1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-11-22 10:42:39 +01:00
Commit Graph

8878 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Esme-Yi
11bbb4a8e4 [llvm-readobj][XCOFF] Add support for printing the String Table.
Summary: The patch adds the StringTable dumping to
llvm-readobj. Currently only XCOFF is supported.

Reviewed By: jhenderson

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104613
2021-07-05 04:16:58 +00:00
Jonas Devlieghere
3020664b33 Revert "[DebugInfo] Enforce implicit constraints on distinct MDNodes"
This reverts commit 8cd35ad854ab4458fd509447359066ea3578b494.

It breaks `TestMembersAndLocalsWithSameName.py` on GreenDragon and
Mikael Holmén points out in D104827 that bitcode files created with the
patch cannot be parsed with binaries built before it.
2021-07-02 15:57:07 -07:00
Alex Richardson
a73a5b4199 Place the BlockAddress type in the address space of the containing function
While this should not matter for most architectures (where the program
address space is 0), it is important for CHERI (and therefore Arm Morello).
We use address space 200 for all of our code pointers and without this
change we assert in the SelectionDAG handling of BlockAddress nodes.

It is also useful for AVR: previously programs targeting
AVR that attempt to read their own machine code
via a pointer to a label would instead read from RAM
using a pointer relative to the the start of program flash.

Reviewed By: dylanmckay, theraven
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48803
2021-07-02 12:17:55 +01:00
Joel E. Denny
4a1757d821 [lit] Extend --xfail/LIT_XFAIL to take full test name
The new documentation entry gives an example use case from
libomptarget.

Reviewed By: yln, jhenderson, davezarzycki

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105208
2021-07-01 15:46:37 -04:00
Marcos Horro
a240604c37 [llvm-mca] Fix JSON output (PR50922)
Based on the discussion in PR50922, minor changes have been done to properly
output a valid JSON.  Removed "not implemented" keys.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105064
2021-07-01 12:53:20 +01:00
David Spickett
d59877b7e5 [llvm][docs] Bump release number from 12 -> 13
This seems to have been forgotten. The result was the title
of pages like https://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html

Was:
<title>LLVM 13.0.0 Release Notes &#8212; LLVM 12 documentation</title>

Reviewed By: tstellar

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105189
2021-07-01 11:07:03 +00:00
Jon Roelofs
b3511ee3cf [GISel] Support llvm.memcpy.inline
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105072
2021-06-30 12:39:05 -07:00
Louis Dionne
6766b6d75d [lit] Add the ability to parse regexes in Lit boolean expressions
This patch augments Lit with the ability to parse regular expressions
in boolean expressions. This includes REQUIRES:, XFAIL:, UNSUPPORTED:,
and all other special Lit markup that evaluates to a boolean expression.

Regular expressions can be specified by enclosing them in {{...}},
similarly to how FileCheck handles such regular expressions. The regular
expression can either be on its own, or it can be part of an identifier.
For example, a match expression like {{.+}}-apple-darwin{{.+}} would match
the following variables:

     x86_64-apple-darwin20.0
     arm64-apple-darwin20.0
     arm64-apple-darwin22.0
     etc...

In the long term, this could be used to remove the need to handle the
target triple specially when parsing boolean expressions.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104572
2021-06-30 10:52:16 -04:00
Tony Tye
47ca9dba51 [AMDGPU] Update gfx90a memory model support
Update AMDGPU gfx90a memory model to make coarse grain memory allocations
consistent when fine grained system scope atomic acquire and release is
performed.

Reviewed By: rampitec

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105137
2021-06-30 04:05:22 +00:00
Fangrui Song
07d4532a78 [llvm-readobj] Make -s and -t match llvm-readelf
llvm-readobj is an internal testing tool for binary formats. Its output and
command line options do not need to be stable. It isn't supposed to be part of a
build process.

llvm-readelf was created as a user-facing utility and its interface intends to
be compatible with GNU readelf (unless there are good reasons not to).

The two tools have mostly compatible options. -s and -t are noticeable
exceptions due to history. I think the cost of keeping the inconsistency
overweighs the little history-compatible benefit and hinders transition from
cl::opt to OptTable, so let's change it.

Reviewed By: jhenderson

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105055
2021-06-29 11:56:26 -07:00
Nick Desaulniers
fd64c3a741 [Inline] prevent inlining on noprofile mismatch
Similar to
commit bc044a88ee3c ("[Inline] prevent inlining on stack protector mismatch")

The noprofile function attribute is meant to prevent compiler
instrumentation from being inserted into a function. Inlining may defeat
the developer's intent. If the caller and callee don't either BOTH have
the attribute or BOTH lack the attribute, suppress inline substitution.

This matches behavior being proposed in GCC:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/573511.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80223

Add LangRef entry for noprofile fn attr, similar to text added in D93422
and D104944.

Reviewed By: MaskRay, melver, phosek

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104810
2021-06-29 10:32:03 -07:00
gbreynoo
39a9ec9e1c [llvm-objdump] Add --no-print-imm-hex to the command guide
The option --no-print-imm-hex was not included in the command guide for
llvm-objdump but appears in the help text. This commit adds it to the
command guide.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104717
2021-06-29 17:18:32 +01:00
Scott Linder
47e3a5ca06 [DebugInfo] Enforce implicit constraints on distinct MDNodes
Add UNIQUED and DISTINCT properties in Metadata.def and use them to
implement restrictions on the `distinct` property of MDNodes:

* DIExpression can currently be parsed from IR or read from bitcode
  as `distinct`, but this property is silently dropped when printing
  to IR. This causes accepted IR to fail to round-trip. As DIExpression
  appears inline at each use in the canonical form of IR, it cannot
  actually be `distinct` anyway, as there is no syntax to describe it.
* Similarly, DIArgList is conceptually always uniqued. It is currently
  restricted to only appearing in contexts where there is no syntax for
  `distinct`, but for consistency it is treated equivalently to
  DIExpression in this patch.
* DICompileUnit is already restricted to always being `distinct`, but
  along with adding general support for the inverse restriction I went
  ahead and described this in Metadata.def and updated the parser to be
  general. Future nodes which have this restriction can share this
  support.

The new UNIQUED property applies to DIExpression and DIArgList, and
forbids them to be `distinct`. It also implies they are canonically
printed inline at each use, rather than via MDNode ID.

The new DISTINCT property applies to DICompileUnit, and requires it to
be `distinct`.

