Add regression tests for the following transformation:
ldr X, [x20]
...
add x20, x20, #32
->
ldr X, [x20], #32
with X being either w0, x0, s0, d0 or q0.
llvm-svn: 209711
Use more straightforward way to represent the set of instruction
ranges where the location of a user variable is defined - vector of pairs
of instructions (defining start/end of each range),
instead of a flattened vector of instructions where some instructions
are supposed to start the range, and the rest are supposed to "clobber" it.
Simplify the code which generates actual .debug_loc entries.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 209698
This is a corner case I have stumbled upon when dealing with ARM64 type
conversions. I was not able to extract a testcase for the community codebase to
fail on. The patch conservatively discards a division that would have ended up
in an ICE due to a type mismatch when building a multiply expression. I have
also added code to a place that builds add expressions and in which we should be
careful not to pass in operands of different types.
llvm-svn: 209694
We do not need to compute the GCD anymore after we removed the constant
coefficients from the terms: the terms are now all parametric expressions and
there is no need to recognize constant terms that divide only a subset of the
terms. We only rely on the size of the terms, i.e., the number of operands in
the multiply expressions, to sort the terms and recognize the parametric
dimensions.
llvm-svn: 209693
No functional change is intended: instead of relying on the delinearization to
come up with the base pointer as a remainder of the divisions in the
delinearization, we just compute it from the array access and use that value.
We substract the base pointer from the SCEV to be delinearized and that
simplifies the work of the delinearizer.
llvm-svn: 209692
The delinearization is needed only to remove the non linearity induced by
expressions involving multiplications of parameters and induction variables.
There is no problem in dealing with constant times parameters, or constant times
an induction variable.
For this reason, the current patch discards all constant terms and multipliers
before running the delinearization algorithm on the terms. The only thing
remaining in the term expressions are parameters and multiply expressions of
parameters: these simplified term expressions are passed to the array shape
recognizer that will not recognize constant dimensions anymore: these will be
recognized as different strides in parametric subscripts.
The only important special case of a constant dimension is the size of elements.
Instead of relying on the delinearization to infer the size of an element,
compute the element size from the base address type. This is a much more precise
way of computing the element size than before, as we would have mixed together
the size of an element with the strides of the innermost dimension.
llvm-svn: 209691
Current implementation of calculateDbgValueHistory already creates the
keys in the expected order (user variables are listed in order of appearance),
and should do so later by contract.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 209690
I'm not sure exactly where/how we end up with an abstract DbgVariable
with a null DIE, but we do... looking into it & will add a test and/or
fix when I figure it out.
Currently shows up in selfhost or compiler-rt builds.
llvm-svn: 209683
%higher and %highest can have non-zero values only for offsets greater
than 2GB, which is highly unlikely, if not impossible when compiling a
single function. This makes long branch for MIPS64 3 instructions smaller.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3281.diff
llvm-svn: 209678
After much puppetry, here's the major piece of the work to ensure that
even when a concrete definition preceeds all inline definitions, an
abstract definition is still created and referenced from both concrete
and inline definitions.
Variables are still broken in this case (see comment in
dbg-value-inlined-parameter.ll test case) and will be addressed in
follow up work.
llvm-svn: 209677
A further step to correctly emitting concrete out of line definitions
preceeding inlined instances of the same program.
To do this, emission of subprograms must be delayed until required since
we don't know which (abstract only (if there's no out of line
definition), concrete only (if there are no inlined instances), or both)
DIEs are required at the start of the module.
To reduce the test churn in the following commit that actually fixes the
bug, this commit introduces the lazy DIE construction and cleans up test
cases that are impacted by the changes in the resulting DIE ordering.
llvm-svn: 209675
This is a precursor to fixing inlined debug info where the concrete,
out-of-line definition may preceed any inlined usage. To cope with this,
the attributes that may appear on the concrete definition or the
abstract definition are delayed until the end of the module. Then, if an
abstract definition was created, it is referenced (and no other
attributes are added to the out-of-line definition), otherwise the
attributes are added directly to the out-of-line definition.
In a couple of cases this causes not just reordering of attributes, but
reordering of types. When the creation of the attribute is delayed, if
that creation would create a type (such as for a DW_AT_type attribute)
then other top level DIEs may've been constructed during the delay,
causing the referenced type to be created and added after those
intervening DIEs. In the extreme case, in cross-cu-inlining.ll, this
actually causes the DW_TAG_basic_type for "int" to move from one CU to
another.
llvm-svn: 209674
This is an enhancement to SeparateConstOffsetFromGEP. With this patch, we can
extract a constant offset from "s/zext and/or/xor A, B".
Added a new test @ext_or to verify this enhancement.
Refactoring the code, I also extracted some common logic to function
Distributable.
llvm-svn: 209670
This old test didn't have the argument numbering that's now squirelled
away in the high bits of the line number in the DW_TAG_arg_variable
metadata.
Add the numbering and update the test to ensure arguments are in-order.
llvm-svn: 209669
Detected by Daniel Jasper, Ilia Filippov, and Andrea Di Biagio
Fixed the argument order to select (the mask semantics to blendv* are the
inverse of select) and fixed the tests
Added parenthesis to the assert condition
Ran clang-format
llvm-svn: 209667
In PPCISelLowering.cpp: PPCTargetLowering::LowerBUILD_VECTOR(), there
is an optimization for certain patterns to generate one or two vector
splats followed by a vector add or subtract. This operation is
represented by a VADD_SPLAT in the selection DAG. Prior to this
patch, it was possible for the VADD_SPLAT to be assigned the wrong
data type, causing incorrect code generation. This patch corrects the
problem.
