I am hoping to extend the reduction matching code, and it is
hard to distinguish "ReductionData" from "ReducedValueData".
So extend the tree/root metaphor to include leaves.
Another problem is that the name "OperationData" does not
provide insight into its purpose. I'm not sure if we can alter
that underlying data structure to make the code clearer.
In 35676a4f9a536a2aab768af63ddbb15bc722d7f9 I've added handling for
non-trivial dominating conditions that imply non-zero on the true
branch. This adds the same support for the false branch.
The changes in pr45360.ll change block ordering and naming, but
don't change the control flow. The urem is still guaraded by a
non-zero check correctly.
Add tests for non-trivial conditions that imply non-zero on the
false branch rather than the true branch.
The last case already folds due to canonicalization.
Define vwredsumu/vwredsum/vfwredosum/vfwredsum
We work with @rogfer01 from BSC to come out this patch.
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <rofirrim@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-by: Zakk Chen <zakk.chen@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93807
The dominating condition handling in isKnownNonZero() currently
only takes into account conditions of the form "x != 0" or "x == 0".
However, there are plenty of other conditions that imply non-zero,
a common one being "x s> 0".
Peculiarly, the handling for assumes was already dealing with more
general non-zero-ness conditions, so this just reuses the same
logic for the dominating condition case.
Check conditions that imply non-zero, even if they are not literally
"x != 0".
Using ctlz for testing, as explicit comparison might get folded by
other reasoning.
D71264 started using a context instruction in a computeKnownBits()
call. However, if aliasing between two GEPs is checked, then the
choice of context instruction will be different for alias(GEP1, GEP2)
and alias(GEP2, GEP1), which is not supposed to happen.
Resolve this by remembering which GEP a certain VarIndex belongs to,
and use that as the context instruction. This makes the choice of
context instruction predictable and symmetric.
It should be noted that this choice of context instruction is
non-optimal (just like the previous choice): The AA query result is
only valid at points that are reachable from *both* instructions.
Using either one of them is conservatively correct, but a larger
context may also be valid to use.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93183
This is similar to D93760.
When something is wrong with the hash table header we dump
its context as a raw data.
Currently we have the calculation overflow issue and it is possible to
bypass the validation we have (and crash).
The patch fixes it.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93799
It was discussed in D92545 that we might want to improve messages
reported when something is wrong with the stack size section.
This patch does it.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93802
Define vpopc/vfirst intrinsics and lower to V instructions.
We work with @rogfer01 from BSC to come out this patch.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93795
Define vector mask-register logical intrinsics and lower them
to V instructions. Also define pseudo instructions vmmv.m
and vmnot.m.
We work with @rogfer01 from BSC to come out this patch.
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <rofirrim@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-by: Zakk Chen <zakk.chen@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93705
This patch defines vrgather intrinsics and lower to V instructions.
We work with @rogfer01 from BSC to come out this patch.
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <rofirrim@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-by: ShihPo Hung <shihpo.hung@sifive.com>
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93797
integer group:
vredsum/vredmaxu/vredmax/vredminu/vredmin/vredand/vredor/vredxor
float group:
vfredosum/vfredsum/vfredmax/vfredmin
We work with @rogfer01 from BSC to come out this patch.
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <rofirrim@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-by: Zakk Chen <zakk.chen@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93746
While `%x.curr` is always safe to compute, because `LoopBackedgeTakenCount`
will always be smaller than `bitwidth(X)`, i.e. we never get poison,
rewriting `%x.next` is more complicated, however, because `X << LoopTripCount`
will be poison iff `LoopTripCount == bitwidth(X)` (which will happen
iff `BitPos` is `bitwidth(x) - 1` and `X` is `1`).
So unless we know that isn't the case (as alive2 notes, we know it's safe
to do iff shift had no-wrap flags, or bitpos does not indicate signbit,
or we know that %x is never `1`), we'll need to emit an alternative,
safe IR, by either just shifting the `%x.curr`, or conditionally selecting
between the computed `%x.next` and `0`..
Former IR looks better so let's do that.
While there, ensure that we don't drop no-wrap flags from said shift.
In particular, add tests with no-wrap flags on shift,
a test where %x is not `1`, and ensure that tests where %bit
is a constant bitwidth-1, or is not a constant bitwidth-1
test both liveout values.