A potential alternative change is to forbid the non-inline syntax for
DIExpression entirely, as is done with DIArgList implicitly by requiring
it appear in the context of a function. For example, we would forbid:

    !named = !{!0}
    !0 = !DIExpression()

Instead we would only accept the equivalent inlined version:

    !named = !{!DIExpression()}

This essentially removes the ability to create a `distinct` DIExpression
by construction, as there is no syntax for `distinct` inline. If this
patch is accepted as-is, the result would be that the non-canonical
version is accepted, but the following would be an error and produce a diagnostic:

    !named = !{!0}
    ; error: 'distinct' not allowed for !DIExpression()
    !0 = distinct !DIExpression()

Also update some documentation to consistently use the inline syntax for
DIExpression, and to describe the restrictions on `distinct` for nodes
where applicable.

Reviewed By: StephenTozer, t-tye

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104827
2021-06-28 21:20:04 +00:00
Nick Desaulniers
520d135b42 [IR] remove assert since always_inline can appear on CallBase
I added an assertion in D91816 (documenting behavior added in D93422)
that callers and callees with mismatched fn attr's related to stack
protectors should not occur unless the callee was attributed
always_inline.

This falls apart when a call, invoke, or callbr (any instruction
inheriting from CallBase) itself has an always_inline attribute. Clang
will emit such attributes on Instructions when __attribute__((flatten))
is used to recursively force inlining from a caller.

Since these assertions only had the caller and callee Functions, and not
the call site (CallBase derived classes), we would have to search the
caller for such instructions to reconstruct the call site information.
But at that point, inlining has already occurred; the call site has
already been removed from the caller.

Remove the assertions, add a unit test for always_inline call sites, and
update the LangRef.

Another curiosity is that the always_inline Attribute on Instructions is
only expanded by the inline pass, not the always_inline pass.

Thanks to @pcc on this report when building Android's RunTime (ART)
interpreter.

Reviewed By: pcc, MaskRay

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104944
2021-06-28 13:53:57 -07:00
Akira Hatanaka
252bda7ebd [ObjC][ARC] Ignore operand bundle "clang.arc.attachedcall" on a call if
the call's return type is void

Instead of trying hard to prevent global optimization passes such as
deadargelim from changing the return type to void, just ignore the
bundle if the return type is void. clang currently emits calls to
@llvm.objc.clang.arc.noop.use, which consumes the function call result,
immediately after the function call to prevent changes to the return
type, but optimization passes can delete the call to
@llvm.objc.clang.arc.noop.use if the function call doesn't return, which
enables deadargelim to change the return type.

rdar://76671438

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103062
2021-06-28 11:02:30 -07:00
Melanie Blower
423a70f3f3 [llvm][clang][fpenv] Create new intrinsic llvm.arith.fence to control FP optimization at expression level
This intrinsic blocks floating point transformations by the optimizer.

Author: Pengfei

Reviewed By: LuoYuanke, Andy Kaylor, Craig Topper, kpn

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99675
2021-06-28 12:26:52 -04:00
Lucas Prates
b8658b0021 [NFC] Fixing short title underline in release notes file 2021-06-28 13:55:00 +01:00
Lucas Prates
e6525ee662 [Aarch64] Adding support for Armv9-A Realm Management Extension
This adds support for Armv9-A's Realm Management Extension, including
three new system registers - MFAR_EL3, GPCCR_EL3 and GPTBR_EL3 - and
four new TLBI instructions.

The reference for the Realm Management Extension can be found at: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0615/aa.

Based on patches by Victor Campos.

Reviewed By: dmgreen

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104773
2021-06-28 13:45:22 +01:00
James Henderson
7ca17cf43a [RFC][debuginfo-test] Rename debug-info lit tests for general purposes
Discussion thread:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-January/148048.html

Move debuginfo-test into a subdirectory of a new top-level directory,
called cross-project-tests. The new name replaces "debuginfo-test" as an
LLVM project enabled via LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95339

Reviewed by: aprantl
2021-06-28 11:31:40 +01:00
Igor Kudrin
21a491bfe1 [llvm-objdump] Prevent variable locations to overlap short comments
For now, the source variable locations are printed at about the same
space as the comments for disassembled code, which can make some ranges
for variables disappear if a line contains comments, for example:

                                        ┠─ bar = W1
0:  add x0, x2, #2, lsl #12     // =8192┃
4:  add z31.d, z31.d, #65280    // =0xff00
8:  nop                                 ┻

The patch shifts the report a bit to allow printing comments up to
approximately 16 characters without interferences.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104700
2021-06-28 14:25:21 +07:00
David Blaikie
a39a37f176 PR50708: Update link to Intel SIMD ABI 2021-06-27 14:55:08 -07:00
Alexander Shaposhnikov
559d4f5102 [docs][llvm-strip] Fix documentation for -s/-S
Fix the command line guide for -g/-s/-S.
In particular, previously it was incorrectly stating that -S is an alias for --strip-all.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104888
2021-06-26 21:26:53 -07:00
Tony Tye
7b3b9c00af [AMDGPU] Reserve AMDGPU ELF e_flags machine 0x43
Reviewed By: kzhuravl, rampitec

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104872
2021-06-24 22:51:47 +00:00
Bob Haarman
f3d75b435d [LangRef] clarify the meaning of noimplicitfloat
Adds some more text to the documentation for the noimplicitfloat
function attribute. Hopefully, this makes it clearer what
qualifies an implicit vs. explicit float, without becoming overly
long or going into target-specific details.

Reviewed By: rnk, craig.topper

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104061
2021-06-24 13:57:15 -07:00
Aakanksha Patil
d4359ff02a [AMDGPU] Add gfx1035 target
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104804
2021-06-24 14:32:41 -04:00
Brendon Cahoon
5e0256758b [GlobalISel] Describe undefined values for G_SBFX/G_UBFX operands
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104245
2021-06-24 09:31:41 -04:00
Jay Foad
0ec466f6d8 [MCA] Allow unlimited cycles in the timeline view
Change --max-timeline-cycles=0 to mean no limit on the number of cycles.
Use this in AMDGPU tests to show all instructions in the timeline view
instead of having it arbitrarily truncated.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104846
2021-06-24 12:54:57 +01:00
Arthur Eubanks
65bbec78f6 [docs][NewPM] Add some instructions on how to invoke opt
Also add link to blog post.

Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104812
2021-06-23 19:49:35 -07:00
Nick Desaulniers
27175210c1 [LangRef] add note to warn-frame-size about ODR
As sugguested by @dblaikie in D104342.

Reviewed By: dblaikie

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104736
2021-06-23 16:28:55 -07:00
pooja2299
45dc447bdf [docs][GISel]Added GISel documentation link
Added the GISel docs link here - https://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html#instruction-selection-section

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104204
2021-06-24 00:55:00 +05:30
Nick Desaulniers
2aca733d9e [IR] convert warn-stack-size from module flag to fn attr
Otherwise, this causes issues when building with LTO for object files
that use different values.

Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1395

Reviewed By: dblaikie, MaskRay

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104342
2021-06-21 15:09:25 -07:00
Andrew Ng
6e97d78450 [llvm-symbolizer][docs] Update example for --verbose in the guide
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104128
2021-06-17 19:12:44 +01:00
Bjorn Pettersson
29ffba4b56 Update @llvm.powi to handle different int sizes for the exponent
This can be seen as a follow up to commit 0ee439b705e82a4fe20e2,
that changed the second argument of __powidf2, __powisf2 and
__powitf2 in compiler-rt from si_int to int. That was to align with
how those runtimes are defined in libgcc.
One thing that seem to have been missing in that patch was to make
sure that the rest of LLVM also handle that the argument now depends
on the size of int (not using the si_int machine mode for 32-bit).
When using __builtin_powi for a target with 16-bit int clang crashed.
And when emitting libcalls to those rtlib functions, typically when
lowering @llvm.powi), the backend would always prepare the exponent
argument as an i32 which caused miscompiles when the rtlib was
compiled with 16-bit int.

The solution used here is to use an overloaded type for the second
argument in @llvm.powi. This way clang can use the "correct" type
when lowering __builtin_powi, and then later when emitting the libcall
it is assumed that the type used in @llvm.powi matches the rtlib
function.

One thing that needed some extra attention was that when vectorizing
calls several passes did not support that several arguments could
be overloaded in the intrinsics. This patch allows overload of a
scalar operand by adding hasVectorInstrinsicOverloadedScalarOpd, with
an entry for powi.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99439
2021-06-17 09:38:28 +02:00
Joachim Meyer
473878f311 Use -cfg-func-name value as filter for -view-cfg, etc.
Currently the value is only used when calling `F->viewCFG()` which is missing out on its potential and usefulness.
So I added the check to the printer passes as well.

Reviewed By: MaskRay

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102011
2021-06-16 23:54:51 +02:00
Patrick Holland
449e2cbd5e Reapply "[MCA] Adding the CustomBehaviour class to llvm-mca".
The original change was pushed in main as commit f7a23ecece52.
It was then reverted by commit a04f01bab2 because it caused linker failures
on buildbots that don't build the AMDGPU target.

--

Some instructions are not defined well enough within the target’s scheduling
model for llvm-mca to be able to properly simulate its behaviour. The ideal
solution to this situation is to modify the scheduling model, but that’s not
always a viable strategy. Maybe other parts of the backend depend on that
instruction being modelled the way that it is. Or maybe the instruction is quite
complex and it’s difficult to fully capture its behaviour with tablegen. The
CustomBehaviour class (which I will refer to as CB frequently) is designed to
provide intuitive scaffolding for developers to implement the correct modelling
for these instructions.

More details are available in the original commit log message (f7a23ecece52).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104149
2021-06-16 16:54:48 +01:00
Ben Dunbobbin
a74f81f967 [llvm-symbolizer] improve test and fix doc example after recent --print-source-context-lines behaviour change
I believe that after https://reviews.llvm.org/D102355 the behaviour of --print-source-context-lines has changed.

Before: --print-source-context-lines=3 prints 4 lines.
After: --print-source-context-lines=3 prints 3 lines.

Adjust the example in the docs for this change and make the testing a little more robust.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104114
2021-06-16 13:38:22 +01:00
Andrea Di Biagio
f1dc7da2e3 Revert "[MCA] Adding the CustomBehaviour class to llvm-mca"
This reverts commit f7a23ecece524564a0c3e09787142cc6061027bb.

It appears to breaks buildbots that don't build the AMDGPU backend.
2021-06-15 21:41:36 +01:00
Patrick Holland
e52d4f2208 [MCA] Adding the CustomBehaviour class to llvm-mca
Some instructions are not defined well enough within the target’s scheduling
model for llvm-mca to be able to properly simulate its behaviour. The ideal
solution to this situation is to modify the scheduling model, but that’s not
always a viable strategy. Maybe other parts of the backend depend on that
instruction being modelled the way that it is. Or maybe the instruction is quite
complex and it’s difficult to fully capture its behaviour with tablegen. The
CustomBehaviour class (which I will refer to as CB frequently) is designed to
provide intuitive scaffolding for developers to implement the correct modelling
for these instructions.

Implementation details:

llvm-mca does its best to extract relevant register, resource, and memory
information from every MCInst when lowering them to an mca::Instruction. It then
uses this information to detect dependencies and simulate stalls within the
pipeline. For some instructions, the information that gets captured within the
mca::Instruction is not enough for mca to simulate them properly. In these
cases, there are two main possibilities:

1. The instruction has a dependency that isn’t detected by mca.
2. mca is incorrectly enforcing a dependency that shouldn’t exist.

For the rest of this discussion, I will be focusing on (1), but I have put some
thought into (2) and I may revisit it in the future.

So we have an instruction that has dependencies that aren’t picked up by mca.
The basic idea for both pipelines in mca is that when an instruction wants to be
dispatched, we first check for register hazards and then we check for resource
hazards. This is where CB is injected. If no register or resource hazards have
been detected, we make a call to CustomBehaviour::checkCustomHazard() to give
the target specific CB the chance to detect and enforce any custom dependencies.

The return value for checkCustomHazaard() is an unsigned int representing the
(minimum) number of cycles that the instruction needs to stall for. It’s fine to
underestimate this value because when StallCycles gets down to 0, we’ll end up
checking for all the hazards again before the instruction is actually
dispatched. However, it’s important not to overestimate the value and the more
accurate your estimate is, the more efficient mca’s execution can be.

In general, for checkCustomHazard() to be able to detect these custom
dependencies, it needs information about the current instruction and also all of
the instructions that are still executing within the pipeline. The mca pipeline
uses mca::Instruction rather than MCInst and the current information encoded
within each mca::Instruction isn’t sufficient for my use cases. I had to add a
few extra attributes to the mca::Instruction class and have them get set by the
MCInst during instruction building. For example, the current mca::Instruction
doesn’t know its opcode, and it also doesn’t know anything about its immediate
operands (both of which I had to add to the class).

With information about the current instruction, a list of all currently
executing instructions, and some target specific objects (MCSubtargetInfo and
MCInstrInfo which the base CB class has references to), developers should be
able to detect and enforce most custom dependencies within checkCustomHazard. If
you need more information than is present in the mca::Instruction, feel free to
add attributes to that class and have them set during the lowering sequence from
MCInst.

