This allows the backend to tell the vectorizer to produce inloop
reductions through a TTI hook.
For the moment on ARM under MVE this means allowing integer add
reductions of the correct size. In the future this can include integer
min/max too, under -Os.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75512
When optimising for size, make the cost of i1 logical operations
relatively expensive so that optimisations don't try to combine
predicates.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86525
MVE Gather scatter codegeneration is looking a lot better than it used
to, but still has some issues. The instructions we currently model as 1
cycle per element, which is a bit low for some cases. Increasing the
cost by the MVECostFactor brings them in-line with our other instruction
costs. This will have the effect of only generating then when the extra
benefit is more likely to overcome some of the issues. Notably in
running out of registers and vectorizing loops that could otherwise be
SLP vectorized.
In the short-term whilst we look at other ways of dealing with those
more directly, we can increase the costs of gathers to make them more
likely to be beneficial when created.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86444
If gather/scatters are enabled, ARMTargetTransformInfo now allows
tail predication for loops with a much wider range of strides, up
to anything that is loop invariant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85410
Modify the ARM getCmpSelInstrCost implementation for the code size
costs of selects. Now consider the legalization cost and increase
the cost of i1 because those values wouldn't live in a general purpose
register. We also make selects +1 more expensive to account for the IT
instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82091
As part of D84741, this adds a target hook for the
preferPredicatedReductionSelect option and makes use
of it under MVE, allowing us to tail predicate most
reduction loops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85980
When TTI was updated to use an explicit cost, TCK_CodeSize was used
although the default implicit cost would have been the hand-wavey
cost of size and latency. So, revert back to this behaviour. This is
not expected to have (much) impact on targets since most (all?) of
them return the same value for SizeAndLatency and CodeSize.
When optimising for size, the logic has been changed to query
CodeSize costs instead of SizeAndLatency.
This patch also adds a testing option in the unroller so that
OptSize thresholds can be specified.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85723
As with other targets, set the throughput cost of control-flow
instructions to free so that we don't miss out of vectorization
opportunities.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85283
This patch uses the feature added in D79162 to fix the cost of a
sext/zext of a masked load, or a trunc for a masked store.
Previously, those were considered cheap or even free, but it's
not the case as we cannot split the load in the same way we would for
normal loads.
This updates the costs to better reflect reality, and adds a test for it
in test/Analysis/CostModel/ARM/cast.ll.
It also adds a vectorizer test that showcases the improvement: in some
cases, the vectorizer will now choose a smaller VF when
tail-predication is enabled, which results in better codegen. (Because
if it were to use a higher VF in those cases, the code we see above
would be generated, and the vmovs would block tail-predication later in
the process, resulting in very poor codegen overall)
Original Patch by Pierre van Houtryve
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79163
Currently, getCastInstrCost has limited information about the cast it's
rating, often just the opcode and types. Sometimes there is a context
instruction as well, but it isn't trustworthy: for instance, when the
vectorizer is rating a plan, it calls getCastInstrCost with the old
instructions when, in fact, it's trying to evaluate the cost of the
instruction post-vectorization. Thus, the current system can get the
cost of certain casts incorrect as the correct cost can vary greatly
based on the context in which it's used.
For example, if the vectorizer queries getCastInstrCost to evaluate the
cost of a sext(load) with tail predication enabled, getCastInstrCost
will think it's free most of the time, but it's not always free. On ARM
MVE, a VLD2 group cannot be extended like a normal VLDR can. Similar
situations can come up with how masked loads can be extended when being
split.
To fix that, this path adds a new parameter to getCastInstrCost to give
it a hint about the context of the cast. It adds a CastContextHint enum
which contains the type of the load/store being created by the
vectorizer - one for each of the types it can produce.
Original patch by Pierre van Houtryve
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79162
For a long time, the InstCombine pass handled target specific
intrinsics. Having target specific code in general passes was noted as
an area for improvement for a long time.
D81728 moves most target specific code out of the InstCombine pass.
Applying the target specific combinations in an extra pass would
probably result in inferior optimizations compared to the current
fixed-point iteration, therefore the InstCombine pass resorts to newly
introduced functions in the TargetTransformInfo when it encounters
unknown intrinsics.
The patch should not have any effect on generated code (under the
assumption that code never uses intrinsics from a foreign target).