This is one of the deficiencies that can be observed in
https://godbolt.org/z/YPczsG after D91038 patch set.
This exposed two missing folds, one was fixed by the previous commit,
another one is `(A ^ B) | ~(A ^ B) --> -1` / `(A ^ B) & ~(A ^ B) --> 0`.
`-early-cse` will catch it: https://godbolt.org/z/4n1T1v,
but isn't meaningful to fix it in InstCombine,
because we'd need to essentially do our own CSE,
and we can't even rely on `Instruction::isIdenticalTo()`,
because there are no guarantees that the order of operands matches.
So let's just accept it as a loss.
This reverts commit 899faa50f206073cdd8eeaaa130ffa15f850e656.
Upon further consideration, this does not fix the right issue.
Doing this fold for non-inbounds GEPs is legal, because the
resulting pointer is still based-on null, which has no associated
address range, and as such and access to it is UB.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48577#c3
Currently 'resume' is lowered to _Unwind_Resume with out "noreturn" attribute. Semantically _Unwind_Resume library call is expected to never return and should be marked as such. Though I didn't find any changes in behavior of existing tests there will be a difference once https://reviews.llvm.org/D79485 lands.
I was not able to come up with the test case anything better than just checking for presence of "noreturn" attribute. Please let me know if there is a better way to test the change.
Reviewed By: xbolva00
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93682
Currently, the compiler crashes in instruction selection of global
load/stores in gfx600 due to the lack of FLAT instructions. This patch
fix the crash by selecting MUBUF instructions for global load/stores
in gfx600.
Authored-by: Praveen Velliengiri <Praveen.Velliengiri@amd.com>
Reviewed by: t-tye
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92483
This reverts commit eb79fd3c928dbbb97f7937963361c1dad2bf8222.
This causes stage2 crashes, possibly due to StringMap being
miscompiled. Reverting for now.
When something is wrong with the GNU hash table header we dump
its context as a raw data.
Currently we have the calculation overflow issue and it is possible to
bypass the validation we have (and crash).
The patch fixes it.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93760
This commit copies existing tests at llvm/Transforms and replaces
'insertelement undef' in those files with 'insertelement poison'.
(see https://reviews.llvm.org/D93586)
Tests listed using this script:
grep -R -E '^[^;]*insertelement <.*> undef,' . | cut -d":" -f1 | uniq |
wc -l
Tests updated:
file_org=llvm/test/Transforms/$1
file=${file_org%.ll}-inseltpoison.ll
cp $file_org $file
sed -i -E 's/^([^;]*)insertelement <(.*)> undef/\1insertelement <\2> poison/g' $file
head -1 $file | grep "Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py" -q
if [ "$?" == 1 ]; then
echo "$file : should be manually updated"
# I manually updated the script
exit 1
fi
python3 ./llvm/utils/update_test_checks.py --opt-binary=./build-releaseassert/bin/opt $file
Some predicates, can be considered the same as long as the operands are
flipped. For example, a > b gives the same result as b > a. This maps
instructions in a greater than form, to their appropriate less than
form, swapping the operands in the IRInstructionData only, allowing for
more flexible matching.
Tests:
llvm/test/Transforms/IROutliner/outlining-isomorphic-predicates.ll
llvm/unittests/Analysis/IRSimilarityIdentifierTest.cpp
Reviewers: jroelofs, paquette
Recommit of commit 050392660249c70c00e909ae4a7151ba2c766235
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87310
Fixes a bug introduced by D91589.
When folding `(sext (not i1 x)) -> (add (zext i1 x), -1)`, we try to replace the not first when possible. If we replace the not in-visit, then the now invalidated node will be returned, and subsequently we will return an invalid sext. In cases where the not is replaced in-visit we can simply return SDValue, as the not in the current sext should have already been replaced.
Thanks @jgorbe, for finding the below reproducer.
The following reduced test case crashes clang when built with `clang -O1 -frounding-math`:
```
template <class> class a {
int b() { return c == 0.0 ? 0 : -1; }
int c;
};
template class a<long>;
```
A debug build of clang produces this "assertion failed" error:
```
clang: /home/jgorbe/code/llvm/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp:264: void {anonymous}::DAGCombiner::AddToWorklist(llvm::
SDNode*): Assertion `N->getOpcode() != ISD::DELETED_NODE && "Deleted Node added to Worklist"' failed.
```
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93274
