These instructions end in "S" but are not flag-setting, so they need including
in the list of special cases in the assembly parser.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21077
llvm-svn: 272015
Currently the only way to use the (V)MOVNTDQA nontemporal vector loads instructions is through the int_x86_sse41_movntdqa style builtins.
This patch adds support for lowering nontemporal loads from general IR, allowing us to remove the movntdqa builtins in a future patch.
We currently still fold nontemporal loads into suitable instructions, we should probably look at removing this (and nontemporal stores as well) or at least make the target's folding implementation aware that its dealing with a nontemporal memory transaction.
There is also an issue that VMOVNTDQA only acts on 128-bit vectors on pre-AVX2 hardware - so currently a normal ymm load is still used on AVX1 targets.
Differential Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20965
llvm-svn: 272011
Currently the only way to use the (V)MOVNTDQA nontemporal vector loads instructions is through the int_x86_sse41_movntdqa style builtins.
This patch adds support for lowering nontemporal loads from general IR, allowing us to remove the movntdqa builtins in a future patch.
We currently still fold nontemporal loads into suitable instructions, we should probably look at removing this (and nontemporal stores as well) or at least make the target's folding implementation aware that its dealing with a nontemporal memory transaction.
There is also an issue that VMOVNTDQA only acts on 128-bit vectors on pre-AVX2 hardware - so currently a normal ymm load is still used on AVX1 targets.
Differential Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20965
llvm-svn: 272010
Using an LLVM IR aggregate return value type containing three
or more integer values causes an abort in the fast isel pass.
This patch adds two more registers to RetCC_PPC64_ELF_FIS to
allow returning up to four integers with fast isel, just the
same as is currently supported with regular isel (RetCC_PPC).
This is needed for Swift and (possibly) other non-clang frontends.
Fixes PR26190.
llvm-svn: 272005
We currently only combine to blend+zero if the target value type has 8 elements or less, but this was missing a lot of cases where the combined mask had been widened.
This change makes it so we use the combined mask to determine the blend value type, allowing us to catch more widened cases.
llvm-svn: 272003
A Thumb-2 post-indexed LDR instruction such as:
ldr.w r0, [r1], #4
Can be rewritten as:
ldm.n r1!, {r0}
LDMs can be more expensive than LDRs on some cores, so this has been enabled only in minsize mode.
llvm-svn: 272002
If we have an LDM that uses only low registers and doesn't write to its base register:
ldm.w r0, {r1, r2, r3}
And that base register is dead after the LDM, then we can convert it to writeback form and use a narrow encoding:
ldm.n r0!, {r1, r2, r3}
Obviously, this introduces a new register write and so can cause WAW hazards, so I've enabled it only in minsize mode. This is a code size trick that ARM Compiler 5 ("armcc") does that we don't.
llvm-svn: 272000
The Thumb2 conditional branch B<cond>.W has a different encoding (T3)
to the unconditional branch B.W (T4) as it needs to record <cond>.
As the encoding is different the B<cond>.W is given a different
relocation type.
ELF for the ARM Architecture 4.6.1.6 (Table-13) states that
R_ARM_THM_JUMP19 should be used for B<cond>.W. At present the
MC layer is using the R_ARM_THM_JUMP24 from B.W.
This change makes B<cond>.W use R_ARM_THM_JUMP19 and alters the
existing test that checks for R_ARM_THM_JUMP24 to expect
R_ARM_THM_JUMP19.
llvm-svn: 271997
Unlike native shifts, the AVX2 per-element shift instructions VPSRAV/VPSRLV/VPSLLV handle out of range shift values (logical shifts set the result to zero, arithmetic shifts splat the sign bit).
If the shift amount is constant we can sometimes convert these instructions to native shifts:
1 - if all shift amounts are in range then the conversion is trivial.
2 - out of range arithmetic shifts can be clamped to the (bitwidth - 1) (a legal shift amount) before conversion.
3 - logical shifts just return zero if all elements have out of range shift amounts.
In addition, UNDEF shift amounts are handled - either as an UNDEF shift amount in a native shift or as an UNDEF in the logical 'all out of range' zero constant special case for logical shifts.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19675
llvm-svn: 271996
This patch adds support for folding undef/zero/constant inputs to MOVMSK instructions.
The SSE/AVX versions can be fully folded, but the MMX version can only handle undef inputs.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20998
llvm-svn: 271990
In order to efficiently write PDBs, we need to be able to make a
StreamWriter class similar to a StreamReader, which can transparently deal
with writing to discontiguous streams, and we need to use this for all
writing, similar to how we use StreamReader for all reading.
Most discontiguous streams are the typical numbered streams that appear in
a PDB file and are described by the directory, but the exception to this,
that until now has been parsed by hand, is the directory itself.