This introduces three new functions:
TargetTransformInfo::instCombineIntrinsic
TargetTransformInfo::simplifyDemandedUseBitsIntrinsic
TargetTransformInfo::simplifyDemandedVectorEltsIntrinsic
A few target specific parts are left in the InstCombine folder, where
it makes sense to share code. The largest left-over part in
InstCombineCalls.cpp is the code shared between arm and aarch64.
This allows to move about 3000 lines out from InstCombine to the targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81728
If a vector body has live-out values, it is probably a reduction, which needs a
final reduction step after the loop. MVE has a VADDV instruction to reduce
integer vectors, but doesn't have an equivalent one for float vectors. A
live-out value that is not recognised as reduction later in the optimisation
pipeline will result in the tail-predicated loop to be reverted to a
non-predicated loop and this is very expensive, i.e. it has a significant
performance impact, which is what we hope to avoid with fine tuning the ARM TTI
hook preferPredicateOverEpilogue implementation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82953
This refactors option -disable-mve-tail-predication to take different arguments
so that we have 1 option to control tail-predication rather than several
different ones.
This is also a prep step for D82953, in which we want to reject reductions
unless that is requested with this option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83133
Summary:
This patch separates the peeling specific parameters from the UnrollingPreferences,
and creates a new struct called PeelingPreferences. Functions which used the
UnrollingPreferences struct for peeling have been updated to use the PeelingPreferences struct.
Author: sidbav (Sidharth Baveja)
Reviewers: Whitney (Whitney Tsang), Meinersbur (Michael Kruse), skatkov (Serguei Katkov), ashlykov (Arkady Shlykov), bogner (Justin Bogner), hfinkel (Hal Finkel), anhtuyen (Anh Tuyen Tran), nikic (Nikita Popov)
Reviewed By: Meinersbur (Michael Kruse)
Subscribers: fhahn (Florian Hahn), hiraditya (Aditya Kumar), llvm-commits, LLVM
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80580
This adjusts the MVE fp16 cost model, similar to how we already do for
integer casts. It uses the base cost of 1 per cvt for most fp extend /
truncates, but adjusts it for loads and stores where we know that a
extending load has been used to get the load into the correct lane, and
only an MVE VCVTB is then needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81813
This adds some default costs for fp extends and truncates, generally
costing them as 1 per lane. If the type is not legal then the cost will
include a call to an __aeabi_ function.
Some NEON code is also adjusted to make sure it applies to the expected
types, now that fp16 is a more common thing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82458
This expands the existing extend costs with a few extras for larger
types than legal, which will usually be split under MVE. It also adds
trunk support for the same thing. These should not have a large effect
on many things, but makes the costs explicit and keeps a certain balance
between the trunks and extends.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82457
This alters getMemoryOpCost to use the Base TargetTransformInfo version
that includes some additional checks for whether extending loads are
legal. This will generally have the effect of making <2 x ..> and some
<4 x ..> loads/stores more expensive, which in turn should help favour
larger vector factors.
Notably it alters the cost of a <4 x half>, which with the current
codegen will be expensive if it is not extended.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82456
The main interface has been migrated to Align already but a few backends where broadening the type from Align to MaybeAlign.
This patch makes sure all implementations conform to the public API.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82465
Summary:
Get back `const` partially lost in one of recent changes.
Additionally specify explicit qualifiers in few places.
Reviewers: samparker
Reviewed By: samparker
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82383
This emits new IR intrinsic @llvm.get.active.mask for tail-folded vectorised
loops if the intrinsic is supported by the backend, which is checked by
querying TargetTransform hook emitGetActiveLaneMask.
This intrinsic creates a mask representing active and inactive vector lanes,
which is used by the masked load/store instructions that are created for
tail-folded loops. The semantics of @llvm.get.active.mask are described here in
LangRef:
https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#llvm-get-active-lane-mask-intrinsics
This intrinsic is also used to provide a hint to the backend. That is, the
second argument of the intrinsic represents the back-edge taken count of the
loop. For MVE, for example, we use that to set up tail-predication, which is a
new form of predication in MVE for vector loops that implicitely predicates the
last vector loop iteration by implicitely setting active/inactive lanes, i.e.
