The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
Summary:
Once a gc.statepoint has been rewritten to relocate live references, the
SSA values represent physical pointers instead of logical references.
Logical dereferencability does not imply physical dereferencability and
after RewriteStatepointsForGC has run any attributes that imply
dereferencability of the logical references need to be stripped.
This current approach is conservative, and can be made more precise
later if needed. For starters, we need to strip dereferencable
attributes only from pointers that live in the GC address space.
Reviewers: reames, pgavlin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10105
llvm-svn: 238883
Summary:
A later change that has RewriteStatepointsForGC change function
attributes throughout the module depends on this.
Reviewers: reames, pgavlin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10104
llvm-svn: 238882
Correct assertion would be that there is no other uses from chain we are currently cloning. It is ok to have other uses of values not from this chain.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9882
llvm-svn: 237899
This change adds a new GC strategy for supporting the CoreCLR runtime.
This strategy is currently identical to Statepoint-example GC,
but is necessary for several upcoming changes specific to CoreCLR, such as:
1. Base-pointers not explicitly reported for interior pointers
2. Different format for stack-map encoding
3. Location of Safe-point polls: polls are only needed before loop-back edges and before tail-calls (not needed at function-entry)
4. Runtime specific handshake between calls to managed/unmanaged functions.
llvm-svn: 237753
When relocating a pointer, we need to determine a base pointer for the derived pointer being relocated. We have limited support for handling a pointer extracted from a vector; the current code only handled the case where the entire vector was known to contain base pointers. This patch extends the reasoning to handle chains of insertelements where the indices are constants. This case turns out to be fairly common in vectorized code. We can now handle vectors which contains mixtures of base and derived pointers provided the insertelements use constant indices.
Note that this doesn't solve the general problem. To handle variable indexed insertelements, we'd need to scalarize and introduce conditional branching based on the index. Alternatively, we could eagerly scalarize, but the code structure doesn't currently make either fix easy. The patch also doesn't handle shufflevector or other vector manipulation for much the same reasons. I plan to defer this work until I have a motivating test case.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9676
llvm-svn: 237200
Summary:
This patch is to rename some variables to CamelCase in gc_relocate
related functions. There is no functionality change.
Patch by Chen Li!
Reviewers: reames, AndyAyers, sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9681
llvm-svn: 237069
Summary:
In RewriteStatepointsForGC pass, we create a gc_relocate intrinsic for
each relocated pointer, and the gc_relocate has the same type with the
pointer. During the creation of gc_relocate intrinsic, llvm requires to
mangle its type. However, llvm does not support mangling of all possible
types. RewriteStatepointsForGC will hit an assertion failure when it
tries to create a gc_relocate for pointer to vector of pointers because
mangling for vector of pointers is not supported.
This patch changes the way RewriteStatepointsForGC pass creates
gc_relocate. For each relocated pointer, we erase the type of pointers
and create an unified gc_relocate of type i8 addrspace(1)*. Then a
bitcast is inserted to convert the gc_relocate to the correct type. In
this way, gc_relocate does not need to deal with different types of
pointers and the unsupported type mangling is no longer a problem. This
change would also ease further merge when LLVM erases types of pointers
and introduces an unified pointer type.
Some minor changes are also introduced to gc_relocate related part in
InstCombineCalls, CodeGenPrepare, and Verifier accordingly.
Patch by Chen Li!
Reviewers: reames, AndyAyers, sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9592
llvm-svn: 237009
There can be various constant pointers in the IR which do not get relocated at a safepoint. One example is the address of a global variable. Another example is a pointer created via inttoptr. Note that the optimizer itself likes to create such inttoptrs when locally propagating constants through dynamically dead code.
To deal with this, we need to exclude uses of constants from contributing to the liveness of a safepoint which might reach that use. At some later date, it might be worth exploring what could be done to support the relocation of various special types of "constants", but that's future work.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9236
llvm-svn: 235821
Before we had real liveness, we needed to track every value that base pointer
insertion code created because these now might be live. We now just rerun
the data flow liveness algorithm (which is actually faster!) and no longer
need the associated code.
llvm-svn: 234827
Use early-return style that's preferred in LLVM and updating the naming in places I touched with other changes in the last few days. Hopefully, NFC.
llvm-svn: 234785
We use dummy calls to adjust the liveness of values over statepoints in the midst of the insertion. If there are no values which need held live, there's no point in actually inserting the holder.
llvm-svn: 234779
Since we're restructuring the CFG, we also need to make sure to update the analsis passes. While I'm touching the code, I dedicided to restructure it a bit. The code involved here was very confusing. This change moves the normalization to essentially being a pre-pass before the main insertion work and updates a few comments to actually say what is happening and *why*.