Fortunately, in the in-order pipeline, it’s very convenient for us to pass these
arguments to checkCustomHazard. The hazard checking is taken care of within
InOrderIssueStage::canExecute(). This function takes a const InstRef as a
parameter (representing the instruction that currently wants to be dispatched)
and the InOrderIssueStage class maintains a SmallVector<InstRef, 4> which holds
all of the currently executing instructions. For the out-of-order pipeline, it’s
a bit trickier to get the list of executing instructions and this is why I have
held off on implementing it myself. This is the main topic I will bring up when
I eventually make a post to discuss and ask for feedback.

CB is a base class where targets implement their own derived classes. If a
target specific CB does not exist (or we pass in the -disable-cb flag), the base
class is used. This base class trivially returns 0 from its checkCustomHazard()
implementation (meaning that the current instruction needs to stall for 0 cycles
aka no hazard is detected). For this reason, targets or users who choose not to
use CB shouldn’t see any negative impacts to accuracy or performance (in
comparison to pre-patch llvm-mca).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104149
2021-06-15 21:30:48 +01:00
Arthur Eubanks
25efb3e5da [docs][OpaquePtr] Shuffle around the transition plan section
Emphasize that this is basically an attempt to remove
``PointerType::getElementType`` and ``Type::getPointerElementType()``.

Add a couple more subtasks.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104151
2021-06-14 10:59:41 -07:00
Jeroen Dobbelaere
c08eaddde6 Intrinsic::getName: require a Module argument
Ensure that we provide a `Module` when checking if a rename of an intrinsic is necessary.

This fixes the issue that was detected by https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=32288
(as mentioned by @fhahn), after committing D91250.

Note that the `LLVMIntrinsicCopyOverloadedName` is being deprecated in favor of `LLVMIntrinsicCopyOverloadedName2`.

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99173
2021-06-14 14:52:29 +02:00
Simon Moll
91d4645488 [VP] Binary floating-point intrinsics.
This patch implements vector-predicated intrinsics on IR level for fadd,
fsub, fmul, fdiv and frem.  There operate in the default floating-point
environment. We will use constrained fp operand bundles for constrained
vector-predicated fp math (D93455).

Reviewed By: craig.topper

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93470
2021-06-14 08:51:41 +02:00
Philip Reames
5d8953a6cd Allow ptrtoint/inttoptr of non-integral pointer types in IR
I don't like landing this change, but it's an acknowledgement of a practical reality.  Despite not having well specified semantics for inttoptr and ptrtoint involving non-integral pointer types, they are used in practice.  Here's a quick summary of the current pragmatic reality:
* I happen to know that the main external user of non-integral pointers has effectively disabled the verifier rules.
* RS4GC (the lowering pass for abstract GC machine model which is the key motivation for non-integral pointers), even supports them.  We just have all the tests using an integral pointer space to let the verifier run.
* Certain idioms (such as alignment checks for alignment N, where any relocation is guaranteed to be N byte aligned) are fine in practice.
* As implemented, inttoptr/ptrtoint are CSEd and are not control dependent.  This means that any code which is intending to check a particular bit pattern at site of use must be wrapped in an intrinsic or external function call.

This change allows them in the Verifier, and updates the LangRef to specific them as implementation dependent.  This allows us to acknowledge current reality while still leaving ourselves room to punt on figuring out "good" semantics until the future.
2021-06-11 13:38:32 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks
df6897c0ce [docs][OpaquePtr] Add some specific examples of what needs to be done 2021-06-11 12:51:46 -07:00
gbreynoo
7e227c0d37 [docs][llvm-ar] Add rsp-quoting option to the llvm-ar command guide.
I noticed that I did not update the command guide when introducing the
--rsp-quoting option. This change fixes this.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103915
2021-06-10 16:32:31 +01:00
Juneyoung Lee
0a59620fed [LangRef] Fix missing code highlighting format 2021-06-10 16:12:17 +09:00
Jim Lin
be0091c05e [Docs] Fix incorrect return type for example code 2021-06-10 14:20:11 +08:00
madhur13490
308bc0d686 [LangRef] Add link to opaque pointers
Reviewed By: aeubanks

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103981
2021-06-10 00:11:02 +05:30
Nathan Sidwell
b3363eeab8 [docs] Collate CMake options
I found the documentation of the various CMake variables difficult to
navigate, because they are unsorted. I can see they've grown
organically with new clusters of somewhat-related options, but the
result is hard to use. This collates them (treating '_' as space).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102481
2021-06-09 11:24:38 -07:00
Jim Lin
65da76df22 [docs] Fix load instructions in chapter 7 of the tutorial
Loads in the first half of the chapter are missing the type argument.

Patched By: klao (Mihaly Barasz)

Reviewed By: Jim

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90326
2021-06-09 17:39:11 +08:00
Jim Lin
a138169412 [Docs] Fix incorrect return type for example code 2021-06-09 15:22:49 +08:00
Brendon Cahoon
3a664dba6e Reland "[AMDGPU] Add gfx1013 target"
This reverts commit 211e584fa2a4c032e4d573e7cdbffd622aad0a8f.

Fixed a use-after-free error that caused the sanitizers to fail.
2021-06-08 21:15:35 -04:00
Brendon Cahoon
8238dc695f Revert "[AMDGPU] Add gfx1013 target"
This reverts commit ea10a86984ea73fcec3b12d22404a15f2f59b219.

A sanitizer buildbot reports an error.
2021-06-08 16:29:41 -04:00
Brendon Cahoon
c9fa68e102 [AMDGPU] Add gfx1013 target
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103663
2021-06-08 12:49:49 -04:00
Arthur Eubanks
4cc1a31398 Revert "[TargetLowering] Only inspect attributes in the arguments for ArgListEntry"
Needs to be discussed more.

This reverts commit 255a5c1baa6020c009934b4fa342f9f6dbbcc46
This reverts commit df2056ff3730316f376f29d9986c9913b95ceb1
This reverts commit faff79b7ca144e505da6bc74aa2b2f7cffbbf23
This reverts commit d2a9020785c6e02afebc876aa2778fa64c5cafd
2021-06-07 16:07:44 -07:00
Krzysztof Parzyszek
a4d9276f53 [docs] Set Phabricator as the tool for pre-commit reviews
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103811
2021-06-07 11:50:52 -05:00
Arthur Eubanks
b01ec7e228 [TargetLowering] Only inspect attributes in the arguments for ArgListEntry
Parameter attributes are considered part of the function [1], and like
mismatched calling conventions [2], we can't have the verifier check for
mismatched parameter attributes.

