It is breaking the build on the buildbots but works fine on my machine, I revert
while trying to understand what happens (it appears to depend on the compiler used
to build, I probably used a C++11 feature that is not perfectly supported by some
of the buildbots).
This reverts commit feb3176c4d006f99af8b40373abd56215a90e7cc.
llvm-svn: 217973
This takes advanatage of the CBZ and CBNZ instruction to further optimize the
common null check pattern into a single instruction.
This is related to rdar://problem/18358882.
llvm-svn: 217972
This adds the last two missing floating-point condition codes (FCMP_UEQ and
FCMP_ONE) also to the branch selection. In these two cases an additonal branch
instruction is required.
This also adds unit tests to checks all the different condition codes.
This is related o rdar://problem/18358882.
llvm-svn: 217966
Summary:
I had only tested this code for ARMv7 and ARMv8. This patch adds several
fallback paths if the processor does not support dmb ish:
- dmb sy if a cortex-M with support for dmb
- mcr p15, #0, r0, c7, c10, #5 for ARMv6 (special instruction equivalent to a DMB)
These fallback paths were chosen based on the code for fence seq_cst.
Thanks to luqmana for having noticed this bug.
Test Plan: Added more cases to atomic-load-store.ll + make check-all
Reviewers: jfb, t.p.northover, luqmana
Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5304
llvm-svn: 217965
Only 1 decimal place should be printed for inline immediates.
Other constants should be hex constants.
Does not include f64 tests because folding those inline
immediates currently does not work.
llvm-svn: 217964
This improves other optimizations such as LSR. A sext may be added to the
compare's other operand, but this can often be hoisted outside of the loop.
llvm-svn: 217953
Example:
define i1 @foo(i32 %a) {
%shr = ashr i32 -9, %a
%cmp = icmp ne i32 %shr, -5
ret i1 %cmp
}
Before this fix, the instruction combiner wrongly thought that %shr
could have never been equal to -5. Therefore, %cmp was always folded to 'true'.
However, when %a is equal to 1, then %cmp evaluates to 'false'. Therefore,
in this example, it is not valid to fold %cmp to 'true'.
The problem was only affecting the case where the comparison was between
negative quantities where one of the quantities was obtained from arithmetic
shift of a negative constant.
This patch fixes the problem with the wrong folding (fixes PR20945).
With this patch, the 'icmp' from the example is now simplified to a
comparison between %a and 1. This still allows us to get rid of the arithmetic
shift (%shr).
llvm-svn: 217950
Summary: This directive is used to tell the assembler to reject DSP-specific instructions.
Reviewers: dsanders
Reviewed By: dsanders
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5142
llvm-svn: 217946
First step done in this commit is to get flush out enough of the
SymbolizerGetOpInfo() routine to symbolic an X86_64 hello world .o and
its loading of the literal string and call to printf. Also the code to
symbolicate the X86_64_RELOC_SUBTRACTOR relocation and a test is also
added to show a slightly more complicated case.
Next will be to flush out enough of SymbolizerSymbolLookUp() to get the
literal string “Hello world” printed as a comment on the instruction that load
the pointer to it.
llvm-svn: 217893
By class-instance values I mean 'Class<Arg>' in 'Class<Arg>.Field' or in
'Other<Class<Arg>>' (syntactically s SimpleValue). This is to differentiate
from unnamed/anonymous record definitions (syntactically an ObjectBody) which
are not affected by this change.
Consider the testcase:
class Struct<int i> {
int I = !shl(i, 1);
int J = !shl(I, 1);
}
class Class<Struct s> {
int Class_J = s.J;
}
multiclass MultiClass<int i> {
def Def : Class<Struct<i>>;
}
defm Defm : MultiClass<2>;
Before this fix, DefmDef.Class_J yields !shl(I, 1) instead of 8.