The restructuring should be covered by existing tests. I couldn't easily see how to create a test for the invalidation bug. Suggestions welcome.
llvm-svn: 234769
This is related to the issues addressed in 234651. These assertions check the properties ensured by that change at the place of use. Note that a similiar property is checked in checkBasicSSA, but without the reachability constraint. Technically, the liveness would be correct to include unreachable values, but this would be problematic for actual relocation.
llvm-svn: 234766
The check in question is attempting to help find cases where we haven't relocated a pointer at a safepoint we should have. It does this by coercing the value to null at any safepoint which doesn't relocate it.
Unfortunately, this turns out to be rather expensive in terms of memory usage and time. The number of stores inserted can grow with O(number of values x number of statepoints). On at least one example I looked at, over half of peak memory usage was coming from this check.
With this change, the check is no longer enabled by default in Asserts builds. It is enabled for expensive asserts builds and has a command line option to enable it in both Asserts and non-Asserts builds.
llvm-svn: 234761
When rewriting statepoints to make relocations explicit, we need to have a conservative but consistent notion of where a particular pointer is live at a particular site. The old code just used dominance, which is correct, but decidedly more conservative then it needed to be. This patch implements a simple dataflow algorithm that's run one per function (well, twice counting fixup after base pointer insertion). There's still lots of room to make this faster, but it's fast enough for all practical purposes today.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8674
llvm-svn: 234657
After submitting 234651, I noticed I hadn't responded to a review comment by mjacob. This patch addresses that comment and fixes a Release only build problem due to an unused variable.
llvm-svn: 234653
Two related small changes:
Various dominance based queries about liveness can get confused if we're talking about unreachable blocks. To avoid reasoning about such cases, just remove them before rewriting statepoints.
Remove single entry phis (likely left behind by LCSSA) to reduce the number of live values.
Both of these are motivated by http://reviews.llvm.org/D8674 which will be submitted shortly.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8675
llvm-svn: 234651
This patch adds limited support for inserting explicit relocations when there's a vector of pointers live over the statepoint. This doesn't handle the case where the vector contains a mix of base and non-base pointers; that's future work.
The current implementation just scalarizes the vector over the gc.statepoint before doing the explicit rewrite. An alternate approach would be to plumb the vector all the way though the backend lowering, but doing that appears challenging. In particular, the size of the indirect spill slot is currently assumed to be sizeof(pointer) throughout the backend.
In practice, this is enough to allow running the SLP and Loop vectorizers before RewriteStatepointsForGC.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8671
llvm-svn: 234647
The assertion here was more expensive then it needed to be. We're only inserting allocas in the entry block, so we only need to consider ones in the entry block.
llvm-svn: 233362
RewriteStatepointsForGC pass emits an alloca for each GC pointer which will be relocated. It then inserts stores after def and all relocations, and inserts loads before each use as well. In the end, mem2reg is used to update IR with relocations in SSA form.
However, there is a problem with inserting stores for values defined by invoke instructions. The code didn't expect a def was a terminator instruction, and inserting instructions after these terminators resulted in malformed IR.
This patch fixes this problem by handling invoke instructions as a special case. If the def is an invoke instruction, the store will be inserted at the beginning of the normal destination block. Since return value from invoke instruction does not dominate the unwind destination block, no action is needed there.
Patch by: Chen Li
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7923
llvm-svn: 231183
The assertion was just checking a class invariant that's pretty easy to
verify by inspection (no mutating operations, and the two non-copy ctors
already ensure the state is maintained) so remove the explicit copy ctor
in favor of the default, thus allowing the use of the default copy
assignment operator without hitting the C++11 deprecation here.
llvm-svn: 231143
Accidentally committed a few more of these cleanup changes than
intended. Still breaking these out & tidying them up.
This reverts commit r231135.
llvm-svn: 231136
There doesn't seem to be any need to assert that iterator assignment is
between iterators over the same node - if you want to reuse an iterator
variable to iterate another node, that's perfectly acceptable. Just
don't mix comparisons between iterators into disjoint sequences, as
usual.
llvm-svn: 231135
It turns out the naming of inserted phis and selects is sensative to the order in which two sets are iterated. We need to nail this down to avoid non-deterministic output and possible test failures.
The modified test is the one I first noticed something odd in. The change is making it more strict to report the error. With the test change, but without the code change, the test fails roughly 1 in 5. With the code change, I've run ~30 runs without error.
