This new library will be linked in when using the "all-targets"
component and contains the LLVMInitializeAll* functions.
This means that those functions will exist as real symbols in
the shared library, and can therefore can be called from
bindings that are using ffi the shared library.
llvm-svn: 192690
There doesn't seem to be a need in checking if a directory exists if we
will just rm -rf it once we affirm that it does. Instead, just blindly
try to delete it.
This fixes PR17541.
llvm-svn: 192679
rdar:15221834 False AVX register dependencies cause 5x slowdown on
flops-5/6 and significant slowdown on several others.
This was blocking the switch to MI-Sched.
llvm-svn: 192669
through bitcast, ptrtoint, and inttoptr instructions. This is valid
only if the related instructions are in that same basic block, otherwise
we may reference variables that were not live accross basic blocks
resulting in undefined virtual registers.
The bug was exposed when both SDISel and FastISel were used within the same
function, i.e., one basic block is issued with FastISel and another with SDISel,
as demonstrated with the testcase.
<rdar://problem/15192473>
llvm-svn: 192636
This pass is needed to break false dependencies. Without it, unlucky
register assignment can result in wild (5x) swings in
performance. This pass was trying to handle AVX but not getting it
right. AVX doesn't have partial register defs, it has unused register
reads in which the high bits of a source operand are copied into the
unused bits of the dest.
Fixing this requires conservative liveness analysis. This is awkard
because the pass already has its own pseudo-liveness. However, proper
liveness is expensive, and we would like to use a generic utility to
compute it. The fix only invokes liveness on-demand. It is rare to
detect a case that needs undef-read dependence breaking, but when it
happens, it can be needed many times within a very large block.
I think the existing heuristic which uses a register window of 16 is
too conservative for loop-carried false dependencies. If the loop is a
reduction. The out-of-order engine may be able to execute several loop
iterations in parallel. However, I'll leave this tuning exercise for
next time.
llvm-svn: 192635
a) x86-64 TLS has been documented
b) the code path should use movq for the correct relocation
to be generated.
I've also added a fixme for the test case that we should improve
the code generated, it should look something like is documented
in the tls abi document.
llvm-svn: 192631
Clobbering is exclusive not inclusive on register units.
For liveness, we need to consider all the preserved registers.
e.g. A regmask that clobbers YMM0 may preserve XMM0.
Units are only clobbered when all super-registers are clobbered.
llvm-svn: 192623
Some clients may add block live ins and may track liveness over a
large scope. This guarantees an efficient implementation in all cases
with no memory allocation/deallocation, independent of the number of
target registers. It could be slightly less convenient but is fine in
the expected case.
llvm-svn: 192622
Clean up creation of static member DIEs. We can create static member DIEs from
two places, so we call getOrCreateStaticMemberDIE from the two places.
getOrCreateStaticMemberDIE will get or create the context DIE first, then it
will check if the DIE already exists, if not, we create the static member DIE
and add it to the context.
Creation of static member DIEs are handled in a similar way as subprogram DIEs.
llvm-svn: 192618
Per original comment, the intention of this loop
is to go ahead and break the critical edge
(in order to sink this instruction) if there's
reason to believe doing so might "unblock" the
sinking of additional instructions that define
registers used by this one. The idea is that if
we have a few instructions to sink "together"
breaking the edge might be worthwhile.
This commit makes a few small changes
to help better realize this goal:
First, modify the loop to ignore registers
defined by this instruction. We don't
sink definitions of physical registers,
and sinking an SSA definition isn't
going to unblock an upstream instruction.
Second, ignore uses of physical registers.
Instructions that define physical registers are
rejected for sinking, and so moving this one
won't enable moving any defining instructions.
As an added bonus, while virtual register
use-def chains are generally small due
to SSA goodness, iteration over the uses
and definitions (used by hasOneNonDBGUse)
for physical registers like EFLAGS
can be rather expensive in practice.
(This is the original reason for looking at this)
Finally, to keep things simple continue
to only consider this trick for registers that
have a single use (via hasOneNonDBGUse),
but to avoid spuriously breaking critical edges
only do so if the definition resides
in the same MBB and therefore this one directly
blocks it from being sunk as well.
If sinking them together is meant to be,
let the iterative nature of this pass
sink the definition into this block first.
Update tests to accomodate this change,
add new testcase where sinking avoids pipeline stalls.
llvm-svn: 192608
Currently MSan checks that arguments of *cvt* intrinsics are fully initialized.
That's too much to ask: some of them only operate on lower half, or even
quarter, of the input register.
llvm-svn: 192599
INSERT is the first type of MSA instruction that requires a change to the way
MSA registers are parsed. This happens because MSA registers may be suffixed by
an index in the form of an immediate or a general purpose register. The changes
to parseMSARegs reflect that requirement.
llvm-svn: 192582