Issues can be diagnosed with D103412.

[1] https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#parameter-attributes
[2] https://llvm.org/docs/FAQ.html#why-does-instcombine-simplifycfg-turn-a-call-to-a-function-with-a-mismatched-calling-convention-into-unreachable-why-not-make-the-verifier-reject-it

Reviewed By: rnk

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101806
2021-06-03 15:52:01 -07:00
Fangrui Song
dd23a07d05 [docs] Update llvm-cov gcov
Mention some new options.

Remove outdated information about -g and -O0. -g0 works. -O1/-O2/-O3 work.
2021-06-03 12:36:27 -07:00
cynecx
be221f0b41 [LangRef] update according to unwinding support in inline asm
https://reviews.llvm.org/D95745 introduced a new `unwind` keyword for inline assembler expressions. Inline asms marked with the `unwind` keyword allows stack unwinding from inline assembly because the compiler emits unwinding information ("around" the inline asm) as it would for calls/invokes. Unwinding the stack from within non-unwind inline asm may cause UB.

Reviewed By: Amanieu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102642
2021-05-31 09:01:46 +01:00
Arthur Eubanks
f9c1930dea Revert "[TargetLowering] Only inspect attributes in the arguments for ArgListEntry"
This reverts commit 1c7f32334d4becc725b9025fd32291a0e5729acd.

Some code still needs to properly set parameter ABI attributes, see
D101806.
2021-05-29 23:08:15 -07:00
Tim Northover
859ff3505c SwiftTailCC: teach verifier musttail rules applicable to this CC.
SwiftTailCC has a different set of requirements than the C calling convention
for a tail call. The exact argument sequence doesn't have to match, but fewer
ABI-affecting attributes are allowed.

Also make sure the musttail diagnostic triggers if a musttail call isn't
actually a tail call.
2021-05-28 11:12:00 +01:00
Fangrui Song
06613cf382 [docs] llvm-objdump: Mention -M no-aliases is supported on AArch64 2021-05-26 23:57:32 -07:00
Yevgeny Rouban
0a4cf978a7 [RS4GC] Introduce intrinsics to get base ptr and offset
There can be a need for some optimizations to get (base, offset)
for any GC pointer. The base can be calculated by generating
needed instructions as it is done by the
RewriteStatepointsForGC::findBasePointer() function. The offset
can be calculated in the same way. Though to not expose the base
calculation and to make the offset calculation as simple as
ptrtoint(derived_ptr) - ptrtoint(base_ptr), which is illegal
outside RS4GC, this patch introduces 2 intrinsics:

 @llvm.experimental.gc.get.pointer.base(%derived_ptr)
 @llvm.experimental.gc.get.pointer.offset(%derived_ptr)

These intrinsics are inlined by RS4GC along with generation of
statepoint sequences.

With these new intrinsics the GC parseable lowering for atomic
memcpy intrinsics (6ec2c5e402a724ba99bce82a9cac7a3006d660f4)
could be implemented as a separate pass.

Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100445
2021-05-27 09:14:14 +07:00
naromero77
863822a0e1 [flang][docs] Initial documentation for the Fortran LLVM Test Suite.
Describes how to run the Fortran LLVM Test Suite, specifically the external SPEC CPU 2017 Fortran tests.

Reviewed By: rovka

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102877
2021-05-26 15:59:55 -05:00
pooja2299
e5cec4b7a2 [Docs] Updated the content of getting started documentation under llvm/lib/MC
Wrote about llvm/lib/MC subproject on https://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html page.

Reviewed By: arsenm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101047
2021-05-26 16:25:26 +05:30
Martin Storsjö
77c89471fd [docs] [CMake] Change recommendations for how to use LLVM_DEFINITIONS
LLVM_DEFINITIONS is a string variable containing a list of arguments
to pass to the compiler. When CMake's add_definitions is passed a
string variable, this is interpreted as one argument. To make it
behave properly, the string variable needs to be split into a list.

Despite the fact that add_definitions isn't supposed to be used like
the LLVM docs recommended, it worked fine in practice in many cases.
If the first argument in LLVM_DEFINITIONS is of the form -DFOO=42
instead of plain -DFOO, the rest of the string is treated as value
to this define. I.e. if LLVM_DEFINITIONS consists of `-DFOO=42 -DBAR`,
CMake ended up passing `-DFOO="42 -DBAR"` to the compiler.

See https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmakissues/22162
for discussion on the matter.

Changing LLVM_DEFINITIONS to be a list variable would possibly be
more disruptive; instead keep the variable defined as before but
change the recommendation for how to use it. Then projects using it
can gradually be updated to follow the new recommendation.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103044
2021-05-25 22:56:51 +03:00
Arthur Eubanks
c0b1fddf31 [docs] Explain address spaces a bit more in opaque pointers doc
Reviewed By: theraven

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102523
2021-05-25 12:35:43 -07:00
Marco Elver
b835b9cf36 [SanitizeCoverage] Add support for NoSanitizeCoverage function attribute
We really ought to support no_sanitize("coverage") in line with other
sanitizers. This came up again in discussions on the Linux-kernel
mailing lists, because we currently do workarounds using objtool to
remove coverage instrumentation. Since that support is only on x86, to
continue support coverage instrumentation on other architectures, we
must support selectively disabling coverage instrumentation via function
attributes.

Unfortunately, for SanitizeCoverage, it has not been implemented as a
sanitizer via fsanitize= and associated options in Sanitizers.def, but
rolls its own option fsanitize-coverage. This meant that we never got
"automatic" no_sanitize attribute support.

Implement no_sanitize attribute support by special-casing the string
"coverage" in the NoSanitizeAttr implementation. To keep the feature as
unintrusive to existing IR generation as possible, define a new negative
function attribute NoSanitizeCoverage to propagate the information
through to the instrumentation pass.

Fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49035

Reviewed By: vitalybuka, morehouse

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102772
2021-05-25 12:57:14 +02:00
Roman Lebedev
5d534d8259 [llvm-exegesis] Loop unrolling for loop snippet repetitor mode
I really needed this, like, factually, yesterday,
when verifying dependency breaking idioms for AMD Zen 3 scheduler model.

Consider the following example:
```
$ ./bin/llvm-exegesis --mode=inverse_throughput --snippets-file=/tmp/snippet.s --num-repetitions=1000000 --repetition-mode=duplicate
Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-4a7e50.o
---
mode:            inverse_throughput
key:
  instructions:
    - 'VPXORYrr YMM0 YMM0 YMM0'
  config:          ''
  register_initial_values: []
cpu_name:        znver3
llvm_triple:     x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
num_repetitions: 1000000
measurements:
  - { key: inverse_throughput, value: 0.31025, per_snippet_value: 0.31025 }
error:           ''
info:            ''
assembled_snippet: C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C3
...