This is the sequence of events. We start with this:
multiclass MultiClass<int i> {
def Def : Class<Struct<i>>;
}
During ParseDef the anonymous object for the class-instance value is created:
multiclass Multiclass<int i> {
def anonymous_0 : Struct<i>;
def Def : Class<NAME#anonymous_0>;
}
Then class Struct<i> is added to anonymous_0. Also Class<NAME#anonymous_0> is
added to Def:
multiclass Multiclass<int i> {
def anonymous_0 {
int I = !shl(i, 1);
int J = !shl(I, 1);
}
def Def {
int Class_J = NAME#anonymous_0.J;
}
}
So far so good but then we move on to instantiating this in the defm
by substituting the template arg 'i'.
This is how the anonymous prototype looks after fully instantiating.
defm Defm = {
def Defmanonymous_0 {
int I = 4;
int J = !shl(I, 1);
}
Note that we only resolved the reference to the template arg. The
non-template-arg reference in 'J' has not been resolved yet.
Then we go on to instantiating the Def prototype:
def DefmDef {
int Class_J = NAME#anonymous_0.J;
}
Which is resolved to Defmanonymous_0.J and then to !shl(I, 1).
When we fully resolve each record in a defm, Defmanonymous_0.J does get set
to 8 but that's too late for its use.
The patch adds a new attribute to the Record class that indicates that this
def is actually a class-instance value that may be *used* by other defs in a
multiclass. (This is unlike regular defs which don't reference each other and
thus can be resolved indepedently.) They are then fully resolved before the
other defs while the multiclass is instantiated.
I added vg_leak to the new test. I am not sure if this is necessary but I
don't think I have a way to test it. I can also check in without the XFAIL
and let the bots test this part.
Also tested that X86.td.expanded and AAarch64.td.expanded were unchange before
and after this change. (This issue triggering this problem is a WIP patch.)
Part of <rdar://problem/17688758>
llvm-svn: 217886
Summary: Changed error messages to be more informative and to resemble other clang/llvm error messages (first letter is lower case, no ending punctuation) and updated corresponding tests.
Reviewers: dsanders
Reviewed By: dsanders
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5065
llvm-svn: 217873
The default implementation of getCmpSelInstrCost, which provides the cost of
icmp/fcmp/select instructions, did not deal sensibly with illegal vector types
that were scalarized. We'd ask for the legalization cost of the vector type,
which would return something like (4, f64) given an input of <4 x double>, and
we'd then check the TLI status of the ISD opcode on that scalar type. This would
result in querying (ISD::VSELECT, f64), for example. Amusingly enough,
ISD::VSELECT on scalar types is marked as Legal by default (as with most other
operations), and most backends never change this because VSELECT is never
generated on scalars. However, seeing the resulting operation as Legal, we'd
neglect to add the scalarization cost before returning. The result is that we'd
grossly under-estimate the cost of cmps/selects on illegal vector types.
Now, if type legalization clearly results in scalarization, we skip the early
return and add the scalarization cost.
llvm-svn: 217859
Teach yaml2obj how to make a bigobj COFF file. Like the rest of LLVM,
we automatically decide whether or not to use regular COFF or bigobj
COFF on the fly depending on how many sections the resulting object
would have.
This ends the task of adding bigobj support to LLVM.
N.B. This was tested by forcing yaml2obj to be used in bigobj mode
regardless of the number of sections. While a dedicated test was
written, the smallest I could make it was 36 MB (!) of yaml and it still
took a significant amount of time to execute on a powerful machine.
llvm-svn: 217858
This finishes the ability of llvm-objdump to print out all information from
the LC_DYLD_INFO load command.
The -bind option prints out symbolic references that dyld must resolve
immediately.
The -lazy-bind option prints out symbolc reference that are lazily resolved on
first use.
The -weak-bind option prints out information about symbols which dyld must
try to coalesce across images.
llvm-svn: 217853
that we don't use VSELECT and directly emit an addsub synthetic node.
Also remove a stale comment referencing VSELECT.
The test case is updated to use 'core2' which only has SSE3, not SSE4.1,
and it still passes. Previously it would not because we lacked
sufficient blend support to legalize the VSELECT.
llvm-svn: 217849
ADDSUBPD nodes out of blends of adds and subs.
