Summary:
MemorySSA needs updating each time an instruction is moved.
LICM and control flow hoisting re-hoists instructions, thus needing another update when re-moving those instructions.
Pending cleanup: the MSSA update is duplicated, should be moved inside moveInstructionBefore.
Reviewers: jnspaulsson
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, Prazek, george.burgess.iv, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57176
llvm-svn: 352092
This is the first part of splitting apart https://reviews.llvm.org/D57140 into usuable pieces. Landing the tests in advance of posting a review specifically for the demanded elements part.
llvm-svn: 352091
Summary:
An alignment should be non-zero positive power-of-two, anything and everything else is UB.
We should not have that check for all these prerequisites here, it's just UB.
Also, that was likely confusing middle-end passes.
While there, `CreateIntCast()` should be called with `/*isSigned*/ false`.
Think about it, there are two explanations: "An alignment should be positive",
therefore the sign bit is unset, so `zext` and `sext` is equivalent.
Or a second one: you have `i2 0b10` - a valid alignment,
now you `sext` it: `i2 0b110` - no longer valid alignment.
Reviewers: craig.topper, jyknight, hfinkel, erichkeane, rjmccall
Reviewed By: hfinkel, rjmccall
Subscribers: hfinkel, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54653
llvm-svn: 352089
Performing splitting early has several advantages:
- Inhibiting inlining of cold code early improves code size. Compared
to scheduling splitting at the end of the pipeline, this cuts code
size growth in half within the iOS shared cache (0.69% to 0.34%).
- Inhibiting inlining of cold code improves compile time. There's no
need to inline split cold functions, or to inline as much *within*
those split functions as they are marked `minsize`.
- During LTO, extra work is only done in the pre-link step. Less code
must be inlined during cross-module inlining.
An additional motivation here is that the most common cold regions
identified by the static/conservative splitting heuristic can (a) be
found before inlining and (b) do not grow after inlining. E.g.
__assert_fail, os_log_error.
The disadvantages are:
- Some opportunities for splitting out cold code may be missed. This
gap can potentially be narrowed by adding a worklist algorithm to the
splitting pass.
- Some opportunities to reduce code size may be lost (e.g. store
sinking, when one side of the CFG diamond is split). This does not
outweigh the code size benefits of splitting earlier.
On net, splitting early in the pipeline has substantial code size
benefits, and no major effects on memory locality or performance. We
measured memory locality using ktrace data, and consistently found that
10% fewer pages were needed to capture 95% of text page faults in key
iOS benchmarks. We measured performance on frequency-stabilized iOS
devices using LNT+externals.
This reverses course on the decision made to schedule splitting late in
r344869 (D53437).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57082
llvm-svn: 352080
It should be emitted when any floating-point operations (including
calls) are present in the object, not just when calls to printf/scanf
with floating point args are made.
The difference caused by this is very subtle: in static (/MT) builds,
on x86-32, in a program that uses floating point but doesn't print it,
the default x87 rounding mode may not be set properly upon
initialization.
This commit also removes the walk of the types pointed to by pointer
arguments in calls. (To assist in opaque pointer types migration --
eventually the pointee type won't be available.)
That latter implies that it will no longer consider a call like
`scanf("%f", &floatvar)` as sufficient to emit _fltused on its
own. And without _fltused, `scanf("%f")` will abort with error R6002. This
new behavior is unlikely to bite anyone in practice (you'd have to
read a float, and do nothing with it!), and also, is consistent with
MSVC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56548
llvm-svn: 352076
Write a couple of variations on vector geps w/both scalars and vectors live over safepoints. Use update_test_checks to show all the IR.
llvm-svn: 352062
After submitting https://reviews.llvm.org/D57138, I realized it was slightly more conservative than needed. The scalar indices don't appear to be a problem on a vector gep, we even had a test for that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57161
llvm-svn: 352061
This is an alternative to https://reviews.llvm.org/D57103. After discussion, we dedicided to check this in as a temporary workaround, and pursue a true fix under the original thread.
