Summary:
Also add a stricter post-condition for IndVarSimplify.
Fixes PR25578. Test case by Michael Zolotukhin.
Reviewers: hfinkel, atrick, mzolotukhin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15059
llvm-svn: 254977
254950 ended up being not NFC. The previous code was overriding the flags for whether an instruction read or wrote memory using the target specific flags returned via TTI. I'd missed this in my refactoring. Since I mistakenly built only x86 and didn't notice the number of unsupported tests, I didn't catch that before the original checkin.
This raises an interesting issue though. Given we have function attributes (i.e. readonly, readnone, argmemonly) which describe the aliasing of intrinsics, why does TTI have this information overriding the instruction definition at all? I see no reason for this, but decided to preserve existing behavior for the moment. The root issue might be that we don't have a "writeonly" attribute.
Original commit message:
[EarlyCSE] Simplify and invert ParseMemoryInst [NFCI]
Restructure ParseMemoryInst - which was introduced to abstract over target specific load and stores instructions - to just query the underlying instructions. In theory, this could be slightly slower than caching the results, but in practice, it's very unlikely to be measurable.
The simple query scheme makes it far easier to understand, and much easier to extend with new queries. Given I'm about to need to add new query types, doing the cleanup first seemed worthwhile.
Do we still believe the target specific intrinsic handling is worthwhile in EarlyCSE? It adds quite a bit of complexity and makes the code harder to read. Being able to delete the abstraction entirely would be wonderful.
llvm-svn: 254957
Restructure ParseMemoryInst - which was introduced to abstract over target specific load and stores instructions - to just query the underlying instructions. In theory, this could be slightly slower than caching the results, but in practice, it's very unlikely to be measurable.
The simple query scheme makes it far easier to understand, and much easier to extend with new queries. Given I'm about to need to add new query types, doing the cleanup first seemed worthwhile.
Do we still believe the target specific intrinsic handling is worthwhile in EarlyCSE? It adds quite a bit of complexity and makes the code harder to read. Being able to delete the abstraction entirely would be wonderful.
llvm-svn: 254950
When the notion of target specific memory intrinsics was introduced to EarlyCSE, the commit confused the notions of volatile and simple memory access. Since I'm about to start working on this area, cleanup the naming so that patches aren't horribly confusing. Note that the actual implementation was always bailing if the load or store wasn't simple.
Reminder:
- "volatile" - C++ volatile, can't remove any memory operations, but in principal unordered
- "ordered" - imposes ordering constraints on other nearby memory operations
- "atomic" - can't be split or sheared. In LLVM terms, all "ordered" operations are also atomic so the predicate "isAtomic" is often used.
- "simple" - a load which is none of the above. These are normal loads and what most of the optimizer works with.
llvm-svn: 254805
time.
The new overloaded function is used when an attribute is added to a
large number of slots of an AttributeSet (for example, to function
parameters). This is much faster than calling AttributeSet::addAttribute
once per slot, because AttributeSet::getImpl (which calls
FoldingSet::FIndNodeOrInsertPos) is called only once per function
instead of once per slot.
With this commit, clang compiles a file which used to take over 22
minutes in just 13 seconds.
rdar://problem/23581000
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15085
llvm-svn: 254491
Terrifyingly, one of them is a mishandling of floating point vectors
in Constant::isZero(). How exactly this issue survived this long
is beyond me.
llvm-svn: 253655
Optimizations like LoadPRE in GVN will insert new instructions.
If the insertion point is in a already processed BB, they should
get a value number explicitly. If the insertion point is after
current instruction, then just leave it. However, current GVN framework
has no support for it.
In this patch, we just bail out if a VN can't be found.
Dfferential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14670
A test/Transforms/GVN/pr25440.ll
M lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp
llvm-svn: 253536
This bug would manifest in some very specific cases where all the following
conditions are fullfilled:
- GVN didn't remove block
- The regular GVN iteration didn't change the IR
- PRE is enabled
- PRE will not split critical edge
- The last instruction processed by PRE didn't change the IR
Because the CallGraph PassManager relies on this returned value to decide
if it needs to recompute a node after the execution of Function passes,
not returning the right value can lead to unexpected results.
Fix for: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24715
Patch by Wenxiang Qiu <vincentqiuuu@gmail.com>
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 253518
Note, this was reviewed (and more details are in) http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151109/312083.html
These intrinsics currently have an explicit alignment argument which is
required to be a constant integer. It represents the alignment of the
source and dest, and so must be the minimum of those.
This change allows source and dest to each have their own alignments
by using the alignment attribute on their arguments. The alignment
argument itself is removed.
There are a few places in the code for which the code needs to be
checked by an expert as to whether using only src/dest alignment is
safe. For those places, they currently take the minimum of src/dest
alignments which matches the current behaviour.