This allows us to actually form these instructions with SSE3 rather than
only forming them when we had both SSE3 for the ADDSUB instructions and
SSE4.1 for the blend instructions. ;] Kind-of important.
I've adjusted the CPU requirements on one of the tests to demonstrate
this kicking in nicely for an SSE3 cpu configuration.
llvm-svn: 217848
This adds the missing test case for the previous commit:
Allow handling of vectors during return lowering for little endian machines.
Sorry for the noise.
llvm-svn: 217847
This changes the debug output of the llvm-cov tool to consistently
write to stderr, and moves the highlighting output closer to where
it's relevant.
llvm-svn: 217838
In r217746, though it was supposed to be NFC, I broke llvm-cov's
handling of showing regions without showing counts. This should've
shown up in the existing tests, except they were checking debug output
that was displayed regardless of what was actually output. I've moved
the relevant debug output to a more appropriate place so that the
tests catch this kind of thing.
llvm-svn: 217835
This lowers frem to a runtime libcall inside fast-isel.
The test case also checks the CallLoweringInfo bug that was exposed by this
change.
This fixes rdar://problem/18342783.
llvm-svn: 217833
Summary:
Expand list of supported targets for Mips to include mips32 r1.
Previously it only include r2. More patches are coming where there is
a difference but in the current patches as pushed upstream, r1 and r2
are equivalent.
Test Plan:
simplestorefp1.ll
add new build bots at mips to test this flavor at both -O0 and -O2
Reviewers: dsanders
Reviewed By: dsanders
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5306
llvm-svn: 217821
On MachO, and MachO only, we cannot have a truly empty function since that
breaks the linker logic for atomizing the section.
When we are emitting a frame pointer, the presence of an unreachable will
create a cfi instruction pointing past the last instruction. This is perfectly
fine. The FDE information encodes the pc range it applies to. If some tool
cannot handle this, we should explicitly say which bug we are working around
and only work around it when it is actually relevant (not for ELF for example).
Given the unreachable we could omit the .cfi_def_cfa_register, but then
again, we could also omit the entire function prologue if we wanted to.
llvm-svn: 217801
introduced in r217629.
We were returning the old sext instead of the new zext as the promoted instruction!
Thanks Joerg Sonnenberger for the test case.
llvm-svn: 217800
Peephole optimization was folding MOVSDrm, which is a zero-extending double
precision floating point load, into ADDPDrr, which is a SIMD add of two packed
double precision floating point values.
(before)
%vreg21<def> = MOVSDrm <fi#0>, 1, %noreg, 0, %noreg; mem:LD8[%7](align=16)(tbaa=<badref>) VR128:%vreg21
%vreg23<def,tied1> = ADDPDrr %vreg20<tied0>, %vreg21; VR128:%vreg23,%vreg20,%vreg21
(after)
%vreg23<def,tied1> = ADDPDrm %vreg20<tied0>, <fi#0>, 1, %noreg, 0, %noreg; mem:LD8[%7](align=16)(tbaa=<badref>) VR128:%vreg23,%vreg20
X86InstrInfo::foldMemoryOperandImpl already had the logic that prevented this
from happening. However the check wasn't being conducted for loads from stack
objects. This commit factors out the logic into a new function and uses it for
checking loads from stack slots are not zero-extending loads.
rdar://problem/18236850
llvm-svn: 217799
Add some more tests to make sure better operand
choices are still made. Leave some cases that seem
to have no reason to ever be e64 alone.
llvm-svn: 217789
I noticed some odd looking cases where addr64 wasn't set
when storing to a pointer in an SGPR. This seems to be intentional,
and partially tested already.
The documentation seems to describe addr64 in terms of which registers
addressing modifiers come from, but I would expect to always need
addr64 when using 64-bit pointers. If no offset is applied,
it makes sense to not need to worry about doing a 64-bit add
for the final address. A small immediate offset can be applied,
so is it OK to not have addr64 set if a carry is necessary when adding
the base pointer in the resource to the offset?
llvm-svn: 217785