The issue at hand is that the base rewriting algorithm doesn't consider the fact that GEPs can turn a scalar input into a vector of outputs. We had handling for scalar GEPs and fully vector GEPs (i.e. all vector operands), but not the scalar-base + vector-index forms. A true fix here requires treating GEP analogously to extractelement or shufflevector.
This patch is merely a workaround. It simply hides the crash at the cost of some ugly code gen for this presumable very rare pattern.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57138
llvm-svn: 352059
Add generic costs calculation for UADDSAT/USUBSAT intrinsics, this fallbacks to using generic costs for uadd_with_overflow/usub_with_overflow + a select.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56907
llvm-svn: 352044
Select zero extending and sign extending load for MIPS32.
Use size from MachineMemOperand to determine number of bytes to load.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57099
llvm-svn: 352038
Use CombinerHelper to combine extending load instructions.
G_LOAD combined with G_ZEXT, G_SEXT or G_ANYEXT gives G_ZEXTLOAD,
G_SEXTLOAD or G_LOAD with same type as def of extending instruction
respectively.
Similarly G_ZEXTLOAD combined with G_ZEXT gives G_ZEXTLOAD and
G_SEXTLOAD combined with G_SEXT gives G_SEXTLOAD with same type
as def of extending instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56914
llvm-svn: 352037
Instead of manually computing DT and PDT, we can get the from the pass
manager, which ideally has them already cached. With the new pass
manager, we could even preserve DT/PDT on a per function basis in a
module pass.
I think this also addresses the TODO about re-using the computed DTs for
BFI. IIUC, GetBFI will fetch the DT from the pass manager and when we
will fetch the cached version later.
Reviewers: vsk, hiraditya, tejohnson, thegameg, sebpop
Reviewed By: vsk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57092
llvm-svn: 352036
This reapplies commit r351987 with a failed test fix. Now the test
accepts both DW_OP_GNU_push_tls_address and DW_OP_form_tls_address
opcode.
Original commit message:
```
This is a fix for a regression introduced by the rL348194 commit. In
that change new type (MEK_DTPREL) of MipsMCExpr expression was added,
but in some places of the code this type of expression considered as
unexpected.
This change fixes the bug. The MEK_DTPREL type of expression is used for
marking TLS DIEExpr only and contains a regular sub-expression. Where we
need to handle the expression, we retrieve the sub-expression and
handle it in a common way.
```
llvm-svn: 352034
After creating new PHI instructions during isel pseudo expansion, the NoPHIs
property of MF should be reset in case it was previously set.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
llvm-svn: 352030
When we choose whether or not we should mark block as dead, we have an
inconsistent logic in markup of live blocks.
- We take candidate IF its terminator branches on constant AND it is immediately
in current loop;
- We mark successor live IF its terminator doesn't branch by constant OR it branches
by constant and the successor is its always taken block.
What we are missing here is that when the terminator branches on a constant but is
not taken as a candidate because is it not immediately in the current loop, we will
mark only one (always taken) successor as live. Therefore, we do NOT do the actual
folding but may NOT mark one of the successors as live. So the result of markup is
wrong in this case, and we may then hit various asserts.
Thanks Jordan Rupprech for reporting this!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57095
Reviewed By: rupprecht
llvm-svn: 352024
Pulling out the split-dwarf tests by way of example of how I think
llvm-symbolizer should be tested going forward. Open to
debate/discussion, though.
llvm-svn: 352004
Summary:
UBSan wants to detect when unreachable code is actually reached, so it
adds instrumentation before every `unreachable` instruction. However,
the optimizer will remove code after calls to functions marked with
`noreturn`. To avoid this UBSan removes `noreturn` from both the call
instruction as well as from the function itself. Unfortunately, ASan
relies on this annotation to unpoison the stack by inserting calls to
`_asan_handle_no_return` before `noreturn` functions. This is important
for functions that do not return but access the the stack memory, e.g.,
unwinder functions *like* `longjmp` (`longjmp` itself is actually
"double-proofed" via its interceptor). The result is that when ASan and
UBSan are combined, the `noreturn` attributes are missing and ASan
cannot unpoison the stack, so it has false positives when stack
unwinding is used.
