Instead encode llvm IR level property "HasSideEffects" in an operand (shared
with IsAlignStack). Added MachineInstrs::hasUnmodeledSideEffects() to check
the operand when the instruction is an INLINEASM.
This allows memory instructions to be moved around INLINEASM instructions.
llvm-svn: 123044
alternative register allocator that does not require LiveIntervals by specifying
it on the command-line for a target that has StrongPHIElimination enabled by
default.
These checks are pretty meaningless anyways, since StrongPHIElimination and
PHIElimination are never used at the same time.
llvm-svn: 122176
regB = move RCX
regA = op regB, regC
RAX = move regA
where both regB and regC are killed. If regB is constrainted to non-compatible
physical registers but regC is not constrainted at all, then it's better to
commute the instruction.
movl %edi, %eax
shlq $32, %rcx
leaq (%rcx,%rax), %rax
=>
movl %edi, %eax
shlq $32, %rcx
orq %rcx, %rax
rdar://8762995
llvm-svn: 121793
must be called in the pass's constructor. This function uses static dependency declarations to recursively initialize
the pass's dependencies.
Clients that only create passes through the createFooPass() APIs will require no changes. Clients that want to use the
CommandLine options for passes will need to manually call the appropriate initialization functions in PassInitialization.h
before parsing commandline arguments.
I have tested this with all standard configurations of clang and llvm-gcc on Darwin. It is possible that there are problems
with the static dependencies that will only be visible with non-standard options. If you encounter any crash in pass
registration/creation, please send the testcase to me directly.
llvm-svn: 116820
perform initialization without static constructors AND without explicit initialization
by the client. For the moment, passes are required to initialize both their
(potential) dependencies and any passes they preserve. I hope to be able to relax
the latter requirement in the future.
llvm-svn: 116334
If we are emitting COPY instructions for the REG_SEQUENCE, make sure the kill
flag goes on the last COPY. Otherwise we may be using a killed register.
<rdar://problem/8287792>
llvm-svn: 110589
ScheduleDAGEmit, TwoAddressLowering, and PHIElimination.
This switches the bulk of register copies to using COPY, but many less used
copyRegToReg calls remain.
llvm-svn: 108050
EXTRACT_SUBREG no longer appears as a machine instruction. Use COPY instead.
Add isCopy() checks in many places using isMoveInstr() and isExtractSubreg().
The isMoveInstr hook will be removed later.
llvm-svn: 107879
INSERT_SUBREG will now only appear in SSA machine instructions.
Fix the handling of partial redefs in ProcessImplicitDefs. This is now relevant
since partial redef COPY instructions appear.
llvm-svn: 107726
- X86 unfolding should check if the instructions being unfolded has memoperands.
If there is no memoperands, then it must assume conservative alignment. If this
would introduce an expensive sse unaligned load / store, then unfoldMemoryOperand
etc. should not unfold the instruction.
llvm-svn: 107509
opportunities. For example, this lets it emit this:
movq (%rax), %rcx
addq %rdx, %rcx
instead of this:
movq %rdx, %rcx
addq (%rax), %rcx
in the case where %rdx has subsequent uses. It's the same number
of instructions, and usually the same encoding size on x86, but
it appears faster, and in general, it may allow better scheduling
for the load.
llvm-svn: 106493
combined to an insert_subreg, i.e., where the destination register is larger
than the source. We need to check that the subregs can be composed for that
case in a symmetrical way to the case when the destination is smaller.
llvm-svn: 106004
replacing the overly conservative checks that I had introduced recently to
deal with correctness issues. This makes a pretty noticable difference
in our testcases where reg_sequences are used. I've updated one test to
check that we no longer emit the unnecessary subreg moves.
llvm-svn: 105991
Check that all the instructions are in the same basic block, that the
EXTRACT_SUBREGs write to the same subregs that are being extracted, and that
the source and destination registers are in the same regclass. Some of
these constraints can be relaxed with a bit more work. Jakob suggested
that the loop that checks for subregs when NewSubIdx != 0 should use the
"nodbg" iterator, so I made that change here, too.
llvm-svn: 105437
instruction defines subregisters.
Any existing subreg indices on the original instruction are preserved or
composed with the new subreg index.
Also substitute multiple operands mentioning the original register by using the
new MachineInstr::substituteRegister() function. This is necessary because there
will soon be <imp-def> operands added to non read-modify-write partial
definitions. This instruction:
%reg1234:foo = FLAP %reg1234<imp-def>
will reMaterialize(%reg3333, bar) like this:
%reg3333:bar-foo = FLAP %reg333:bar<imp-def>
Finally, replace the TargetRegisterInfo pointer argument with a reference to
indicate that it cannot be NULL.
llvm-svn: 105358
that are aliases of the specified register.
- Rename modifiesRegister to definesRegister since it's looking a def of the
specific register or one of its super-registers. It's not looking for def of a
sub-register or alias that could change the specified register.
- Added modifiesRegister to look for defs of aliases.
llvm-svn: 104377
instructions.
e.g.
%reg1026<def> = VLDMQ %reg1025<kill>, 260, pred:14, pred:%reg0
%reg1027<def> = EXTRACT_SUBREG %reg1026, 6
%reg1028<def> = EXTRACT_SUBREG %reg1026<kill>, 5
...
%reg1029<def> = REG_SEQUENCE %reg1028<kill>, 5, %reg1027<kill>, 6, %reg1028, 7, %reg1027, 8, %reg1028, 9, %reg1027, 10, %reg1030<kill>, 11, %reg1032<kill>, 12
After REG_SEQUENCE is eliminated, we are left with:
%reg1026<def> = VLDMQ %reg1025<kill>, 260, pred:14, pred:%reg0
%reg1029:6<def> = EXTRACT_SUBREG %reg1026, 6
%reg1029:5<def> = EXTRACT_SUBREG %reg1026<kill>, 5
The regular coalescer will not be able to coalesce reg1026 and reg1029 because it doesn't
know how to combine sub-register indices 5 and 6. Now 2-address pass will consult the
target whether sub-registers 5 and 6 of reg1026 can be combined to into a larger
sub-register (or combined to be reg1026 itself as is the case here). If it is possible,
it will be able to replace references of reg1026 with reg1029 + the larger sub-register
index.
llvm-svn: 103835