```
What does it tell us?
So wait, it can only execute ~3 x86 AVX YMM PXOR zero-idioms per cycle?
That doesn't seem right. That's even less than there are pipes supporting this type of op.

Now, second example:
```
$ ./bin/llvm-exegesis --mode=inverse_throughput --snippets-file=/tmp/snippet.s --num-repetitions=1000000 --repetition-mode=loop
Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-2418b5.o
---
mode:            inverse_throughput
key:
  instructions:
    - 'VPXORYrr YMM0 YMM0 YMM0'
  config:          ''
  register_initial_values: []
cpu_name:        znver3
llvm_triple:     x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
num_repetitions: 1000000
measurements:
  - { key: inverse_throughput, value: 1.00011, per_snippet_value: 1.00011 }
error:           ''
info:            ''
assembled_snippet: 49B80800000000000000C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC04983C0FF75F2C3
...
```
Now that's just worse. Due to the looping, the throughput completely plummeted,
and now we can only do a single instruction/cycle!?

That's not great.
And final example:
```
$ ./bin/llvm-exegesis --mode=inverse_throughput --snippets-file=/tmp/snippet.s --num-repetitions=1000000 --repetition-mode=loop --loop-body-size=1000
Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-c402e2.o
---
mode:            inverse_throughput
key:
  instructions:
    - 'VPXORYrr YMM0 YMM0 YMM0'
  config:          ''
  register_initial_values: []
cpu_name:        znver3
llvm_triple:     x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
num_repetitions: 1000000
measurements:
  - { key: inverse_throughput, value: 0.167087, per_snippet_value: 0.167087 }
error:           ''
info:            ''
assembled_snippet: 49B80800000000000000C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC04983C0FF75F2C3
...
```

So if we merge the previous two approaches, do duplicate this single-instruction snippet 1000x
(loop-body-size/instruction count in snippet), and run a loop with 1000 iterations
over that duplicated/unrolled snippet, the measured throughput goes through the roof,
up to 5.9 instructions/cycle, which finally tells us that this idiom is zero-cycle!

Reviewed By: courbet

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102522
2021-05-25 12:08:27 +03:00
Tony Tye
39f986d2c4 [NFC][AMDGPU] Add documentation for AMD Instinct MI100 accelerator
Add link to documentation for "AMD Instinct MI100 Instruction Set
Architecture" to AMDGPUUsage.rst.

Reviewed By: kzhuravl, rampitec, dp

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102859
2021-05-21 16:51:13 +00:00
Tony Tye
8dfab88553 [NFC][AMDGPU] Mark C code in AMDGPUUsage.rst
Reviewed By: foad

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102910
2021-05-21 10:08:05 +00:00
Andy Wingo
107b591be0 [IR][Verifier] Relax restriction on alloca address spaces
In the WebAssembly target, we would like to allow alloca in two address
spaces.  The alloca instruction already has an address space argument,
but the verifier asserts that the address space of an alloca is the
default alloca address space from the datalayout.  This patch removes
this restriction.  Targets that would like to impose additional
restrictions should do so via target-specific verification passes.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101045
2021-05-21 11:52:45 +02:00
Djordje Todorovic
88aa158bd7 Recommit: "[Debugify][Original DI] Test dbg var loc preservation""
[Debugify][Original DI] Test dbg var loc preservation

    This is an improvement of [0]. This adds checking of
    original llvm.dbg.values()/declares() instructions in
    optimizations.

    We have picked a real issue that has been found with
    this (actually, picked one variable location missing
    from [1] and resolved the issue), and the result is
    the fix for that -- D100844.

    Before applying the D100844, using the options from [0]
    (but with this patch applied) on the compilation of GDB 7.11,
    the final HTML report for the debug-info issues can be found
    at [1] (please scroll down, and look for
    "Summary of Variable Location Bugs"). After applying
    the D100844, the numbers has improved a bit -- please take
    a look into [2].

    [0] https://llvm.org/docs/HowToUpdateDebugInfo.html#\
        test-original-debug-info-preservation-in-optimizations
    [1] https://djolertrk.github.io/di-check-before-adce-fix/
    [2] https://djolertrk.github.io/di-check-after-adce-fix/

    Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100845

The Unit test was failing because the pass from the test that
modifies the IR, in its runOnFunction() didn't return 'true',
so the expensive-check configuration triggered an assertion.
2021-05-21 02:04:29 -07:00
Djordje Todorovic
b69d892627 Revert "[Debugify][Original DI] Test dbg var loc preservation"
This reverts commit 76f375f3d9d6902820ffc21200e454926748c678.

This will be pushed again, after investigating a test failure:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/16/builds/11254
2021-05-20 07:11:35 -07:00
Djordje Todorovic
8ece18da90 [Debugify][Original DI] Test dbg var loc preservation
This is an improvement of [0]. This adds checking of
original llvm.dbg.values()/declares() instructions in
optimizations.

We have picked a real issue that has been found with
this (actually, picked one variable location missing
from [1] and resolved the issue), and the result is
the fix for that -- D100844.

Before applying the D100844, using the options from [0]
(but with this patch applied) on the compilation of GDB 7.11,
the final HTML report for the debug-info issues can be found
at [1] (please scroll down, and look for
"Summary of Variable Location Bugs"). After applying
the D100844, the numbers has improved a bit -- please take
a look into [2].

[0] https://llvm.org/docs/HowToUpdateDebugInfo.html\
[1] https://djolertrk.github.io/di-check-before-adce-fix/
[2] https://djolertrk.github.io/di-check-after-adce-fix/

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100845
2021-05-20 06:42:02 -07:00
Ahmed Bougacha
50227f56b6 [docs] Describe reporting security issues on the chromium tracker.
To track security issues, we're starting with the chromium bug tracker
(using the llvm project there).

We considered using Github Security Advisories.  However, they are
currently intended as a way for project owners to publicize their
security advisories, and aren't well-suited to reporting issues.

This also moves the issue-reporting paragraph to the beginning of the
document, in part to make it more discoverable, in part to allow the
anchor-linking to actually display the paragraph at the top of the page.

Note that this doesn't update the concrete list of security-sensitive
areas, which is still an open item.  When we do, we may want to move the
list of security-sensitive areas next to the issue-reporting paragraph
as well, as it seems like relevant information needed in the reporting
process.

