patch handles this case in PPCTTIImpl::getMemoryOpCost.
This patch fixes pr31492.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28630
llvm-svn: 292680
Don't call `isTriviallyDeadInstructions()` once we discover that
an instruction is dead. Instead, set DFS number zero (as suggested
by Danny) and forget about it (this also speeds up things as we
won't try to reprocess that block).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28930
llvm-svn: 292676
Translating the constant can create more VRegs, which can invalidate the
reference into the DenseMap. So we have to look up the value again after all
that's happened.
llvm-svn: 292675
In order to use sanitizers on Windows, we need to link against many runtime
libraries which will depend on the target being created (executable or dll) and
the c runtime library used (MT/MD).
By default, cmake uses link.exe for linking, which fails because we don't
specify the appropiate dependencies. As we don't want to consider all of that
possible situations which depends on the implementation of the compiler-rt, the
simplest option is to change the rules for linking executables and shared
libraries, using the compiler instead of link.exe.
Clang driver will consider the sanitizer flags, and automatically provide the
required libraries to the linker.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27869
llvm-svn: 292669
This adds the following to the new PM based inliner in PGO mode:
* Use block frequency analysis to derive callsite's profile count and use
that to adjust thresholds of hot and cold callsites.
* Incrementally update the BFI of the caller after a callee gets inlined
into it. This incremental update is only within an invocation of the run
method - BFI is not preserved across calls to run.
Update the function entry count of the callee after inlining it into a
caller.
* I've tuned the thresholds for the hot and cold callsites using a hacked
up version of the old inliner that explicitly computes BFI on a set of
internal benchmarks and spec. Once the new PM based pipeline stabilizes
(IIRC Chandler mentioned there are known issues) I'll benchmark this
again and adjust the thresholds if required.
Inliner PGO support.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28331
llvm-svn: 292666
While the builder pattern has proven useful for certain other
larger types, in this case it was hampering the ability to use
the data structure, as for runtime access we need a map that
we can efficiently read from and write to. So the two are merged
into a single data structure that can efficiently be read to,
written from, deserialized from bytes, and serialized to bytes.
llvm-svn: 292664
Summary:
Allow non-ODR weak/linkonce non-prevailing copies to be marked
as available_externally in the index. Add support for dropping these to
declarations in the backend.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini, pcc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28806
llvm-svn: 292656
Unfortunately, recognizing these in value tracking may cause us to hit
a hack in InstCombiner::visitICmpInst() more often:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-January/109340.html
...but besides being the obviously Right Thing To Do, there's a clear
codegen win from identifying these patterns for several targets.
llvm-svn: 292655