For example, code which used to read:
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* %dest, i8* %src, i32 500, i32 8, i1 false)
will now read:
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* align 8 %dest, i8* align 8 %src, i32 500, i1 false)
For out of tree owners, I was able to strip alignment from calls using sed by replacing:
(call.*llvm\.memset.*)i32\ [0-9]*\,\ i1 false\)
with:
$1i1 false)
and similarly for memmove and memcpy.
I then added back in alignment to test cases which needed it.
A similar commit will be made to clang which actually has many differences in alignment as now
IRBuilder can generate different source/dest alignments on calls.
In IRBuilder itself, a new argument was added. Instead of calling:
CreateMemCpy(Dst, Src, getInt64(Size), DstAlign, /* isVolatile */ false)
you now call
CreateMemCpy(Dst, Src, getInt64(Size), DstAlign, SrcAlign, /* isVolatile */ false)
There is a temporary class (IntegerAlignment) which takes the source alignment and rejects
implicit conversion from bool. This is to prevent isVolatile here from passing its default
parameter to the source alignment.
Note, changes in future can now be made to codegen. I didn't change anything here, but this
change should enable better memcpy code sequences.
Reviewed by Hal Finkel.
llvm-svn: 253511
We sometimes create intermediate subtract instructions during
reassociation. Adding these to the worklist to revisit exposes many
additional reassociation opportunities.
Patch by Aditya Nandakumar.
llvm-svn: 253240
We tried to move the insertion point beyond instructions like landingpad
and cleanuppad.
However, we *also* tried to move past catchpad. This is problematic
because catchpad is also a terminator.
This fixes PR25541.
llvm-svn: 253238
Summary: Moving landingpads into successor basic blocks makes the
verifier sad. Teach Sink that much like PHI nodes and terminator
instructions, landingpads (and cleanuppads, etc.) may not be moved
between basic blocks.
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14475
llvm-svn: 253182
This allows us to transform the below loop into a memcpy.
void test(unsigned *__restrict__ a, unsigned *__restrict__ b) {
for (int i = 2047; i >= 0; --i) {
a[i] = b[i];
}
}
This is the memcpy version of r251518, which added support for memset with
negative strided loops.
llvm-svn: 253091
First create a list of candidates, then transform. This simplifies the code in
that you have don't have to worry that you may be using an invalidated
iterator.
Previously, each time we created a memset/memcpy we would reevaluate the entire
loop potentially resulting in lots of redundant work for large basic blocks.
llvm-svn: 252817
This is fix for PR24059.
When we are hoisting instruction above some condition it may turn out
that metadata on this instruction was control dependant on the condition.
This metadata becomes invalid and we need to drop it.
This patch should cover most obvious places of speculative execution (which
I have found by greping isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute). I think there are more
cases but at least this change covers the severe ones.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14398
llvm-svn: 252604
Summary:
LAA currently generates a set of SCEV predicates that must be checked by users.
In the case of Loop Distribute/Loop Load Elimination, no such predicates could have
been emitted, since we don't allow stride versioning. However, in the future there
could be SCEV predicates that will need to be checked.
This change adds support for SCEV predicate versioning in the Loop Distribute, Loop
Load Eliminate and the loop versioning infrastructure.
Reviewers: anemet
Subscribers: mssimpso, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14240
llvm-svn: 252467
Some implicit ilist iterator conversions have crept back into Analysis,
Transforms, Hexagon, and llvm-stress. This removes them.
I'll commit a patch immediately after this to disallow them (in a
separate patch so that it's easy to revert if necessary).
llvm-svn: 252371
This marker prevents optimization passes from adding 'tail' or
'musttail' markers to a call. Is is used to prevent tail call
optimization from being performed on the call.
rdar://problem/22667622
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12923
llvm-svn: 252368
Summary:
This change makes the `isImpliedCondition` interface similar to the rest
of the functions in ValueTracking (in that it takes a DataLayout,
AssumptionCache etc.). This is an NFC, intended to make a later diff
less noisy.
Depends on D14369
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14391
llvm-svn: 252333
In my previous change to CVP (251606), I made CVP much more aggressive about trying to constant fold comparisons. This patch is a reversal in direction. Rather than being agressive about every compare, we restore the non-block local restriction for most, and then try hard for compares feeding returns.
The motivation for this is two fold:
* The more I thought about it, the less comfortable I got with the possible compile time impact of the other approach. There have been no reported issues, but after talking to a couple of folks, I've come to the conclusion the time probably isn't justified.
* It turns out we need to know the context to leverage the full power of LVI. In particular, asking about something at the end of it's block (the use of a compare in a return) will frequently get more precise results than something in the middle of a block. This is an implementation detail, but it's also hard to get around since mid-block queries have to reason about possible throwing instructions and don't get to use most of LVI's block focused infrastructure. This will become particular important when combined with http://reviews.llvm.org/D14263.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14271
llvm-svn: 252032