Finally, when describing the discission medium, this splits the topics
discussed into two: the concrete security issues, discussed in the
issue tracker, and the logistics of the group, in our mailing list,
as patches on public lists, and in the monthly sync-up call.

While there, add a SECURITY.md page linking to the relevant paragraph.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100873
2021-05-19 15:21:50 -07:00
Vitaly Buka
d474f1c2ce [libfuzzer] Update doc mentioning removed flags. 2021-05-18 22:40:42 -07:00
Alex Orlov
fb84758743 [symbolizer] Added StartAddress for the resolved function.
In many cases it is helpful to know at what address the resolved function starts.
This patch adds a new StartAddress member to the DILineInfo structure.

Reviewed By: jhenderson, dblaikie

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102316
2021-05-19 02:38:13 +04:00
Arthur Eubanks
d51b2ca5b9 [docs] Fix broken docs after 1c7f32334 2021-05-18 14:38:12 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks
b8775b2a78 [TargetLowering] Only inspect attributes in the arguments for ArgListEntry
Parameter attributes are considered part of the function [1], and like
mismatched calling conventions [2], we can't have the verifier check for
mismatched parameter attributes.

This is a reland after fixing MSan issues in D102667.

[1] https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#parameter-attributes
[2] https://llvm.org/docs/FAQ.html#why-does-instcombine-simplifycfg-turn-a-call-to-a-function-with-a-mismatched-calling-convention-into-unreachable-why-not-make-the-verifier-reject-it

Reviewed By: rnk

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101806
2021-05-18 14:30:22 -07:00
Konstantin Zhuravlyov
17a1c72316 AMDGPU/Docs: Remove reserved MACH 0x3E (it is no longer reserved), sort MACHs by value 2021-05-18 16:57:56 -04:00
Ten Tzen
9ff115e8b2 [Windows SEH]: HARDWARE EXCEPTION HANDLING (MSVC -EHa) - Part 1
This patch is the Part-1 (FE Clang) implementation of HW Exception handling.

This new feature adds the support of Hardware Exception for Microsoft Windows
SEH (Structured Exception Handling).
This is the first step of this project; only X86_64 target is enabled in this patch.

Compiler options:
For clang-cl.exe, the option is -EHa, the same as MSVC.
For clang.exe, the extra option is -fasync-exceptions,
plus -triple x86_64-windows -fexceptions and -fcxx-exceptions as usual.

NOTE:: Without the -EHa or -fasync-exceptions, this patch is a NO-DIFF change.

The rules for C code:
For C-code, one way (MSVC approach) to achieve SEH -EHa semantic is to follow
three rules:
* First, no exception can move in or out of _try region., i.e., no "potential
  faulty instruction can be moved across _try boundary.
* Second, the order of exceptions for instructions 'directly' under a _try
  must be preserved (not applied to those in callees).
* Finally, global states (local/global/heap variables) that can be read
  outside of _try region must be updated in memory (not just in register)
  before the subsequent exception occurs.

The impact to C++ code:
Although SEH is a feature for C code, -EHa does have a profound effect on C++
side. When a C++ function (in the same compilation unit with option -EHa ) is
called by a SEH C function, a hardware exception occurs in C++ code can also
be handled properly by an upstream SEH _try-handler or a C++ catch(...).
As such, when that happens in the middle of an object's life scope, the dtor
must be invoked the same way as C++ Synchronous Exception during unwinding
process.

Design:
A natural way to achieve the rules above in LLVM today is to allow an EH edge
added on memory/computation instruction (previous iload/istore idea) so that
exception path is modeled in Flow graph preciously. However, tracking every
single memory instruction and potential faulty instruction can create many
Invokes, complicate flow graph and possibly result in negative performance
impact for downstream optimization and code generation. Making all
optimizations be aware of the new semantic is also substantial.

This design does not intend to model exception path at instruction level.
Instead, the proposed design tracks and reports EH state at BLOCK-level to
reduce the complexity of flow graph and minimize the performance-impact on CPP
code under -EHa option.

One key element of this design is the ability to compute State number at
block-level. Our algorithm is based on the following rationales:

A _try scope is always a SEME (Single Entry Multiple Exits) region as jumping
into a _try is not allowed. The single entry must start with a seh_try_begin()
invoke with a correct State number that is the initial state of the SEME.
Through control-flow, state number is propagated into all blocks. Side exits
marked by seh_try_end() will unwind to parent state based on existing
SEHUnwindMap[].
Note side exits can ONLY jump into parent scopes (lower state number).
Thus, when a block succeeds various states from its predecessors, the lowest
State triumphs others.  If some exits flow to unreachable, propagation on those
paths terminate, not affecting remaining blocks.
For CPP code, object lifetime region is usually a SEME as SEH _try.
However there is one rare exception: jumping into a lifetime that has Dtor but
has no Ctor is warned, but allowed:

Warning: jump bypasses variable with a non-trivial destructor

In that case, the region is actually a MEME (multiple entry multiple exits).
Our solution is to inject a eha_scope_begin() invoke in the side entry block to
ensure a correct State.

Implementation:
Part-1: Clang implementation described below.

Two intrinsic are created to track CPP object scopes; eha_scope_begin() and eha_scope_end().
_scope_begin() is immediately added after ctor() is called and EHStack is pushed.
So it must be an invoke, not a call. With that it's also guaranteed an
EH-cleanup-pad is created regardless whether there exists a call in this scope.
_scope_end is added before dtor(). These two intrinsics make the computation of
Block-State possible in downstream code gen pass, even in the presence of
ctor/dtor inlining.

Two intrinsic, seh_try_begin() and seh_try_end(), are added for C-code to mark
_try boundary and to prevent from exceptions being moved across _try boundary.
All memory instructions inside a _try are considered as 'volatile' to assure
2nd and 3rd rules for C-code above. This is a little sub-optimized. But it's
acceptable as the amount of code directly under _try is very small.

Part-2 (will be in Part-2 patch): LLVM implementation described below.

For both C++ & C-code, the state of each block is computed at the same place in
BE (WinEHPreparing pass) where all other EH tables/maps are calculated.
In addition to _scope_begin & _scope_end, the computation of block state also
rely on the existing State tracking code (UnwindMap and InvokeStateMap).

For both C++ & C-code, the state of each block with potential trap instruction
is marked and reported in DAG Instruction Selection pass, the same place where
the state for -EHsc (synchronous exceptions) is done.
If the first instruction in a reported block scope can trap, a Nop is injected
before this instruction. This nop is needed to accommodate LLVM Windows EH
implementation, in which the address in IPToState table is offset by +1.
(note the purpose of that is to ensure the return address of a call is in the
same scope as the call address.

