1. Inform users of ADDEs with two 0 operands that it never sets carry
2. Fold other ADDs or ADDCs into the ADDE if possible
It would be neat if we could do the same thing for SETCC+ADD eventually, but we can't do that in target independent code.
llvm-svn: 126557
is possible to do better if the high bit is set in either KnownZero/KnownOne, but
in practice NumSignBits is always 1 when we are zero extending because nothing
is known about that register.
llvm-svn: 126465
Limit the folding of any_ext and sext into the load operation to scalars.
Limit the active-bits trunc optimization to scalars.
Document vector trunc and vector sext in LangRef.
Similar to commit 126080 (for enabling zext).
llvm-svn: 126424
registers at phis. This enables us to eliminate a lot of pointless zexts during
the DAGCombine phase. This fixes <rdar://problem/8760114>.
llvm-svn: 126380
In other words, do not keep track of argument's location. The debugger (gdb) is not prepared to see line table entries for arguments. For the debugger, "second" line table entry marks beginning of function body.
This requires some coordination with debugger to get this working.
- The debugger needs to be aware of prolog_end attribute attached with line table entries.
- The compiler needs to accurately mark prolog_end in line table entries (at -O0 and at -O1+)
llvm-svn: 126155
The DAGCombiner folds the zext into complex load instructions. This patch
prevents this optimization on vectors since none of the supported targets
knows how to perform load+vector_zext in one instruction.
llvm-svn: 126080
the time but presumably my email got lost). Examples where the previous logic
got it wrong: (1) a signed i8 multiply of 64 by 2 overflows, but the high part is
zero; (2) a signed i8 multiple of -128 by 2 overflows, but the high part is all
ones.
llvm-svn: 125748
transformation if we can't legally create a build vector of the correct
type. Check that we can make the transformation first, and add a TODO to
refactor this code with similar cases.
Fixes: PR9223 and rdar://9000350
llvm-svn: 125631
have their low bits set to zero. This allows us to optimize
out explicit stack alignment code like in stack-align.ll:test4 when
it is redundant.
Doing this causes the code generator to start turning FI+cst into
FI|cst all over the place, which is general goodness (that is the
canonical form) except that various pieces of the code generator
don't handle OR aggressively. Fix this by introducing a new
SelectionDAG::isBaseWithConstantOffset predicate, and using it
in places that are looking for ADD(X,CST). The ARM backend in
particular was missing a lot of addressing mode folding opportunities
around OR.
llvm-svn: 125470
generating i8 shift amounts for things like i1024 types. Add
an assert in getNode to prevent this from occuring in the future,
fix the buggy transformation, revert my previous patch, and
document this gotcha in ISDOpcodes.h
llvm-svn: 125465
The DAGCombiner created illegal BUILD_VECTOR operations.
The patch added a check that either illegal operations are
allowed or that the created operation is legal.
llvm-svn: 125435
The bug happens when the DAGCombiner attempts to optimize one of the patterns
of the SUB opcode. It tries to create a zero of type v2i64. This type is legal
on 32bit machines, but the initializer of this vector (i64) is target dependent.
Currently, the initializer attempts to create an i64 zero constant, which fails.
Added a flag to tell the DAGCombiner to create a legal zero, if we require that
the pass would generate legal types.
llvm-svn: 125391
precisely track pressure on a selection DAG, but we can at least keep
it balanced. This design accounts for various interesting aspects of
selection DAGS: register and subregister copies, glued nodes, dead
nodes, unused registers, etc.
Added SUnit::NumRegDefsLeft and ScheduleDAGSDNodes::RegDefIter.
Note: I disabled PrescheduleNodesWithMultipleUses when register
pressure is enabled, based on no evidence other than I don't think it
makes sense to have both enabled.
llvm-svn: 124853
the load, then it may be legal to transform the load and store to integer
load and store of the same width.
This is done if the target specified the transformation as profitable. e.g.
On arm, this can transform:
vldr.32 s0, []
vstr.32 s0, []
to
ldr r12, []
str r12, []
rdar://8944252
llvm-svn: 124708
This happens all the time when a smul is promoted to a larger type.
On x86-64 we now compile "int test(int x) { return x/10; }" into
movslq %edi, %rax
imulq $1717986919, %rax, %rax
movq %rax, %rcx
shrq $63, %rcx
sarq $34, %rax <- used to be "shrq $32, %rax; sarl $2, %eax"
addl %ecx, %eax
This fires 96 times in gcc.c on x86-64.
llvm-svn: 124559
This happens e.g. for code like "X - X%10" where we lower the modulo operation
to a series of multiplies and shifts that are then subtracted from X, leading to
this missed optimization.
llvm-svn: 124532
