value type, so there is no point in passing it around using
an EVT. Use the simpler MVT everywhere. Rather than trying
to propagate this information maximally in all the code that
using the calling convention stuff, I chose to do a mainly
low impact change instead.
llvm-svn: 118167
1. Fix pre-ra scheduler so it doesn't try to push instructions above calls to
"optimize for latency". Call instructions don't have the right latency and
this is more likely to use introduce spills.
2. Fix if-converter cost function. For ARM, it should use instruction latencies,
not # of micro-ops since multi-latency instructions is completely executed
even when the predicate is false. Also, some instruction will be "slower"
when they are predicated due to the register def becoming implicit input.
rdar://8598427
llvm-svn: 118135
BB#1: derived from LLVM BB %bb.nph28
Live Ins: %AL
Predecessors according to CFG: BB#0
TEST8rr %reg16384<kill>, %reg16384, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR8:%reg16384
JNE_4 <BB#2>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill>
JMP_4 <BB#2>
Successors according to CFG: BB#2 BB#2
These double CFG edges only ever occur in bugpoint-generated code, so there is
no need to attempt something clever.
llvm-svn: 117992
source, and let rewrite() clean it up.
This way, kill flags on the inserted copies are fixed as well during rewrite().
We can't just assume that all the copies we insert are going to be kills since
critical edges into loop headers sometimes require both source and dest to be
live out of a block.
llvm-svn: 117980
At least X86FloatingPoint requires correct kill flags after register allocation,
and targets using register scavenging benefit. Conservative kill flags are not
enough.
llvm-svn: 117960
at more than those which define CPSR. You can have this situation:
(1) subs ...
(2) sub r6, r5, r4
(3) movge ...
(4) cmp r6, 0
(5) movge ...
We cannot convert (2) to "subs" because (3) is using the CPSR set by
(1). There's an analogous situation here:
(1) sub r1, r2, r3
(2) sub r4, r5, r6
(3) cmp r4, ...
(5) movge ...
(6) cmp r1, ...
(7) movge ...
We cannot convert (1) to "subs" because of the intervening use of CPSR.
llvm-svn: 117950
looks like is happening:
Without the peephole optimizer:
(1) sub r6, r6, #32
orr r12, r12, lr, lsl r9
orr r2, r2, r3, lsl r10
(x) cmp r6, #0
ldr r9, LCPI2_10
ldr r10, LCPI2_11
(2) sub r8, r8, #32
(a) movge r12, lr, lsr r6
(y) cmp r8, #0
LPC2_10:
ldr lr, [pc, r10]
(b) movge r2, r3, lsr r8
With the peephole optimizer:
ldr r9, LCPI2_10
ldr r10, LCPI2_11
(1*) subs r6, r6, #32
(2*) subs r8, r8, #32
(a*) movge r12, lr, lsr r6
(b*) movge r2, r3, lsr r8
(1) is used by (x) for the conditional move at (a). (2) is used by (y) for the
conditional move at (b). After the peephole optimizer, these the flags resulting
from (1*) are ignored and only the flags from (2*) are considered for both
conditional moves.
llvm-svn: 117876
operand and one of them has a single use that is a live out copy, favor the
one that is live out. Otherwise it will be difficult to eliminate the copy
if the instruction is a loop induction variable update. e.g.
BB:
sub r1, r3, #1
str r0, [r2, r3]
mov r3, r1
cmp
bne BB
=>
BB:
str r0, [r2, r3]
sub r3, r3, #1
cmp
bne BB
This fixed the recent 256.bzip2 regression.
llvm-svn: 117675
We don't want unused values forming their own equivalence classes, so we lump
them all together in one class, and then merge them with the class of the last
used value.
llvm-svn: 117670
in SSAUpdaterImpl.h
Verifying live intervals revealed that the old method was completely wrong, and
we need an iterative approach to calculating PHI placemant. Fortunately, we have
MachineDominators available, so we don't have to compute that over and over
like SSAUpdaterImpl.h must.
Live-out values are cached between calls to mapValue() and computed in a greedy
way, so most calls will be working with very small block sets.
Thanks to Bob for explaining how this should work.
llvm-svn: 117599
proper SSA updating.
This doesn't cause MachineDominators to be recomputed since we are already
requiring MachineLoopInfo which uses dominators as well.
llvm-svn: 117598