The handler for catch(...) for -EHa must handle HW exception. So it is
'adjective' flag is reset (it cannot be IsStdDotDot (0x40) that only catches
C++ exceptions).
Suppress push/popTerminate() scope (from noexcept/noTHrow) so that HW
exceptions can be passed through.

Original llvm-dev [RFC] discussions can be found in these two threads below:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-March/140541.html
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-April/141338.html

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80344/new/
2021-05-17 22:42:17 -07:00
Alex Zinenko
01e701738c [llvm][doc] fix header for read/write_register intrinsics in LangRef
Mutli-line headers are not allowed in RST, reformat the header to be a
single wide line.
2021-05-17 18:38:16 +02:00
Tim Northover
fc5daa6083 IR/AArch64/X86: add "swifttailcc" calling convention.
Swift's new concurrency features are going to require guaranteed tail calls so
that they don't consume excessive amounts of stack space. This would normally
mean "tailcc", but there are also Swift-specific ABI desires that don't
naturally go along with "tailcc" so this adds another calling convention that's
the combination of "swiftcc" and "tailcc".

Support is added for AArch64 and X86 for now.
2021-05-17 10:48:34 +01:00
Arthur Eubanks
99d811bdc5 Revert "[TargetLowering] Only inspect attributes in the arguments for ArgListEntry"
This reverts commit 16748bd2fb1fe10d7d097961f1988327338f3f9f.

Causes https://crbug.com/1209013
2021-05-16 22:02:10 -07:00
Stanislav Mekhanoshin
af64ca04f5 [AMDGPU] Add support for architected flat scratch
Add support for the readonly flat Scratch register initialized
by the SPI.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102432
2021-05-14 10:53:48 -07:00
Dmitry Preobrazhensky
cb8494eadb [AMDGPU][MC][NFC][DOC] Updated AMD GPU assembler syntax description.
Summary of changes:
- added description of GFX90A;
- minor bugfixing and improvements.
2021-05-14 16:13:30 +03:00
Tim Northover
5661b7eb80 IR+AArch64: add a "swiftasync" argument attribute.
This extends any frame record created in the function to include that
parameter, passed in X22.

The new record looks like [X22, FP, LR] in memory, and FP is stored with 0b0001
in bits 63:60 (CodeGen assumes they are 0b0000 in normal operation). The effect
of this is that tools walking the stack should expect to see one of three
values there:

  * 0b0000 => a normal, non-extended record with just [FP, LR]
  * 0b0001 => the extended record [X22, FP, LR]
  * 0b1111 => kernel space, and a non-extended record.

All other values are currently reserved.

If compiling for arm64e this context pointer is address-discriminated with the
discriminator 0xc31a and the DB (process-specific) key.

There is also an "i8** @llvm.swift.async.context.addr()" intrinsic providing
front-ends access to this slot (and forcing its creation initialized to nullptr
if necessary).
2021-05-14 11:43:58 +01:00
Pooja Yadav
5296db8df0 [docs] Added llvm/cmake section
Added information about the cmake inside llvm.

Reviewed By: xgupta, jroelofs

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101925
2021-05-14 14:10:56 +05:30
Arthur Eubanks
1b32fba3b3 [IR] Introduce the opaque pointer type
The opaque pointer type is essentially just a normal pointer type with a
null pointee type.

This also adds support for the opaque pointer type to the bitcode
reader/writer, as well as to textual IR.

To avoid confusion with existing pointer types, we disallow creating a
pointer to an opaque pointer.

Opaque pointer types should not be widely used at this point since many
parts of LLVM still do not support them. The next steps are to add some
very simple use cases of opaque pointers to make sure they work, then
start pretending that all pointers are opaque pointers and see what
breaks.

https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-May/150359.html

Reviewed By: dblaikie, dexonsmith, pcc

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101704
2021-05-13 15:22:27 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks
88e8f8e83e [docs] Add page on opaque pointer types
Reviewed By: dblaikie, dexonsmith

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102292
2021-05-13 15:10:27 -07:00
Martin Storsjö
b2438b1473 [llvm-nm] Support the -V option, print that the tool is compatible with GNU nm
This unlocks some codepaths in libtool.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102321
2021-05-13 22:36:25 +03:00
Aakanksha Patil
e5759b8eca [AMDGPU] Add gfx1034 target
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102306
2021-05-13 14:25:18 -04:00
Krzysztof Parzyszek
78ddcf78f9 Fix section title underlining in the release notes 2021-05-13 08:37:06 -05:00
Krzysztof Parzyszek
5562e5f41c Add entry about Hexagon V68 support to the release notes 2021-05-13 08:28:55 -05:00
Shoaib Meenai
011d3c9d37 [cmake] Add support for multiple distributions
LLVM's build system contains support for configuring a distribution, but
it can often be useful to be able to configure multiple distributions
(e.g. if you want separate distributions for the tools and the
libraries). Add this support to the build system, along with
documentation and usage examples.

Reviewed By: phosek

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89177
2021-05-12 11:13:18 -07:00
Tony Tye
c65c7c3cfc [NFC][AMDGPU] Correct product name for gfx908
The product name for gfx908 is "AMD Instinct MI100 Accelerator".

Reviewed By: rampitec

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102209
2021-05-11 15:17:04 +00:00
Alex Orlov
4e9da478f3 * Add support for JSON output style to llvm-symbolizer
This patch adds JSON output style to llvm-symbolizer to better support CLI automation by providing a machine readable output.

Reviewed By: jhenderson

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96883
2021-05-11 13:10:54 +04:00
Arthur Eubanks
3be78fa191 [TargetLowering] Only inspect attributes in the arguments for ArgListEntry
Parameter attributes are considered part of the function [1], and like
mismatched calling conventions [2], we can't have the verifier check for
mismatched parameter attributes.

[1] https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#parameter-attributes
[2] https://llvm.org/docs/FAQ.html#why-does-instcombine-simplifycfg-turn-a-call-to-a-function-with-a-mismatched-calling-convention-into-unreachable-why-not-make-the-verifier-reject-it

Reviewed By: rnk

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101806
2021-05-10 12:35:11 -07:00
gbreynoo
68f9c832a8 [llvm-symbolizer] Update Command Guide
The option --use-symbol-table is now a noop and does not appear in the
help text, however it still appears in the command guide. This change
removes it from the command guide and updates the description of
--output-style .

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102078
2021-05-10 17:21:34 +01:00
Fraser Cormack
8994b24c78 [LangRef][VP] Fix typos in VP sdiv/udiv examples 2021-05-06 16:37:18 +01:00