the tail loop is predicated. In order to set up a tail-predicated vector loop,
we need to know the number of data elements processed by the vector loop, which
corresponds the the tripcount of the scalar loop, which we can now reconstruct
using @llvm.get.active.mask.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79100
Similar to a recent change to the X86 backend, this changes things so
that we always produce a reduction intrinsics for all reduction types,
not just the legal ones. This gives a better chance in the backend to
custom lower them to something more suitable for MVE. Especially for
something like fadd the in-order reduction produced during DAG lowering
is already better than the shuffles produced in the midend, and we can
do even better with a bit of custom lowering.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81398
Add the remaining arithmetic opcodes into the generic implementation
of getUserCost and then call this from getInstructionThroughput. Most
of the backends have been modified to return the base implementation
for cost kinds other RecipThroughput. The outlier here is AMDGPU
which already uses getArithmeticInstrCost for all the cost kinds.
This change means that most of the opcodes can be removed from that
backends implementation of getUserCost.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80992
Add cases for icmp, fcmp and select into the switch statement of the
generic getUserCost implementation with getInstructionThroughput then
calling into it. The BasicTTI and backend implementations have be set
to return a default value (1) when a cost other than throughput is
being queried.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80550
Use getMemoryOpCost from the generic implementation of getUserCost
and have getInstructionThroughput return the result of that for loads
and stores.
This also means that the X86 implementation of getUserCost can be
removed with the functionality folded into its getMemoryOpCost.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80984
This is split off from D79100 and adds a new target hook emitGetActiveLaneMask
that can be queried to check if the intrinsic @llvm.get.active.lane.mask() is
supported by the backend and if it should be emitted for a given loop.
See also commit rG7fb8a40e5220 and its commit message for more details/context
on this new intrinsic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80597
Add the remaining cast instruction opcodes to the base implementation
of getUserCost and directly return the result. This allows
getInstructionThroughput to return getUserCost for the casts. This
has required changes to PPC and SystemZ because they implement
getUserCost and/or getCastInstrCost with adjustments for vector
operations. Adjusts have also been made in the remaining backends
that implement the method so that they still produce a cost of zero
or one for cost kinds other than throughput.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79848
If the caller needs to reponsible for making sure the MaybeAlign
has a value, then we should just make the caller convert it to an Align
with operator*.
I explicitly deleted the relational comparison operators that
were being inherited from Optional. It's unclear what the meaning
of two MaybeAligns were one is defined and the other isn't
should be. So make the caller reponsible for defining the behavior.
I left the ==/!= operators from Optional. But now that exposed a
weird quirk that ==/!= between Align and MaybeAlign required the
MaybeAlign to be defined. But now we use the operator== from
Optional that takes an Optional and the Value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80455
This patch adds a new TTI hook to allow targets to tell LSR that
a chain including some instruction is already profitable and
should not be optimized. This patch also adds an implementation
of this TTI hook for ARM so LSR doesn't optimize chains that include
the VCTP intrinsic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79418
- Specifically check for sext/zext users which have 'long' form NEON
instructions.
- Add more entries to the table for sext/zexts so that we can report
more accurately the number of vmovls required for NEON.
- Pass the instruction to the pass implementation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79561
getScalarizationOverhead is only ever called with vectors (and we already had a load of cast<VectorType> calls immediately inside the functions).
Followup to D78357
Reviewed By: @samparker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79341
Make the kind of cost explicit throughout the cost model which,
apart from making the cost clear, will allow the generic parts to
calculate better costs. It will also allow some backends to
approximate and correlate the different costs if they wish. Another
benefit is that it will also help simplify the cost model around
immediate and intrinsic costs, where we currently have multiple APIs.
RFC thread:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-April/141263.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79002
There are several different types of cost that TTI tries to provide
explicit information for: throughput, latency, code size along with
a vague 'intersection of code-size cost and execution cost'.
The vectorizer is a keen user of RecipThroughput and there's at least
'getInstructionThroughput' and 'getArithmeticInstrCost' designed to
help with this cost. The latency cost has a single use and a single
implementation. The intersection cost appears to cover most of the
rest of the API.
getUserCost is explicitly called from within TTI when the user has
been explicit in wanting the code size (also only one use) as well
as a few passes which are concerned with a mixture of size and/or
a relative cost. In many cases these costs are closely related, such
as when multiple instructions are required, but one evident diverging
cost in this function is for div/rem.
This patch adds an argument so that the cost required is explicit,
so that we can make the important distinction when necessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78635
