When LowerExtract eliminates an EXTRACT_SUBREG with a kill flag, it moves the
kill flag to the place where the sub-register is killed. This can accidentally
overlap with the use of a sibling sub-register, and we have trouble.
In the test case we have this code:
Live Ins: %R0 %R1 %R2
%R2L<def> = EXTRACT_SUBREG %R2<kill>, 1
%R2H<def> = LOAD16fi <fi#-1>, 0, Mem:LD(2,4) [FixedStack-1 + 0]
%R1L<def> = EXTRACT_SUBREG %R1<kill>, 1
%R0L<def> = EXTRACT_SUBREG %R0<kill>, 1
%R0H<def> = ADD16 %R2H<kill>, %R2L<kill>, %AZ<imp-def>, %AN<imp-def>, %AC0<imp-def>, %V<imp-def>, %VS<imp-def>
subreg: CONVERTING: %R2L<def> = EXTRACT_SUBREG %R2<kill>, 1
subreg: eliminated!
subreg: killed here: %R0H<def> = ADD16 %R2H, %R2L, %R2<imp-use,kill>, %AZ<imp-def>, %AN<imp-def>, %AC0<imp-def>, %V<imp-def>, %VS<imp-def>
The kill flag on %R2 is moved to the last instruction, and the live range overlaps with the definition of %R2H:
*** Bad machine code: Redefining a live physical register ***
- function: f
- basic block: 0x18358c0 (#0)
- instruction: %R2H<def> = LOAD16fi <fi#-1>, 0, Mem:LD(2,4) [FixedStack-1 + 0]
Register R2H was defined but already live.
The fix is to replace EXTRACT_SUBREG with IMPLICIT_DEF instead of eliminating
it completely:
subreg: CONVERTING: %R2L<def> = EXTRACT_SUBREG %R2<kill>, 1
subreg: replace by: %R2L<def> = IMPLICIT_DEF %R2<kill>
Note that these IMPLICIT_DEF instructions survive to the asm output. It is
necessary to fix the stack-color-with-reg test case because of that.
llvm-svn: 78093
Implicit operands no longer get a free pass: Imp-use requires a live register
and imp-def requires a dead register.
There is also no special rule allowing redefinition of a sub-register when the
super-register is live. The super register must have imp-kill+imp-def operands
instead.
llvm-svn: 78090
killed by another operand.
There is probably a better fix. Either 1) scavenger can look at other operands, or
2) livevariables can be smarter about kill markers. Patches welcome.
llvm-svn: 78072
* Use "svn info" to get last revision in repo, will get matching tarballs
* Now run "svn -q" since "svn info" tells us the revision number
llvm-svn: 78065
TLI.computeMaskedBitsForTargetNode from ComputeMaskedBits, since
the former may call back into the latter. This fixes a major
compile time problem on a testcase that happnened to hit this
in a particularly bad way, PR4643.
llvm-svn: 78023
