We normally don't drop functions from the C API's, but in this case I think we
can:
* The old implementation of getFileOffset was fairly broken
* The introduction of LLVMGetSymbolFileOffset was itself a C api breaking
change as it removed LLVMGetSymbolOffset.
* It is an incredibly specialized use case. The only reason MCJIT needs it is
because of its odd position of being a dynamic linker of .o files.
llvm-svn: 206750
Some targets require more than one relocation entry to perform a relocation.
This change allows processRelocationRef to process more than one relocation
entry at a time by passing the relocation iterator itself instead of just
the relocation entry.
Related to <rdar://problem/16199095>
llvm-svn: 204439
RTDyldMemoryManager, regardless of whether it thinks they're "required for
execution".
Currently, RuntimeDyld only passes sections that are "required for execution"
to the RTDyldMemoryManager, and takes "required for execution" to mean exactly
"contains symbols or relocations". There are two problems with this:
(1) It can drop sections with anonymous data that is referenced by code.
(2) It leaves the JIT client no way to inspect interesting sections that aren't
actually required to run the program (e.g dwarf sections).
A test case is still in the works.
Future work: We may want to replace this with a generic section filtering
mechanism, but that will require more consideration. For now, this flag at least
allows clients to volunteer to do the filtering themselves.
Fixes <rdar://problem/15177691>.
llvm-svn: 204398
relevant subclasses of RuntimeDyldImpl. This allows construction of
RuntimeDyldImpl instances to be deferred until after the target architecture is
known.
llvm-svn: 203352
This compiles with no changes to clang/lld/lldb with MSVC and includes
overloads to various functions which are used by those projects and llvm
which have OwningPtr's as parameters. This should allow out of tree
projects some time to move. There are also no changes to libs/Target,
which should help out of tree targets have time to move, if necessary.
llvm-svn: 203083
required for all sections in a module. This can be useful when targets or
code-models place strict requirements on how sections must be laid out
in memory.
If RTDyldMemoryManger::needsToReserveAllocationSpace() is overridden to return
true then the JIT will call the following method on the memory manager, which
can be used to preallocate the necessary memory.
void RTDyldMemoryManager::reserveAllocationSpace(uintptr_t CodeSize,
uintptr_t DataSizeRO,
uintptr_t DataSizeRW)
Patch by Vaidas Gasiunas. Thanks very much Viadas!
llvm-svn: 201259
uintptr_t. An unsigned could overflow for large sections.
No test case - anything big enough to overflow an unsigned is going to take an
appreciable time to zero when the test passes.
The choice of uintptr_t was made to match the RTDyldMemoryManager APIs, but
these should probably be hardcoded to uint64_ts: It is legitimate to JIT for
64-bit targets from a 32-bit host/compiler.
llvm-svn: 201127
None of the object file formats reported error on iterator increment. In
retrospect, that is not too surprising: no object format stores symbols or
sections in a linked list or other structure that requires chasing pointers.
As a consequence, all error checking can be done on begin() and end().
This reduces the text segment of bin/llvm-readobj in my machine from 521233 to
518526 bytes.
llvm-svn: 200442
I believe the bot failures on linux systems were due to overestimating the
alignment of object-files within archives, which are only guaranteed to be
two-byte aligned. I have reduced the alignment in
RuntimeDyldELF::createObjectImageFromFile accordingly.
llvm-svn: 198737
subsequent changes are easier to review. About to fix some layering
issues, and wanted to separate out the necessary churn.
Also comment and sink the include of "Windows.h" in three .inc files to
match the usage in Memory.inc.
llvm-svn: 198685
This patch removes most of the trivial cases of weak vtables by pinning them to
a single object file. The memory leaks in this version have been fixed. Thanks
Alexey for pointing them out.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2068
Reviewed by Andy
llvm-svn: 195064
This change is incorrect. If you delete virtual destructor of both a base class
and a subclass, then the following code:
Base *foo = new Child();
delete foo;
will not cause the destructor for members of Child class. As a result, I observe
plently of memory leaks. Notable examples I investigated are:
ObjectBuffer and ObjectBufferStream, AttributeImpl and StringSAttributeImpl.
llvm-svn: 194997
This patch removes most of the trivial cases of weak vtables by pinning them to
a single object file.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2068
Reviewed by Andy
llvm-svn: 194865
Some background: One can pass compiled resource files (.res files) directly
to the linker on Windows. If a resource file is given, the linker will run
"cvtres" command in background to convert the resource file to a COFF file
to link it.