Changes:
# UBSan now adds the `expect_noreturn` attribute whenever it removes
the `noreturn` attribute from a function
# ASan additionally checks for the presence of this attribute
Generated code:
```
call void @__asan_handle_no_return // Additionally inserted to avoid false positives
call void @longjmp
call void @__asan_handle_no_return
call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable
unreachable
```
The second call to `__asan_handle_no_return` is redundant. This will be
cleaned up in a follow-up patch.
rdar://problem/40723397
Reviewers: delcypher, eugenis
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56624
llvm-svn: 352003
Summary:
Profile sample files include the number of times each entry or inlined
call site is sampled. This is translated into the entry count metadta
on functions.
When sample data is being read, if a call site that was inlined
in the sample program is considered cold and not inlined, then
the entry count of the out-of-line functions does not reflect
the current compilation.
In this patch, we note call sites where the function was not inlined
and as a last action of the sample profile loading, we update the
called function's entry count to reflect the calls from these
call sites which are not included in the profile file.
Reviewers: danielcdh, wmi, Kader, modocache
Reviewed By: wmi
Subscribers: davidxl, eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52845
llvm-svn: 352001
This change adds two options, -i and -inlines as aliases for the -inlining option to llvm-symbolizer to improve compatibility with the GNU addr2line utility which accepts these options.
It also modifies existing tests that use -inlining to exercise these new aliases as well.
This fixes PR40073.
Reviewed by: jhenderson, Quolyk, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57083
llvm-svn: 351999
Summary:
Renamed setBaseDiscriminator to cloneWithBaseDiscriminator, to match
similar APIs. Also changed its behavior to copy over the other
discriminator components, instead of eliding them.
Renamed cloneWithDuplicationFactor to
cloneByMultiplyingDuplicationFactor, which more closely matches what
this API does.
Reviewers: dblaikie, wmi
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: zzheng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56220
llvm-svn: 351996
Summary:
Previously no client of ilist traits has needed to know about transfers
of nodes within the same list, so as an optimization, ilist doesn't call
transferNodesFromList in that case. However, now there are clients that
want to use ilist traits to cache instruction ordering information to
optimize dominance queries of instructions in the same basic block.
This change updates the existing ilist traits users to detect in-list
transfers and do nothing in that case.
After this change, we can start caching instruction ordering information
in LLVM IR data structures. There are two main ways to do that:
- by putting an order integer into the Instruction class
- by maintaining order integers in a hash table on BasicBlock
I plan to implement and measure both, but I wanted to commit this change
first to enable other out of tree ilist clients to implement this
optimization as well.
Reviewers: lattner, hfinkel, chandlerc
Subscribers: hiraditya, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57120
llvm-svn: 351992
VPlan-native path
Context: Patch Series #2 for outer loop vectorization support in LV
using VPlan. (RFC:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-December/119523.html).
Patch series #2 checks that inner loops are still trivially lock-step
among all vector elements. Non-loop branches are blindly assumed as
divergent.
Changes here implement VPlan based predication algorithm to compute
predicates for blocks that need predication. Predicates are computed
for the VPLoop region in reverse post order. A block's predicate is
computed as OR of the masks of all incoming edges. The mask for an
incoming edge is computed as AND of predecessor block's predicate and
either predecessor's Condition bit or NOT(Condition bit) depending on
whether the edge from predecessor block to the current block is true
or false edge.
Reviewers: fhahn, rengolin, hsaito, dcaballe
Reviewed By: fhahn
Patch by Satish Guggilla, thanks!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53349
llvm-svn: 351990
