The main issue here is that the "thumb" flag wasn't set for some of these
sections, making MSVC's link.exe fails to correctly relocate code
against the symbols inside these sections. link.exe could fail for
instance with the "fixup is not aligned for target 'XX'" error. If
linking doesn't fail, the relocation process goes wrong in the end and
invalid code is generated by the linker.
This patch adds Thumb/ARM information so that the right flags are set
on COFF/Windows.
Patch by Adrien Guinet.
llvm-svn: 273880
It did not handle correctly cases without GEP.
The following loop wasn't vectorized:
for (int i=0; i<len; i++)
*to++ = *from++;
I use getPtrStride() to find Stride for memory access and return 0 is the Stride is not 1 or -1.
Re-commit rL273257 - revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20789
llvm-svn: 273864
This is a follow-up for r273544.
The end goal is to get rid of the isSwift / isCortexXY / isWhatever methods.
Since the ARM backend seems to have quite a lot of calls to these methods, I
intend to submit 5-6 subtarget features at a time, instead of one big lump.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21685
llvm-svn: 273853
Summary: Actually the list of cached files is sorted by file size, not by last accessed time. Also remove unused file access time param for a helper function.
Reviewers: joker-eph, chandlerc, davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21639
llvm-svn: 273852
AVX1 can only broadcast vectors as floats/doubles, so for 256-bit vectors we insert bitcasts if we are shuffling v8i32/v4i64 types. Unfortunately the presence of these bitcasts prevents the current broadcast lowering code from peeking through cases where we have concatenated / extracted vectors to create the 256-bit vectors.
This patch allows us to peek through bitcasts as long as the number of elements doesn't change (i.e. element bitwidth is the same) so the broadcast index is not affected.
Note this bitcast peek is different from the stage later on which doesn't care about the type and is just trying to find a load node.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21660
llvm-svn: 273848
Summary:
This is a straightforward extension of what LoopUnswitch does to
branches to guards. That is, we unswitch
```
for (;;) {
...
guard(loop_invariant_cond);
...
}
```
into
```
if (loop_invariant_cond) {
for (;;) {
...
// There is no need to emit guard(true)
...
}
} else {
for (;;) {
...
guard(false);
// SimplifyCFG will clean this up by adding an
// unreachable after the guard(false)
...
}
}
```
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21725
llvm-svn: 273801