Specifically, the code previously assigned the value type of the
BUILD_VECTOR node to the newly generated VADD_SPLAT node. This is
correct much of the time, but not always. The problem is that the
call to isConstantSplat() may return a SplatBitSize that is not the
same as the number of bits in the original element vector type. The
correct type to assign is a vector type with the same element bit size
as SplatBitSize.
The included test case shows an example of this, where the
BUILD_VECTOR node has a type of v16i8. The vector to be built is {0,
16, 0, 16, 0, 16, 0, 16, 0, 16, 0, 16, 0, 16, 0, 16}. isConstantSplat
detects that we can generate a splat of 16 for type v8i16, which is
the type we must assign to the VADD_SPLAT node. If we do not, we
generate a vspltisb of 8 and a vaddubm, which generates the incorrect
result {16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16,
16}. The correct code generation is a vspltish of 8 and a vadduhm.
This patch also corrected code generation for
CodeGen/PowerPC/2008-07-10-SplatMiscompile.ll, which had been marked
as an XFAIL, so we can remove the XFAIL from the test case.
llvm-svn: 209662
A test in test/Generic creates a DAG where the NZCV output of an ADCS is used
by multiple nodes. This makes LLVM want to save a copy of NZCV for later, which
it couldn't do before.
This should be the last fix required for the aarch64 buildbot.
llvm-svn: 209651
Cortex-M4 only has single-precision floating point support, so any LLVM
"double" type will have been split into 2 i32s by now. Fortunately, the
consecutive-register framework turns out to be precisely what's needed to
reconstruct the double and follow AAPCS-VFP correctly!
rdar://problem/17012966
llvm-svn: 209650
These are tested by test/CodeGen/Generic, so we should probably know
how to deal with them. Fortunately generic code does it if asked.
llvm-svn: 209646
Summary:
Implemented an InstCombine transformation that takes a blendv* intrinsic
call and translates it into an IR select, if the mask is constant.
This will eventually get lowered into blends with immediates if possible,
or pblendvb (with an option to further optimize if we can transform the
pblendvb into a blend+immediate instruction, depending on the selector).
It will also enable optimizations by the IR passes, which give up on
sight of the intrinsic.
Both the transformation and the lowering of its result to asm got shiny
new tests.
The transformation is a bit convoluted because of blendvp[sd]'s
definition:
Its mask is a floating point value! This forces us to convert it and get
the highest bit. I suppose this happened because the mask has type
__m128 in Intel's intrinsic and v4sf (for blendps) in gcc's builtin.
I will send an email to llvm-dev to discuss if we want to change this or
not.
Reviewers: grosbach, delena, nadav
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3859
llvm-svn: 209643
This commit is debatable. There are two possible approaches, neither
of which is really satisfactory:
1. Use "@foo(i1 zeroext)" to mean an extension to 32-bits on Darwin,
and 8 bits otherwise.
2. Redefine "@foo(i1)" to mean that the i1 is extended by the caller
to 8 bits. This goes against the spirit of "zeroext" I think, but
it's a bit of a vague construct anyway (by definition you're going
to extend to the amount required by the ABI, that's why it's the
ABI!).
This implements option 2. The DAG machinery really isn't setup for the
first (there's a fairly strong assumption that "zeroext" goes to at
least the smallest register size), and even if it was the resulting
DAG looks like it would be inferior in many cases.
Theoretically we could add AssertZext nodes in the consumers of
ABI-passed values too now, but this actually seems to make the code
worse in practice by making truncation proceed in two steps. The code
produced is equally valid if we continue to assume only the low bit is
defined.
Should fix PR19850
llvm-svn: 209637
We can eliminate the custom C++ code in favour of some TableGen to
check the same things. Functionality should be identical, except for a
buffer overrun that was present in the C++ code and meant webkit
failed if any small argument needed to be passed on the stack.
llvm-svn: 209636
Add tests for the following transform:
str X, [x0, #32]
...
add x0, x0, #32
->
str X, [x0, #32]!
with X being either w1, x1, s0, d0 or q0.
llvm-svn: 209627
We have a couple of regression tests for load/store pairing, but (to my knowledge) there are no regression tests for the load/store + add/sub folding.
As a first step towards increased test coverage of this area, this commit adds a test for one instance of a load + add to pre-indexed load transformation.
llvm-svn: 209618
and via the command line, mirroring similar functionality in LoopUnroll. In
situations where clients used custom unrolling thresholds, their intent could
previously be foiled by LoopRotate having a hardcoded threshold.
llvm-svn: 209617
This was previously regressed/broken by r192749 (reverted due to this
issue in r192938) and I was about to break it again by accident with
some more invasive changes that deal with the subprogram lists. So to
avoid that and further issues - here's a test.
It's a pretty basic test - in both r192749 and my impending case, this
test would crash, but checking the basics (that we put a subprogram in
just one of the two CUs) seems like a good start.
We still get this wrong in weird ways if the linkonce-odr function
happens to not be identical in the metadata (because it's defined in two
different files (hence the # line directives in this test), etc) even
though it meets the language requirements (identical token stream) for
such a thing. That results in two subprogram DIEs, but only one of them
gets the parameter and high/low pc information, etc. We probably need to
use the DIRef infrastructure to deduplicate functions as we do types to
address this issue - or perhaps teach the BC linker to remove the
duplicate entries in subprogram lists?
llvm-svn: 209614