MappedBlockStream works by querying the directory to find out which blocks
a stream occupies and various other things, so naturally the same logic
could not possibly work to describe the blocks that the directory itself
resided on.
To solve this, I've introduced an abstraction IPDBStreamData, which allows
the client to query for the list of blocks occupied by the stream, as well
as the stream length. I provide two implementations of this: one which
queries the directory (for indexed streams), and one which queries the
super block (for the directory stream).
This has the side benefit of vastly simplifying the code to parse the
directory. Whereas before a mini state machine was rolled by hand, now we
simply use FixedStreamArray to read out the stream sizes, then build a
vector of FixedStreamArrays for the stream map, all in just a few lines of
code.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21046
llvm-svn: 271982
TLS access requires an offset from the TLS index. The index itself is the
section-relative distance of the symbol. For ARM, the relevant relocation
(IMAGE_REL_ARM_SECREL) is applied as a constant. This means that the value may
not be an immediate and must be lowered into a constant pool. This offset will
not be base relocated. We were previously emitting the actual address of the
symbol which would be base relocated and would therefore be the vaue offset by
the ImageBase + TLS Offset.
llvm-svn: 271974
This reverts commit r271962 and reinstantes r271957.
MSVC's linker doesn't appear to like it if you have an empty symbol
substream, so only open a symbol substream if we're going to emit
something about globals into it.
Makes check-asan pass.
llvm-svn: 271965
scalarizePHI only looked for phis that have exactly two uses - the "latch"
use, and an extract. Unfortunately, we can not assume all equivalent extracts
are CSE'd, since InstCombine itself may create an extract which is a duplicate
of an existing one. This extends it to handle several distinct extracts from
the same index.
This should fix at least some of the performance regressions from PR27988.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20983
llvm-svn: 271961
Arrange to call verify(Function &) on each function, followed by
verify(Module &), whether the verifier is being used from the pass or
from verifyModule(). As a side effect, this fixes an issue that caused
us not to call verify(Function &) on unmaterialized functions from
verifyModule().
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21042
llvm-svn: 271956
Remove previously unreachable code that verifies that a function definition has
an entry block. By definition, a function definition has at least one block.
llvm-svn: 271948
Calls to this function are currently injected by the
``SanitizerCoverageModule`` pass when the both the ``indirect-calls``
and ``trace-pc`` sanitizer coverage options are enabled and the code
being instrumented has indirect calls. Previously because LibFuzzer did
not define this function this would lead to link errors when building
some of the tests on OSX.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20946
llvm-svn: 271938
In some cases, when simplifying with SCEV, we might consider pointer values as
just usual integer values. Thus, we might get a different type from what we
had originally in the map of simplified values, and hence we need to check
types before operating on the values.
This fixes PR28015.
llvm-svn: 271931
Summary:
Fix LSRInstance::HoistInsertPosition() to check the original insert
position block first for a canonical insertion point that is dominated
by all inputs. This leads to SCEV being able to reuse more instructions
since it currently tracks the instructions it creates for reuse by
keeping a table of <Value, insert point> pairs.
Originally reviewed in http://reviews.llvm.org/D18001
Reviewers: atrick
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mzolotukhin, mcrosier
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18480
llvm-svn: 271929
The data strucutre in the new FPO stream is described in the
PE/COFF spec. There is one record per function if frame pointer
is omitted.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20999
llvm-svn: 271926
The code layout that TailMerging (inside BranchFolding) works on is not the
final layout optimized based on the branch probability. Generally, after
BlockPlacement, many new merging opportunities emerge.
This patch calls Tail Merging after MBP and calls MBP again if Tail Merging
merges anything.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20276
llvm-svn: 271925
Summary:
Following D20970 (committed as r271726).
This is a substantial refactoring of the host CPU detection code.
There is no functionality change intended, but the changes are extensive.
Definitions of architecture types and subtypes are by no means exhaustive or
perfectly defined, but a fair starting point.
Suggestions for futher improvements are welcome.
Reviewers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20988
llvm-svn: 271921
In r271810 ( http://reviews.llvm.org/rL271810 ), I loosened the check
above this to work for any Constant rather than ConstantInt. AFAICT,
that part makes sense if we can determine that the shrunken/extended
constant remained equal. But it doesn't make sense for this later
transform where we assume that the constant DID change.
This could assert for a ConstantExpr:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28011
And it could be wrong for a vector as shown in the added regression test.
llvm-svn: 271908
Another step for unification llvm assembler/disassembler with sp3.
Besides, CodeGen output is a bit improved, thus changes in CodeGen tests.
Assembler/Disassembler tests updated/added.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20796
llvm-svn: 271900