What I'm trying to do with this patch is to make the linker to recognize
the resource file by file magic, so that it can run cvtres command.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1943
llvm-svn: 192742
It's useful for the memory managers that are allocating a section to know what the name of the section is.
At a minimum, this is useful for low-level debugging - it's customary for JITs to be able to tell you what
memory they allocated, and as part of any such dump, they should be able to tell you some meta-data about
what each allocation is for. This allows clients that supply their own memory managers to do this.
Additionally, we also envision the SectionName being useful for passing meta-data from within LLVM to an LLVM
client.
This changes both the C and C++ APIs, and all of the clients of those APIs within LLVM. I'm assuming that
it's safe to change the C++ API because that API is allowed to change. I'm assuming that it's safe to change
the C API because we haven't shipped the API in a release yet (LLVM 3.3 doesn't include the MCJIT memory
management C API).
llvm-svn: 191804
Tests to follow.
PIC with small code model and EH frame handling will not work with multiple modules. There are also some rough edges to be smoothed out for remote target support.
llvm-svn: 191722
This patch provides basic support for powerpc64le as an LLVM target.
However, use of this target will not actually generate little-endian
code. Instead, use of the target will cause the correct little-endian
built-in defines to be generated, so that code that tests for
__LITTLE_ENDIAN__, for example, will be correctly parsed for
syntax-only testing. Code generation will otherwise be the same as
powerpc64 (big-endian), for now.
The patch leaves open the possibility of creating a little-endian
PowerPC64 back end, but there is no immediate intent to create such a
thing.
The LLVM portions of this patch simply add ppc64le coverage everywhere
that ppc64 coverage currently exists. There is nothing of any import
worth testing until such time as little-endian code generation is
implemented. In the corresponding Clang patch, there is a new test
case variant to ensure that correct built-in defines for little-endian
code are generated.
llvm-svn: 187179
For COFF and MachO, sections semantically have relocations that apply to them.
That is not the case on ELF.
In relocatable objects (.o), a section with relocations in ELF has offsets to
another section where the relocations should be applied.
In dynamic objects and executables, relocations don't have an offset, they have
a virtual address. The section sh_info may or may not point to another section,
but that is not actually used for resolving the relocations.
This patch exposes that in the ObjectFile API. It has the following advantages:
* Most (all?) clients can handle this more efficiently. They will normally walk
all relocations, so doing an effort to iterate in a particular order doesn't
save time.
* llvm-readobj now prints relocations in the same way the native readelf does.
* probably most important, relocations that don't point to any section are now
visible. This is the case of relocations in the rela.dyn section. See the
updated relocation-executable.test for example.
llvm-svn: 182908
libExecutionEngine. Move method implementations that aren't specific to
allocation out of SectionMemoryManager and into RTDyldMemoryManager.
This is in preparation for exposing RTDyldMemoryManager through the C
API.
This is a fixed version of r182407 and r182411. That first revision
broke builds because I forgot to move the conditional includes of
various POSIX headers from SectionMemoryManager into
RTDyldMemoryManager. Those includes are necessary because of how
getPointerToNamedFunction works around the glibc libc_nonshared.a thing.
The latter revision still broke things because I forgot to include
llvm/Config/config.h.
llvm-svn: 182418
libExecutionEngine. Move method implementations that aren't specific to
allocation out of SectionMemoryManager and into RTDyldMemoryManager.
This is in preparation for exposing RTDyldMemoryManager through the C
API.
This is a fixed version of r182407. That revision broke builds because I
forgot to move the conditional includes of various POSIX headers from
SectionMemoryManager into RTDyldMemoryManager. Those includes are
necessary because of how getPointerToNamedFunction works around the
glibc libc_nonshared.a thing.
llvm-svn: 182411
