When a live range splits into multiple connected components, we would
arbitrarily assign <undef> uses to component 0. This is wrong when the
use is tied to a def that gets assigned to a different component:
%vreg69<def> = ADD8ri %vreg68<undef>, 1
The use and def must get the same virtual register.
Fix this by assigning <undef> uses to the same component as the value
defined by the instruction, if any:
%vreg69<def> = ADD8ri %vreg69<undef>, 1
This fixes PR13402. The PR has a test case which I am not including
because it is unlikely to keep exposing this behavior in the future.
llvm-svn: 160739
of an array element (rather than at the beginning of the element) and extended
into the next element, then the load from the second element was being handled
wrong due to incorrect updating of the notion of which byte to load next. This
fixes PR13442. Thanks to Chris Smowton for reporting the problem, analyzing it
and providing a fix.
llvm-svn: 160711
The long branch pass (fixed in r160601) no longer uses the global base register
to compute addresses of branch destinations, so it is not necessary to reserve
a slot on the stack.
llvm-svn: 160703
struct s {
double x1;
float x2;
};
__attribute__((regparm(3))) struct s f(int a, int b, int c);
void g(void) {
f(41, 42, 43);
}
We need to be able to represent passing the address of s to f (sret) in a
register (inreg). Turns out that all that is needed is to not mark them as
mutually incompatible.
llvm-svn: 160695
if Condition Is Met instuctions that was not correctly determining the target
instruction.
So for a jne rel32 instruction:
% cat x.s
.byte 0x0f, 0x85, 0x09, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00
% as x.s
it was incorrectly deterining the target:
% otool -q -tv a.out
a.out:
(__TEXT,__text) section
0000000000000000 jne 0xd
and with the fix it gets this correct as:
% otool -q -tv a.out
a.out:
(__TEXT,__text) section
0000000000000000 jne 0xf
rdar://11505997
llvm-svn: 160694
are targeting an ELF platform. Only fold gs-relative (and fs-relative) loads
if it is actually sensible to do so for the target platform.
This fixes PR13438.
llvm-svn: 160687
might be deliberate "one time" leaks, so that leak checkers can find them.
This is a reapply of r160602 with the fix that this time I'm committing the
code I thought I was committing last time; the I->eraseFromParent() goes
*after* the break out of the loop.
llvm-svn: 160664
r160529 that was subsequently reverted. The fix was to not call
GV->eraseFromParent() right before the caller does the same. The existing
testcases already caught this bug if run under valgrind.
llvm-svn: 160602
This pass no longer requires that the global pointer value be saved to the
stack or register since it uses bal instruction to compute branch distance.
llvm-svn: 160601