Long term, the right fix here is to adjust the naming scheme. I'm checking in this hack to avoid any possible non-determinism in the tests over the weekend. HJust because I only noticed one case doesn't mean it's actually the only case. I hope to get to the right change Monday.
std->llvm data structure changes bugfix change #3
llvm-svn: 230835
Inserting into a DenseMap you're iterating over is not well defined. This is unfortunate since this is well defined on a std::map.
"cleanup per llvm code style standards" bug #2
llvm-svn: 230827
These tests cover the 'base object' identification and rewritting portion of RewriteStatepointsForGC. These aren't completely exhaustive, but they've proven to be reasonable effective over time at finding regressions.
In the process of porting these tests over, I found my first "cleanup per llvm code style standards" bug. We were relying on the order of iteration when testing the base pointers found for a derived pointer. When we switched from std::set to DenseSet, this stopped being a safe assumption. I'm suspecting I'm going to find more of those. In particular, I'm now really wondering about the main iteration loop for this algorithm. I need to go take a closer look at the assumptions there.
I'm not really happy with the fact these are testing what is essentially debug output (i.e. enabled via command line flags). Suggestions for how to structure this better are very welcome.
llvm-svn: 230818
This should be the last cleanup on non-llvm preferred data structures. I left one use of std::set in an assertion; DenseSet didn't seem to have a tombstone for CallSite defined. That might be worth fixing, but wasn't worth it for a debug only use.
llvm-svn: 230084
I'd done the work of extracting the typedef in a previous commit, but didn't actually change it. Hopefully this will make any subtle changes easier to isolate.
llvm-svn: 230081
The notion of a range of inserted safepoint related code is no longer really applicable. This survived over from an earlier implementation. Just saving the inserted gc.statepoint and working from that is far clearer given the current code structure. Particularly when invokable statepoints get involved.
llvm-svn: 230063
When doing style cleanup, I noticed a minor bug in this code. If we have a pointer that we think is unused after a statepoint and thus doesn't need relocation, we store a null pointer into the alloca we're about to promote. This helps turn a mistake in liveness analysis into an easily debuggable crash. It turned out this code had never been updated to handle invoke statepoints.
There's no test for this. Without a bug in liveness, it appears impossible to make this trigger in a way which is visible in the resulting IR. We might store the null, but when promoting the alloca, there will be no uses and thus nothing to test against. Suggestions on how to test are very welcome.
llvm-svn: 230047
Starting to update variable naming and types to match LLVM style. This will be an incremental process to minimize the chance of breakage as I work. Step one, rename member variables to LLVM CamelCase and use llvm's ADT. Much more to come.
llvm-svn: 230042
Before calling Function::getGC to test for enablement, we need to make sure there's actually a GC at all via Function::hasGC. Otherwise, we'd crash on functions without a GC. Thankfully, this only mattered if you manually scheduled the pass, but still, oops. :(
llvm-svn: 230040
When back merging the changes in 229945 I noticed that I forgot to mark the test cases with the appropriate GC. We want the rewriting to be off by default (even when manually added to the pass order), not on-by default. To keep the current test working, mark them as using the statepoint-example GC and whitelist that GC.
Longer term, we need a better selection mechanism here for both actual usage and testing. As I migrate more tests to the in tree version of this pass, I will probably need to update the enable/disable logic as well.
llvm-svn: 229954
This patch consists of a single pass whose only purpose is to visit previous inserted gc.statepoints which do not have gc.relocates inserted yet, and insert them. This can be used either immediately after IR generation to perform 'early safepoint insertion' or late in the pass order to perform 'late insertion'.
This patch is setting the stage for work to continue in tree. In particular, there are known naming and style violations in the current patch. I'll try to get those resolved over the next week or so. As I touch each area to make style changes, I need to make sure we have adequate testing in place. As part of the cleanup, I will be cleaning up a collection of test cases we have out of tree and submitting them upstream. The tests included in this change are very basic and mostly to provide examples of usage.
The pass has several main subproblems it needs to address:
- First, it has identify any live pointers. In the current code, the use of address spaces to distinguish pointers to GC managed objects is hard coded, but this will become parametrizable in the near future. Note that the current change doesn't actually contain a useful liveness analysis. It was seperated into a followup change as the code wasn't ready to be shared. Instead, the current implementation just considers any dominating def of appropriate pointer type to be live.
- Second, it has to identify base pointers for each live pointer. This is a fairly straight forward data flow algorithm.
- Third, the information in the previous steps is used to actually introduce rewrites. Rather than trying to do this by hand, we simply re-purpose the code behind Mem2Reg to do this for us.
llvm-svn: 229945
